maybe could be used something like flatbuffers?
Em qui, 9 de mai de 2019 às 20:15, dormando escreveu:
> To that end, I think SASL's confused everyone who's ever met it, and I
> don't think anyone actually asked for it back in binprot days.
>
> Said I was going to do this before but hadn't...
flatbuffers are unrelated to protocol, and are definitely not backwards
compatible with ascii :p
On Thu, 9 May 2019, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> maybe could be used something like flatbuffers?
>
> Em qui, 9 de mai de 2019 às 20:15, dormando escreveu:
> To that end, I think SASL's confused
To that end, I think SASL's confused everyone who's ever met it, and I
don't think anyone actually asked for it back in binprot days.
Said I was going to do this before but hadn't... Lets try something
simple, and if someone asks for SASL I think it's actually easy:
client connect:
set auth 0 0
Indeed we would. SASL is actually a text based protocol, as it's used in
SMTP and similar. That shouldn't be too bad.
On Thu, 9 May 2019, Om Kale wrote:
> Hey Dormando,As of now only binary protocol supports SASL.
> Correct me if I am wrong but to ensure compatibility with SASL and
>
Hey Dormando,
As of now only binary protocol supports SASL.
Correct me if I am wrong but to ensure compatibility with SASL and
libmemcached clients we would need binary protocol support right?
Thanks and Regards,
Om Kale
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:58 PM dormando wrote:
> Yo,
>
> Any of you
Yo,
Any of you out there really _like_ the binary protocol? Aside from the
features it gives (CAS everywhere, pipelining, etc).
just thinkin' through some things.
Thanks,
-Dormando
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"memcached" group.
To
