Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Antti Kaijanmäki
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:43 -0700, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: Hoping some of you have time to take a look and supply comments... http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance, as usual. current version is the .7 revision. Section 3: Application Compatibility I assume this section talks about 3rd

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
Antti Kaijanmäki wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:43 -0700, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: Hoping some of you have time to take a look and supply comments... http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance, as usual. current version is the .7 revision. Section 3: Application Compatibility I assume

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Antti Kaijanmäki
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 12:39 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: this would be a great idea for the 1.2 compliance spec to add imo. (but this doc is still the old 1.1 compliance) OK, so you don't want to add anything new to this 1.1, right? When will we begin to draft 1.2? It seems there's quite a

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 12:39 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: this would be a great idea for the 1.2 compliance spec to add imo. (but this doc is still the old 1.1 compliance) OK, so you don't want to add anything new to this 1.1, right? When will we begin

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Miretti, Gabriel
-Original Message- From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On Behalf Of Wichmann, Mats D Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:44 PM To: meego-dev@meego.com Subject: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review ... Hoping some of you have

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote: Hi, I just begin to work with Meego and particularly with Meego Compliance. In 3.2.2, the specification says: They shall import external interfaces only from the following sources: * shared libraries supplied as a part of the application package My

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 08:28 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Miretti, Gabriel wrote: Hi, I just begin to work with Meego and particularly with Meego Compliance. In 3.2.2, the specification says: My question: There is a preferred/recommended/mandatory

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 2/7/2011 4:41 AM, Antti Kaijanmäki wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:43 -0700, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: Hoping some of you have time to take a look and supply comments... http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance, as usual. current version is the .7 revision. Section 3: Application

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Meego, how to read system language without MeegoTouch?

2011-02-07 Thread mikhail.zabaluev
Hi, -Original Message- From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On Behalf Of ext jeremias bosch Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 4:16 PM To: meego-dev@meego.com Subject: [MeeGo-dev] Meego, how to read system language without MeegoTouch? Hello, I need

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Sergio Schvezov wrote: Suppose that your app needs 3rd party libs and you install them in the folder /opt/foo/lib. Before you start your app, you can manipulate the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to pull in your lib folder. [snip] So imagine the case of openssl, you provide it as it

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 2/7/2011 9:03 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Sergio Schvezov wrote: Suppose that your app needs 3rd party libs and you install them in the folder /opt/foo/lib. Before you start your app, you can manipulate the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to pull in your lib folder. [snip]

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Arjan van de Ven wrote: I.e. We refuse to supply openssl as part of MeeGo core, but you can't use openssl as your own private library because QtNetwork is covertly loading it with dlopen(). That's nuts. I'm pretty sure openssl is part of the actual compliance package

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Antti Kaijanmäki
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:43 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Arjan van de Ven wrote: I.e. We refuse to supply openssl as part of MeeGo core, but you can't use openssl as your own private library because QtNetwork is covertly loading it with dlopen(). That's

Re: [MeeGo-dev] updated MeeGo compliance spec available for review

2011-02-07 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 2/7/2011 10:0st core') If you compile your app against libssl in Meego 1.1 it will link against libssl.so.8, when you go to Meego 1.1.90-1.2 your app won't load as libssl.so.10 is there. If you symlink it may work, but you can never know as that's why the version changed in the first

Re: [MeeGo-dev] How do you make libqtwebkit-devel-2.1.0 for armv7l?

2011-02-07 Thread fathi.boudra
Hi, On what host system do you make: libqtwebkit-devel-2.1.0~2011week03-1.5.armv7l.rpm? (Ubuntu ?, Which version?) On MeeGo OBS What cross-compiler do you use? (Which version?) GCC 4.5.1 What build options are you using? CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2