Re: Issue 98 in memcached: RPM can't figure out how to increment versions.

2009-11-02 Thread memcached
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 98 by dorma...@rydia.net: RPM can't figure out how to increment versions. http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=98 Meant to close this issue, sorry for the spam :( -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Re: Memcached 1.4.3-rc1

2009-11-02 Thread kroki
On 2 ноя, 14:14, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote: Next: *please* test it out if you can. We're scheduling 1.4.3 final to come out in six days. Large multigets are broken in 1.4.3_rc1. The fix is below: From d8b4153bb65e8cbb685363b42ed7ff11ff49d4e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomash

Re: Memcached 1.4.3-rc1

2009-11-02 Thread kroki
On 2 ноя, 15:58, kroki tomash.brec...@gmail.com wrote: Large multigets are broken in 1.4.3_rc1.  The fix is below: Also, if c-rcurr desn't end in '\0' (I don't know if this is the case), then we have to be sure that ptr[5] is not outside the buffer (malicious user could send lots of spaces).

Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread Jay Paroline
I'm running this by you guys to make sure we're not trying something completely insane. ;) We already rely on memcached quite heavily to minimize load on our DB with stunning success, but as a music streaming service, we also serve up lots and lots of 5-6MB files, and right now we don't have a

Memcached 1.4.3-rc2

2009-11-02 Thread dormando
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes143rc2 Bug reported by Tomash, fixed by trond, reviewed by dustin, and now we have a new tarball. Thanks, and please continue testing :) -Dormando

Re: Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread Jay Paroline
I'm not sure how well a reverse proxy would fit our needs, having never used one before. The way we do streaming is a client sends a one- time-use key to the stream server. The key is used to determine which file should be streamed, and then the file is returned. The effect is that no two

Re: Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread dormando
You could put something like varnish inbetween that final step and your client.. so key is pulled in, file is looked up, then file is fetched *through* varnish. Of course I don't know offhand how much work it would be to make your app deal with that fetch-through scenario. Since these files are

Re: Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread Les Mikesell
dormando wrote: You could put something like varnish inbetween that final step and your client.. so key is pulled in, file is looked up, then file is fetched *through* varnish. Of course I don't know offhand how much work it would be to make your app deal with that fetch-through scenario.

Re: Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread dormando
You could also redirect the client to the proxy/cache after computing the filename, but that exposes the name in a way that might be reusable. perlbal is great for this... I think nginx might be able to do it too? Internal reproxy. Server returns headers for where the load balancer is to

Re: Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread Mark Atwood
On Nov 2, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Jay Paroline wrote: What I'd love to do is get those popular files served from memory, which should alleviate load on the disks considerably. Obviously the file system cache does some of this already, but since it's not distributed it uses the space a lot less

Re: Using memcached as a distributed file cache

2009-11-02 Thread Vladimir Vuksan
Perhaps using tmpfs may be an option. Benefit of using tmpfs is that you can create a filesystem that is larger than physical memory. This has the benefit that virtual memory manager will swap out unused items to disk. You can then perhaps NFS export the file system or do something else.