Re: [MBZ] [OT] Radial Engines (was: Number of cylinders)

2007-01-20 Thread OK Don
Yes - and they were timed 2 (IIRC) degrees apart. Even at only 2200RPM, it took a long time to burn that volume of fuel/air - helped to start the flame on both sides of the chamber. Aaah redundant plugs and magnetoes I guess? -j. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Radial Engines (was: Number of cylinders)

2007-01-20 Thread John W. Reames III
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, OK Don wrote: > Ours didn't leak very much - there was a fair amount of smoke on > starting, but it didn't last very long. I never tried to figure out > how they kept all the oil from ending up in the bottom cylinders. The > spark plug holes (two per cylinder) were horizontal

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Radial Engines (was: Number of cylinders)

2007-01-20 Thread OK Don
Ours didn't leak very much - there was a fair amount of smoke on starting, but it didn't last very long. I never tried to figure out how they kept all the oil from ending up in the bottom cylinders. The spark plug holes (two per cylinder) were horizontal (hemi combustion chambers) and 180 degrees

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Radial Engines (was: Number of cylinders)

2007-01-19 Thread jwreames
Sounds like it would 1) leak a lot, and 2) smoke even more Nifty feature, that self-hydrolocking. I guess the spark plug threads on the bottom cylinders wear out sooner than those on the upper ones :P Fun Fun! -j. -- John Reames 1985 300d (223K "Gerta") 1991 Cherokee (149K "the fishbowl") 1999

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Radial Engines (was: Number of cylinders)

2007-01-19 Thread OK Don
The sump is a separate tank - I think they call these 'dry sump' engines. Oil doe s collect in the bottom cylinders while it's sitting - you have slowly crank the engine through a couple of turns before trying to start it (aircraft application). They have been known to blow a cylinder or two off w