Re: [mcollective-users] Some discrepancy in direct addressing mode with reply-to

2018-01-28 Thread kk21987
tantly but it doesnt expect replies or wait for replies > > https://gist.github.com/ripienaar/52e73db531cc22b434b8433ababd8df2 > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, at 16:51, kk21987 wrote: > > It would be good if I get true batch mode where all requests have the > same > > ID, since my

Re: [mcollective-users] Some discrepancy in direct addressing mode with reply-to

2018-01-28 Thread kk21987
, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, at 15:29, kk21987 wrote: > > Yes please. If the reply-to works well with batch mode it would be great > > for me as it will solve my proble :) > > yeah fire and forget doesnt support batch mode in the normal client > >

Re: [mcollective-users] Some discrepancy in direct addressing mode with reply-to

2018-01-28 Thread kk21987
Jan 2018, at 11:13, kk21987 <kkarth...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > Understood and thanks for the detailed clarification! I have already > splitted as different sub collectives (2000 per subcollective) but again > all the subcollectives are connected with Broker-A which will act

Re: [mcollective-users] Some discrepancy in direct addressing mode with reply-to

2018-01-28 Thread kk21987
it will go smooth, since I see mcollective publish the message very quickly to Broker-A(central) and as you said this is getting big pressure. On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 3:35:01 PM UTC+5:30, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > > > > On 28 Jan 2018, at 10:48, kk21987 <kkarth...@gmail.com &g

Re: [mcollective-users] Some discrepancy in direct addressing mode with reply-to

2018-01-28 Thread kk21987
and would curious to understand why it gives such difference. I believe direct addressing should be fast compare with broadcast, correct me if am wrong. On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 3:11:34 PM UTC+5:30, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > > > On 28 Jan 2018, at 10:35, kk21987 <kkarth.

Re: [mcollective-users] Some discrepancy in direct addressing mode with reply-to

2018-01-28 Thread kk21987
it will be good. Any suggestion or best tuning parameters available for this. I will try to look for ActiveMQ documentation to get the something. On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 2:03:34 PM UTC+5:30, kk21987 wrote: > Thanks. > > Yes I captured the client debug log as well and

Re: [mcollective-users] Some discrepancy in direct addressing mode with reply-to

2018-01-27 Thread kk21987
s executed or not. Name ↑Number Of Pending Messages Number Of Consumers Messages Enqueued Messages Dequeued Views Operations mcollective.nodes 9 84 884 875 Browse Active Consumers Active Producers Send To PurgeDelete On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 7:48:15 AM UTC+5:30, kk21987 wrote: >

[mcollective-users] Some discrepancy in direct addressing mode with reply-to

2018-01-27 Thread kk21987
Hi, Am having some issue with --reply-to behavior and not sure if its an issue or the behavior itself like that. My setup is drawn in