So that means Trump has no chance of winning Iowa right? If he does, does
that mean there was no fraud? Or if Clinton wins, does that prove your
point? If there were no fraud, would Trump sweep all 50 states?
On Oct 18, 2016 11:45 PM, "Curley McLain via Mercedes" <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
OK, lets try this again. I didn't mean to hijack the 2.3 l thread.
I have not yet had time to watch this video, but i'd guess this scott
foval is the guy who organized the massive voter fraud in Iowa in 2008,
and now has been promoted to the chief of fraud for the H (road to hell
) campaign.
