[MCN-L] IP SIG: MPAA admits its statistics are full of...ummmm...errors

2008-01-27 Thread Amalyah Keshet
For those of you on college campuses following this sad saga:



- Original Message  
Subject: Re: MPAA admits its statistics are fullof...u...errors


 This is the famous study that MPAA has been waving around but has
 refused to show anyone the basic data and methodology. Indeed, in the
 fall of 2006, Dan Glickman promised to deliver a full copy of the study
 to then Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter. As of yesterday, the staff was
 still waiting for the study.
 
 So we're now told by the MPAA: opps there are some flaws, and our 44%
 loss due to college students is only 15%. They still refuse to recognize
 the fact, as noted in the AP story below, that 80% of student live
 off-campus and use commercial internet services, bringing the number
 down to 3%. They other fascinating number in the MPAA/LEK College
 Summary slides is that claim - without giving any reasoning - that
 college students substitute 2.4 times that of average downloaders.
 Last time I checked college students had far less disposable income than
 average working stiffs. At the every least, I can't see them
 substituting 2.4 times. But even if that number were cut in half, that
 would mean the college problem amounts to 1.5% of their losses.
 
 There are several ironies at work here. First, college network
 administrators treat P2P illegal activity very seriously. Many already
 have policies and educational activities in place. Second, the MPAA has
 managed to convince the House Education Committee to put in an unfunded
 mandate in the College Accessibility and Affordability Act.
 
 Jim
 
 
 Here's the AP story:
 
 MPAA Admits Mistake on Downloading Study
 
 By JUSTIN POPE - 15 hours ago
 
 Hollywood laid much of the blame for illegal movie downloading on
 college students. Now, it says its math was wrong.
 
 In a 2005 study it commissioned, the Motion Picture Association of
 America claimed that 44 percent of the industry's domestic losses came
 from illegal downloading of movies by college students, who often have
 access to high-bandwidth networks on campus.
 
 The MPAA has used the study to pressure colleges to take tougher steps
 to prevent illegal file-sharing and to back legislation currently before
 the House of Representatives that would force them to do so.
 
 But now the MPAA, which represents the U.S. motion picture industry, has
 told education groups a human error in that survey caused it to get
 the number wrong. It now blames college students for about 15 percent of
 revenue loss.
 
 The MPAA says that's still significant, and justifies a major effort by
 colleges and universities to crack down on illegal file-sharing. But
 Mark Luker, vice president of campus IT group Educause, says it doesn't
 account for the fact that more than 80 percent of college students live
 off campus and aren't necessarily using college networks. He says 3
 percent is a more reasonable estimate for the percentage of revenue that
 might be at stake on campus networks.
 
 The 44 percent figure was used to show that if college campuses could
 somehow solve this problem on this campus, then it would make a
 tremendous difference in the business of the motion picture industry,
 Luker said. The new figures prove any solution on campus will have only
 a small impact on the industry itself.
 
 The original report, by research firm LEK, claims the U.S. motion
 picture industry lost $6.1 billion to piracy worldwide, with most of the
 losses overseas. It identified the typical movie pirate as a male aged
 16-24. MPAA said in a statement that no errors had been found in the
 study besides the percentage of revenue losses that could be attributed
 to college students, but that it would hire a third party to validate
 the numbers.
 
 We take this error very seriously and have taken strong and immediate
 action to both investigate the root cause of this problem as well as
 substantiate the accuracy of the latest report, the group said in a
 statement.
 
 Terry Hartle, vice president of the American Council on Education, which
 represents higher education in Washington, said the mistakes showed the
 entertainment industry has unfairly targeted college campuses.
 
 Illegal peer-to-peer file-sharing is a society-wide problem. Some of it
 occurs at college s and universities but it is a small portion of the
 total, he said, adding colleges will continue to take the problem
 seriously, but more regulation isn't necessary. 
 
 -Original Message-
On Behalf Of Steve Worona
 Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:12 AM
 To: lawfuluse at lists.publicknowledge.org
 Subject: MPAA admits its statistics are full of...u...errors
 
 For those who haven't seen it yet:
 
 http://www.pr-inside.com/group-revises-figures-on-how-much-r398676.htm
 
 and
 
 http://insidehighered.com/news/2008/01/23/mpaa
 
 So the 44% was really 15%, and it was all due to human error. So this
 means -- what? -- it wasn't the dog? But let's not be too harsh;
 remember, 

[MCN-L] Spam, Spam Glorious Spam

2008-01-27 Thread Jerry Powell
 We're using SpammerTrap from SECNAT and are very pleased with it. Runs
on a dedicated PC in our datacenter but before our firewall and they
actively update and tweak the settings remotely and run interference for
us vis-a-vis the Internet. But we have as much control as we want
internally, so we can globally or even down to an individual basis
maintain white and black lists (we have a few people in marketing who
actually WANT to receive all their spam, though we only allow them to
receive the spam that makes it through the initial screen as harmless).
So, for us, it's a nice combination of hardware-based and actively
maintained pre-firewall screening and interface/representative to the
Internet writ large and a lot of internal flexibility in allowing
customized solutions for our staff. Everyone, for example, gets 2 emails
a day with questionable email headers--emails that got picked out at
the very last stage of screening--which one can scan through and delete,
if they're all truly spam (and almost invariably they are), or one can
release individual items, which allows them to pass through; and one
can also individually black or white list and i.d. as spam or not spam
each item, if they want to go to that trouble, so that the spam filter
becomes smarter over time. Nice because individuals can then help
refine the filters for the institution as a whole, ultimately.

Don't recall the cost, but not unreasonable at all--less than we were
paying for Symantec's product--with an upfront cost (maybe $3k??) and a
modest subscription fee, I think.

Jerry

Jerry Powell
Director of Information Systems
Winterthur Museum  Country Estate
Winterthur, DE 19735
(302) 888-4751