Re: subshell output swallowed (patch)

2006-01-24 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote: An strace -e trace=read,write of a similar case showed this: [...] read(4, \33[0mcopy.py\33[0m\33[0mi..., 100) = 100 write(1, \33[0mcopy.py\33[0m\33[0mi..., 100) = 100 read(4, m \33[0m_strptime.py\33[0m ..., 100) =

Re: subshell output swallowed (patch)

2006-01-24 Thread Egmont Koblinger
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:29:23PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: write(1, \33[0mcopy_reg.py\33[0m\33[0mi..., 100) = 53 This strace is not convincing - i don't see calls failing with -1. No, no syscall is failing. You ask the kernel to write 100 bytes, and since a signal interrupts it,

Re: subshell output swallowed (patch)

2006-01-24 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:29:23PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: write(1, \33[0mcopy_reg.py\33[0m\33[0mi..., 100) = 53 This strace is not convincing - i don't see calls failing with -1. No, no syscall is failing. You ask the kernel to

Re: [patch] allow seeking in linear files

2006-01-24 Thread Jindrich Makovicka
On 1/23/06, Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Jindrich, I see you have submitted this patch several time by now - the first one appears to be from May 2003. Hopefully it will get into CVS this time... So now to the patch - first I'd like to comment the last hunk of your patch: -

Re: [patch] allow seeking in linear files

2006-01-24 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello Jindrich, On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Jindrich Makovicka wrote: On 1/23/06, Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So now to the patch - first I'd like to comment the last hunk of your patch: - n_read_total, ctx-progress_bytes); + n_read_total +

Re: subshell output swallowed (patch)

2006-01-24 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: write(1, \33[0mcopy_reg.py\33[0m\33[0mi..., 100) = 53 This strace is not convincing - i don't see calls failing with -1. No, no syscall is failing. You ask the

Re: subshell output swallowed (patch)

2006-01-24 Thread Pavel Tsekov
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Egmont Koblinger Betreff: Re: subshell output swallowed (patch) Datum: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:16:34 +0100 Hi, Your first post implied that it was SIGCHLD interrupting a write() call which is reponsible for the broken ouput of `ls'. I'm not 100%

Re: subshell output swallowed (patch)

2006-01-24 Thread Egmont Koblinger
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:41PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: I can point you to at least one similiar case in which the supposed fix did fix the symptom but not the cause. The patch in question fixed the subshell behaviour only when bash was used. With tcsh the same fix caused MC to hang. I

[bug #15524] 2GB file size limit in fish

2006-01-24 Thread Ludovic Drolez
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=15524 Summary: 2GB file size limit in fish Project: GNU Midnight Commander Submitted by: ldrolez Submitted on: Tue 01/24/06 at 18:03 Category: VFS

bugs, patches, stuff

2006-01-24 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
hello, this is my personal wishlist of *really simple* things to do: - finally commit my patch at https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=9631 - deal with https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitemitem_id=13733 - confirm

Re: bugs, patches, stuff

2006-01-24 Thread Pavel Tsekov
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Oswald Buddenhagen An: mc-devel@gnome.org Betreff: bugs, patches, stuff Datum: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:02:58 +0100 hello, this is my personal wishlist of *really simple* things to do: - finally commit my patch at