Re: [Meep-discuss] Problem with Inverted Pyramid Structure at Small Absorption

2020-08-15 Thread Ardavan Oskooi
Note that due to the Fourier Uncertainty Principle, the runtime should be at least ~1/frequency resolution. In practice, the runtime may even have to be twice as large as demonstrated in

Re: [Meep-discuss] Problem with Inverted Pyramid Structure at Small Absorption

2020-08-15 Thread J. Philip Haupt
I've tried increasing PML thickness (went up to 8 micron) and resolution (went up to 150). As for run time, I am using the decay factor, and have manually been terminating it when the reflectances exceed unity. I think the maximum time I've run for is around 3000 units. On 2020-08-14 9:11

Re: [Meep-discuss] Problem with Inverted Pyramid Structure at Small Absorption

2020-08-14 Thread Ardavan Oskooi
For additional details regarding PMLs in Meep, see: https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Perfectly_Matched_Layer/. As described in https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/FAQ/#checking-convergence, you need to check the convergence by increasing the resolution, PML thickness, and run time

Re: [Meep-discuss] Problem with Inverted Pyramid Structure at Small Absorption

2020-07-31 Thread J. Philip Haupt
Thanks, but it seems like this doesn't change much. I turned off subpixel averaging, increased the resolution to 100, and also increased the PML thickness to 1.2 (=max wavelength). I have run so far for 1800 time units. At 25 time units, the field decay was 0.0090 whereas at 1725 time units

Re: [Meep-discuss] Problem with Inverted Pyramid Structure at Small Absorption

2020-07-30 Thread Ardavan Oskooi
Try turning off subpixel averaging since it sometimes causes instabilities with the prism sidewall angle feature. This means that you will also need to increase the resolution. On 7/29/20 16:38, J. Philip Haupt wrote: I get that the fields diverge (albeit very slowly), at least so it seems.