Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-28 Thread Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes
> The rebuilt native 87 300td half shaft failed within 500 miles as > predicted and the diff tried to leave the subframe, which was twisted up in > the process. > > I have procured a v8 subframe, 2.65 210mm diff from a 91 500sl, v8 > driveshaft complete, and a 4 bolt flange for the transmission

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-28 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Sounds like FAG is one to add to the 'good' list... Thanks for the info - LarryT On 07/27/2018 11:14 PM, Craig via Mercedes wrote: On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:33:51 -0700 Jim Cathey via Mercedes wrote: Have never heard of FAG, or most others. It's short for Fischer's Automatische

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:33:51 -0700 Jim Cathey via Mercedes wrote: > > > > Have never heard of FAG, or most others. > > > It's short for Fischer's Automatische Gussstahlkugelfabrik, > obviously. :-) Trademarked since 1905. > > Fischer was first to invent a machine for making high-quality

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes
> > Have never heard of FAG, or most others. It's short for Fischer's Automatische Gussstahlkugelfabrik, obviously. :-) Trademarked since 1905. Fischer was first to invent a machine for making high-quality steel spheres in volume, in 1883. -- Jim ___

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Thanks Mitch!   I'll probably go with the Timken, National or SKF.  No need to cheap out.  Course I don't want to go with OEM MB which is probably triple the cost of Timken or SKF. TIA - Larry On 07/27/2018 3:41 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes wrote: I just took a look at Rock Auto.

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
SKF or Timken. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes
It's kind of like Red Bull. If it wasn't expensive, you wouldn't know you were drinking a premium beverage :-) On Fri, Jul 27, 2018, 12:41 PM Mitch Haley via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > I just took a look at Rock Auto. > HooFlungDung are under $25, one of them is $13. > Timken and

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
I just took a look at Rock Auto. HooFlungDung are under $25, one of them is $13. Timken and National are $54. SKF are $85. Mitch. > On July 27, 2018 at 3:30 PM Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes > wrote: > > > Seems like any bearing on that list would be indistinguishable from the > others in

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes
Seems like any bearing on that list would be indistinguishable from the others in terms of real world performance. Is that list based upon anything objective? A Timken bearing is a pretty good bearing in my experience. On Fri, Jul 27, 2018, 10:24 AM Rick Knoble via Mercedes <

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Rick Knoble via Mercedes
Larry asks: >When I get to the point when I'm ready to buy a >replacement bearing kit,  >which  brand is the >highest quality?  In my opinion, (and others) here is the pecking order of bearing quality.  1. FAG 2. SKF 3. NSK 4. NTN 5. Timken Aisin should probably be in there somewhere.  Stay

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Hi Ya'll, When I get to the point when I'm ready to buy a replacement bearing kit, which  brand is the highest quality? I've seen FAG, Aftermarket (there's a creative name), and others.  Have never heard of FAG, or most others. TIA! LarryT On 07/26/2018 8:48 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-27 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Thanks Peter On 07/26/2018 8:48 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes wrote: On July 26, 2018 at 8:33 PM Peter Frederick via Mercedes wrote: The tie rod has a standard tie rod end that you will need to pop loose with a pickle fork or a lever type tool (which I prefer). The other links unbolt,

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-26 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
> On July 26, 2018 at 8:33 PM Peter Frederick via Mercedes > wrote: > > > The tie rod has a standard tie rod end that you will need to pop loose with a > pickle fork or a lever type tool (which I prefer). > > The other links unbolt, but the rubber is part of the spring action and the >

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-26 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
The tie rod has a standard tie rod end that you will need to pop loose with a pickle fork or a lever type tool (which I prefer). The other links unbolt, but the rubber is part of the spring action and the wheel carrier must be at ride height when you tighten the bolts back up. No need to

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-26 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes
no, this is the 5 link rear suspension. No ball joints, except one link has small ball joints. the 5 suspension links are what need to be tightened with the wheel in driving position (loaded) all other fasteners are tightened as normal. I reuse all fasteners that are not obviously bad.

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-26 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Thanks Mitch - I'll have my suspension shop check the alignment and also check the torque on the fasteners... Sincerely, Larry On 07/25/2018 10:56 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes wrote: Removing the wheel carrier should involve some ball joints, a brake caliper and a parking brake cable.

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-25 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
Removing the wheel carrier should involve some ball joints, a brake caliper and a parking brake cable. Suspension position shouldn't matter when tightening ball joint stud nuts. If you loosen any bolts in control arm bushings, those should be tightened with the car parked on a level surface,

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-25 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Hey Curley, That's really good to know!  Thanks for that! Now my plans can start to come together.   I'm probably worrying too much about this, but the thought of wailing away on the axle shaft to pop it loose bothers me.  it'll probably go easy and even if the cir-clip is damaged I can use

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-25 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes
I suspect that it will be fine. When the rear subframe mounts get dead rubber, you will know it. The car get squirrelly going over RR tracks, but is normal most of the time. Until it gets squirrelly going over tracks, I'd not worry about it, and even thern you probably have 1-5 years before

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-25 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Got a question regarding my rusted connection over the rear suspension:  I'm thinking that if I go through with replacing the wheel bearing carrier, maybe I can just ignore the rusty connection and drive?  After all, very few similar problems have been found but granted it's not a problem to

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
I couldn't find my old 1980s JC Whitney ball joint press so I bought a new Gearwrench one for the ball joints on the ML. The Gearwrench was better quality, and about the same $$ that I paid for the other one 30 years ago.

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Hi Mitch! That doesn't sound like a fun way to spend a weekend!  BTW, what you described is very much what I saw the mechanics doing in the videos - they were using a foreign language I didn't recognize but it may have been German.  The sound was pretty poor. They also used a shop made

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
We pull the carrier and use a press. Much faster, and I've never been able to get a hub out with a slide hammer. In my case they had been in there for 28 years. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
> On July 21, 2018 at 1:22 PM Larry Turner via Mercedes > wrote: > > Perhaps the Harbor Freight Bearing tools might make this a driveway > job?   BTW, I also watch a couple of videos showing slide hammers and > similar being used (w/a sledge hammer!) that looked like the mechanics > doing

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Thanks, BTW, I was browsing YouTube videos and came across this R Whl Brg R for a BMW - after watching I thought it was very much like the W124. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4PK1jXhppE Some of the fasteners are different and it doesn't have the 5 point rear deal like a 124 but the axle

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
You can check them in place -- jack up the car so you can reach the axle and rotate the shaft. If either end moves in relation to the joint, it's bad. They can go bad like my Golf though, and grind. You'd probably have to pull it to see if it's the wheel bearing or the axle joint unless it's

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Based on your description of the noises I am inclined to be confident the outer bearing is bad - we get a loud growling noise starting at 45mph or so and getting worse and speed increases. But I don't recall any vibrations on accel / decel or clunks as you describe. The CV joint is a question

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
A bad bearing can damage the wheel carrier, or at least "grow" enough to be very difficult to get out -- had that happen a time or two. Basically the bearing is a double row ball bearing with one side free (so it can be assembled) -- the axle nut holds it together. The nub is pressed into the

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-21 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Thanks Peter! I need to look at the WSM    again - I'm not understanding the hub completely.  Or I could pull a wheel and take a look - might be worth the time because I find the idea of replacing the carrier w/a used one interesting.  Then again, I'm not sure I would gain anything by using a

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-20 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
The bearing is pressed into the wheel carrier, and then the hub is pressed into the center of the bearing. Don't want you to end up with half of what you need, eh? Three parts there. The axle does indeed fit on a spline through the hub. It also holds the bearing together, so the nut needs

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-20 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Hi Peter, just to be sure I understand what you are saying when you wrote, "not just the hub that presses into the bearing." - I thought the bearing presses into the hub, not the other way around? Then the axle slides thru the center of the bearing..., no? I think it is easy for me to

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-20 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Max's comment about ASR helps because I don't have ASR - only ABS - so hopefully that's not going to be a concern.  But it looks like I should try to find parts from cars close in manufacture to mine to minimize problems and to state my 91 300D is non ASR. I've been looking at Car-Part.com

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-20 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Thanks Max - very helpful! On 07/17/2018 8:40 PM, Max Dillon via Mercedes wrote: Only the cars with ASR got 4 channel ABS. Most 124 are 3 channel, with third sensor at input to differential. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Max Dillon via Mercedes
I can't answer that, I'd have to look at the EPC to figure that out. -- Max Dillon Charleston SC '87 300TD '95 E300 On July 17, 2018 8:45:08 PM EDT, Mitch Haley via Mercedes wrote: > >> On July 17, 2018 at 8:40 PM Max Dillon via Mercedes > wrote: >> >> >> Only the cars with ASR got 4 channel

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
> On July 17, 2018 at 8:40 PM Max Dillon via Mercedes > wrote: > > > Only the cars with ASR got 4 channel ABS. Most 124 are 3 channel, with > third sensor at input to differential. Then why does Car-Part's exchange list 1995 rear knuckles as different from 1986-1994? Mitch.

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Max Dillon via Mercedes
Only the cars with ASR got 4 channel ABS. Most 124 are 3 channel, with third sensor at input to differential. -- Max Dillon Charleston SC '87 300TD '95 E300 ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes
yes, the gasser and Diesel rear axle carrier are the same. Wagons have a heavier duty bearing, I was told. Larry Turner via Mercedes wrote: Wow! They have a hub for a 300E for only $70 which I assume would be the same as the one I need for my 300D? This is the 1st time I have contacted

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
> On July 17, 2018 at 8:29 AM Larry Turner via Mercedes > wrote: > > > Hmmm, so a much newer part might fit?  When I look at Car-part.com, for the rear knuckle they give me parts ranging from a 1984 W201 to 1994 R129/W124/W202. The newest right rear knuckles available in the US that

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Hmmm, so a much newer part might fit?  And I could (maybe) use more modern links?   That'll take some extensive research to do that, but I agree completely that MB designed the W124 with future fit in mind. Having said that, the rear wheel carrier (which I have been calling it) is pretty

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Well, my reference books have failed me.  But if I inspect the high pressure lines going to/from the ABS controller under the hood it might tell me something, right?  If I have tubing going to each wheel rather than 1 for the differential shaft I will know the answer I suspect.  I recall the

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
The axle in the wagon is larger diameter than the sedan, but I think that's the only difference. And I suspect it's the same part in use today, MB is good at designing properly and then using common parts for a very long time. I think the rear suspension is exactly the same on current

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Thanks for the questions, I think it does have a sensor at each hub but will have to confirm that...  Not sure I woud consider my 91 to be a early 124 - maybe more a mid year? I have the Tech Data book I can check.  But I'll find the answer ;-) LarryT On 07/17/2018 7:14 AM, Mitch Haley via

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes
Did the early W124 have W201 style 3 channel ABS with the ABS sensor on the differential input shaft? And does your 1991 have a sensor on each hub? Mitch. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-17 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Hi Peter, Thanks for that!  BTW, I have found they are not consistent in the way they name their parts.  But I will be sure to ask that is it the Wheel Carrier and try to get a photo of the part before I buy.   I'm going to check EPC to see if there are any differences over the W124 years - I

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-16 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
Make sure it's the complete wheel carrier, not just the hub that presses into the bearing. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-16 Thread Larry Turner via Mercedes
Wow!  They have a hub for a 300E for only $70 which I assume would be the same as the one I need for my 300D? This is the 1st time I have contacted Car-Part.com but it won't be the last. Thanks again. LarryT 91 300D 2.5T On 07/14/2018 10:45 AM, Curley McLain via Mercedes wrote:

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-14 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes
car-part.com Larry Turner via Mercedes wrote: Hi Guys, for a change things are looking up. I tried to start the subject 300D and found the battery was dead and refused to take a charge. It was bought in 2014 and had almost 1000 CCA's but dead is dead. So I went into my garage (slowly as

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-13 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:21:17 -0400 Larry Turner via Mercedes wrote: > Anyone have one or know where I might find a hub?  I have been putting > out feelers to recyclers looking for hubs and  only got one specific > reply.  Besides, I like options.   ;-) Check out http://car-part.com/ Craig

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-13 Thread Max Dillon via Mercedes
Correct. -- Max Dillon Charleston SC '87 300TD '95 E300 On July 13, 2018 8:34:17 PM EDT, Buggered Benzmail via Mercedes wrote: >That’s a 124? > >--FT > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or

Re: [MBZ] My 91 300D Rear Hub etc.

2018-07-13 Thread Buggered Benzmail via Mercedes
That’s a 124? --FT Sent from iPhone > On Jul 13, 2018, at 8:21 PM, Larry Turner via Mercedes > wrote: > > Hi Guys, for a change things are looking up. I tried to start the subject > 300D and found the battery was dead and refused to take a charge. It was > bought in 2014 and had almost