Re: load reduction in continuation power flow (CPF)

2017-02-23 Thread Ray Zimmerman
t; Date: Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 8:28 AM > To: MATPOWER discussion forum <matpowe...@list.cornell.edu > <mailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu>> > Subject: Re: load reduction in continuation power flow (CPF) > > The code looks correct to me. I’m not sure why the

Re: load reduction in continuation power flow (CPF)

2017-02-16 Thread Majid Mehdizadeh
m <matpowe...@list.cornell.edu> > Subject: Re: load reduction in continuation power flow (CPF) > > The code looks correct to me. I’m not sure why the load margin decreases, > but the changes in load (from positive to equally negative) may be forcing > the OPF solution into generator dis

Re: load reduction in continuation power flow (CPF)

2017-02-16 Thread Abhyankar, Shrirang G.
to:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu>> Subject: Re: load reduction in continuation power flow (CPF) The code looks correct to me. I’m not sure why the load margin decreases, but the changes in load (from positive to equally negative) may be forcing the OPF solution into generator dispatch solutions

Re: load reduction in continuation power flow (CPF)

2017-02-16 Thread Ray Zimmerman
The code looks correct to me. I’m not sure why the load margin decreases, but the changes in load (from positive to equally negative) may be forcing the OPF solution into generator dispatch solutions that somehow reduce the load margin. Ray > On Feb 15, 2017, at 10:45 PM, Majid Mehdizadeh