Re: [Meep-discuss] Meep-mpi: hard limit of ~ 2e9 points?

2011-01-03 Thread Georg Wachter
Hello, While it is good to see that many users are interested in adaptive resolutions for meep, what I meant was actually Is there any interest *by the developers* to implement such a feature somewhen?. Mischa wrote: you could consider doing a coordinate transformation that magnifies the

Re: [Meep-discuss] Meep-mpi: hard limit of ~ 2e9 points?

2010-12-31 Thread gpipc
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:36:54 +0100, Georg Wachter georgwach...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, For the simulation of small metal structures with meep, I unfortunately need a ridiculously high resolution, Hi Georg, since we are working with a similar FDTD problem (simulation of small metal

Re: [Meep-discuss] Meep-mpi: hard limit of ~ 2e9 points?

2010-12-29 Thread gpipc
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:36:54 +0100, Georg Wachter georgwach...@gmail.com wrote: PS.: I would really like to see a possibility for having regions of different resolution in meep. This is The One Feature (for me) that commercial competitors have over Meep or any free electromagnetism

[Meep-discuss] Meep-mpi: hard limit of ~ 2e9 points?

2010-12-28 Thread Georg Wachter
Hello, For the simulation of small metal structures with meep, I unfortunately need a ridiculously high resolution, leading to a lot of points in my simulation box (around 2.2e9). On trying to run a 512-core job, I ran into a strange error: meep_highres.e489139:meep: Cannot split -2080123546