redghost wrote:
What of all the shuttered refineries. They are just dormant superfund
sites. I am sure that somebody will get the bright idea to fire them
back up.
Towards the end of when I lived in Alma, MI, Lamar-Diamond-Shamrock
bought out the former Total oil refinery and dismantled
Paint Job Info
- Original Message -
From: Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] diesel fuel info from chevron
David Brodbeck wrote:
Christopher McCann wrote:
ULSD has almost NO sulfur
/Index.htm For my Paint Job Info
- Original Message -
From: Loren Faeth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] diesel fuel info from chevron
Two more 50-100 million gallon per year refineries were announced
What of all the shuttered refineries. They are just dormant superfund
sites. I am sure that somebody will get the bright idea to fire them
back up.
Oh, wait, that would mean cutting into the profits, and might flood the
market with fuel, thereby lowering profits per barrel
On Thursday,
But these plants are using synfuel coal. That allows for multiple tax
breaks, such that the gummint covers 90% of the cost to produce
On Thursday, April 6, 2006, at 07:34 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't I read on this list someone say Ethenol is a negative return?
-
From: Loren Faeth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] diesel fuel info from chevron
Two more 50-100 million gallon per year refineries were announced today,
in
the same small town. There are refineries
I was looking for something on octane and tripped over
http://www.chevron.com/products/prodserv/fuels/bulletin/diesel/
and of course the timeline for low sulfer diesel
http://www.chevron.com/products/prodserv/fuels/diesel/ulsd.shtml
John
1983 300TDt 362k Kilometers (mobil 1 Delvac)
1990
excellent links! thanks!
Vehicles not specifically designed for use with S15 (ULSD) may use either
S15 (ULSD) or S500 (500 ppm) diesel.
So does this mean that we will actually be able to find S500 pumps around?
That would be great.
If not, will a constant use of a lubricity
Christopher McCann wrote:
excellent links! thanks!
Vehicles not specifically designed for use with S15 (ULSD) may use either S15 (ULSD) or S500 (500 ppm) diesel.
So does this mean that we will actually be able to find S500 pumps around? That would be great.
If not, will a constant
So there is NO moving part in an IP that is lubricated with JUST fuel? engine
oil lubricates everything? Cant't see how that could be...I'm probably wrong,
but would like a little more info/confirmation.
Is there ANYTHING we need to concern ourselves about regarding ULSD?
Thanks!
On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Christopher McCann wrote:
So there is NO moving part in an IP that is lubricated with JUST
fuel? engine oil lubricates everything? Cant't see how that could
be...I'm probably wrong, but would like a little more info/
confirmation.
The parts of the pump
Christopher McCann wrote:
So there is NO moving part in an IP that is lubricated with JUST fuel? engine
oil lubricates everything? Cant't see how that could be...I'm probably wrong,
but would like a little more info/confirmation.
Is there ANYTHING we need to concern ourselves about
John Berryman wrote:
On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Christopher McCann wrote:
So there is NO moving part in an IP that is lubricated with JUST
fuel? engine oil lubricates everything? Cant't see how that could
be...I'm probably wrong, but would like a little more info/
confirmation.
The
Will dig up a diagram.
FYI, the sulphur is not what lubricates. The process which removes the
sulphur destroys the lubriciity. I've heard this before (from Stanadyne) and
the Chevron website makes the same point. ADDING sulphur to ULSD will NOT help
lubricty, so if some yahoo comes
ULSD has almost NO sulfur but better lubricity than than ANY
#1 diesel and than MOST #2.
Becuase a lubricity agent is added, I assume...
Chris
Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Berryman wrote:
On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Christopher McCann wrote:
So there is NO moving
On Apr 6, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Christopher McCann wrote:
Correction: Sulfur lubricates NOTHING! When refining to remove sulfur
from the fuel, often other fractions that are lubricants are also
removed. Unless they are replaced (they often weren't when low sulfur
diesel was first produced) the
Christopher McCann wrote:
ULSD has almost NO sulfur but better lubricity than than ANY
#1 diesel and than MOST #2.
Becuase a lubricity agent is added, I assume...
Yup. This turned out to be more difficult than expected. The original
idea was that it would be added at the refinery.
David Brodbeck wrote:
Christopher McCann wrote:
ULSD has almost NO sulfur but better lubricity than than ANY
#1 diesel and than MOST #2.
Becuase a lubricity agent is added, I assume...
I don't believe any lubricity additive is necessary (even for use with
fuel lubricated distributor
/my_911/Index.htm For my Paint Job Info
- Original Message -
From: Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] diesel fuel info from chevron
David Brodbeck wrote:
Christopher McCann wrote
19 matches
Mail list logo
