On Thursday 17 January 2008 09:05:53 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
Darren Dale wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:22:45 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
But reading Darren's new bug report makes me wonder if my fix was
correct. To be honest, I'm a little confused by the bug report, not out
Darren Dale wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:22:45 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
But reading Darren's new bug report makes me wonder if my fix was
correct. To be honest, I'm a little confused by the bug report, not out
of any lack of clarity on Darren's part, but I think due to
I'm having an enormous sense of deja vu...
There was a very similar bug filed here,
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1757315group_id=80706atid=560720
which I thought I had resolved in revision 4197 (which would have made
it into all of the 0.91.x releases).
My fix there
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:22:45 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
I'm having an enormous sense of deja vu...
There was a very similar bug filed here,
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1757315group_id=8
0706atid=560720
I think it is identical, I overlooked the original
Dear All,
I am sending this email out of frustration, but I hope that someone will
be able to tell me what is going on.
I am using pylab on a Debian testing box.
I have the feeling that there is some problem with pylab when I
alternate, as I am doing now, many linear and log-log plots. Very
Hi Lorenzo,
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 4:14:24 pm Lorenzo Isella wrote:
Dear All,
I am sending this email out of frustration, but I hope that someone will
be able to tell me what is going on.
I am using pylab on a Debian testing box.
I have the feeling that there is some problem with pylab
Hello,
The situation (at least in my case) has definitely improved (for now)
after adding a clf() command at the end of every figure I generate.
Somehow, it looks like pylab cannot properly forget the previous
figure before drawing a new one unless you explicitly tell it.
Maybe it is worth a
