Re: [MBZ] 91 350SDL Advice

2005-12-22 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Yea, top end will not help the bottom end shortcomings. eric peterson wrote: Isn't the 350DSL the one that is noted as a rod bender?? If the head has been reworked or a new head put on will this solve the problems associated with this engine?? I have found one that has 167K and has had the

Re: [MBZ] 91 350SDL Advice

2005-12-22 Thread Lee Levitt
Kaleb writes: Yea, top end will not help the bottom end shortcomings. Are we talking about girls or cars? :) Lee eric peterson wrote: Isn't the 350DSL the one that is noted as a rod bender?? If the head has been reworked or a new head put on will this solve the problems

Re: [MBZ] 91 350SDL Advice

2005-12-22 Thread Zeitgeist
To be honest, it could naturally apply to guys as well. On 12/21/05, Lee Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kaleb writes: Yea, top end will not help the bottom end shortcomings. Are we talking about girls or cars? Casey Olympia, WA Biodiesel: I drive in a persistent vegetative state '87

Re: [MBZ] 91 350SDL Advice

2005-12-21 Thread Kevin
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:14:48PM -0800, eric peterson wrote: Isn't the 350DSL the one that is noted as a rod bender?? If the head has been reworked or a new head put on will this solve the problems associated with this engine?? I have found one that has 167K and has had the top end

Re: [MBZ] 91 350SDL Advice

2005-12-21 Thread Jim Cathey
Isn't the 350DSL the one that is noted as a rod bender?? If the head has been reworked or a new head Yes. put on will this solve the problems associated with this engine?? I have found one that has 167K and has No. had the top end rebuilt don't have specifics yet as to what was done.