>
> For my current use it would be enough if savefig had an option
> bbox = 'tight'
> so that only the area actually drawn in was written
> to file.
>
> The problem is that if you set the fig size and then
> set the axis size proportionately, you must fiddle
> with things to get a tight fit
>> The best I've come up with so far is to create a figure
>> with a set size, and then add axes with a specified
>> rectangle.
On 1/12/2009 3:56 AM Jae-Joon Lee apparently wrote:
> I think the way you're doing is the easiest way.
> Anyhow, can you provide an example of a "neat path"? In my v
>
> The best I've come up with so far is to
> create a figure with a set size, and then
> add axes with a specified rectangle.
> But this does not give a neat path to
> what I want.
>
Alan,
I think the way you're doing is the easiest way.
Anyhow, can you provide an example of a "neat path"? In my
What is the simple way to do the following?
I want to set the size of the actual axes box
(i.e, , the lines drawn for the axes, not
including the ticks and labels.)
I do not care about the figure size, but I
would like the resulting drawing to have
a tight bounding box. (After I add the
ticks an
