Some of us already have companies which can do that :) doing it on a global mer
scale may lead to politics again...On 06/10/2011 17:03 Jeremiah Foster wrote:
If you guys are serious about this, create a company. Then you can
sign NDA's which you'll need when you approach the commercial hardware
de
If you guys are serious about this, create a company. Then you can
sign NDA's which you'll need when you approach the commercial hardware
developers.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Jespersen wrote:
> Den 06-10-2011 07:11, Carsten Munk skrev:
>>
>> Den her kan jeg vidst godt svare på dansk
Den 06-10-2011 07:11, Carsten Munk skrev:
Den her kan jeg vidst godt svare på dansk :)
:-)
Jeg tror at for at få bedst success, så er det bedst at have noget
ordentligt at vise før vi virkelig rækker ud til firmaer. Vi skal også
have vendor-historien på plads, inkl. dokumentation hvordan ma
o/
2011/10/6 Ville M. Vainio
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Graham Cobb wrote:
>
> > My personal view (which is partly based on my marketing job) is that you
> have
> > to start off focused on a very visible end user experience in order to
> get the
> > project the necessary publicity. For
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Graham Cobb wrote:
> My personal view (which is partly based on my marketing job) is that you have
> to start off focused on a very visible end user experience in order to get the
> project the necessary publicity. For your own governance reasons you will
Yeah,
On Thursday 06 October 2011 07:33:24 Carsten Munk wrote:
> We have chosen to move out the hardware adaptations and UX'es out of
> the core, into the community surrounding it, to get rid of a lot of
> politics - to concentrate on what's technically good and benefits us
> all - not having to maintain
