Is qemu the only Winemu you've tried?
Have you tried wine, etc..?
Zedic
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
It seems than at Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:02:35 -0500, Jeff wrote:
Is qemu the only Winemu you've tried?
Have you tried wine, etc..?
Zedic
A while back I messed with bochs. Qemu is a lot easier.
Wine isn't an emulator. It doesn't work for most of the programs
I need to run - or I haven't
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Fmiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the definition of a bot is a robot computer running a
program that the own is unaware of...
Windows, mostly.
A wide-open Linux computer can act an a relay, but it takes
effort to turn it into a bot. Mac is probably
Amen, Brother! Well said.
The most important thing to remember on a Windows machine is, when the
choice presents itself, to never use XP Home and to always XP Pro to start
with (there are fundamental differences in the network and multi-user [ha ha
sorry] capabilities) and to *never* set
Thats probably a good idea. One question, how do you make the admin
account show up as a login account when it starts up and you click on
which user to log in as?
Ed Booher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Fmiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the definition of a bot is a robot
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Fmiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If the definition of a bot is a robot computer running a
program that the own is unaware of...
Windows, mostly.
A wide-open Linux computer can act an a relay, but it takes
effort to turn it into a bot. Mac is
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thats probably a good idea. One question, how do you make the admin
account show up as a login account when it starts up and you click on
which user to log in as?
You don't. Administrator is hidden for security
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Fmiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's easy in the Unix world (Linux, BSD, etc.) because there
is su, sudo, and fakeroot. Is there something like that in
MS Windows? Some way I can install a program without having to
log out of my current user and log in as
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Ed Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Fmiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's easy in the Unix world (Linux, BSD, etc.) because there
is su, sudo, and fakeroot. Is there something like that in
MS Windows? Some way I can
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Ed Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, one more thing I have to point out, the Run As option will not show up
on a file that is not an executable. This includes short cuts. You need to
right click on the actual .EXE or .MSI. Again, you can write a batch with
Harry Watkins wrote:
is so bad already that if you put a computer on the Internet with a raw
unpatched operating system http://appendum.com/#, the machine would be
compromised in minutes.
I was getting several warnings from Norton every day that some server
had tried to force a buffer overrun
Mitch, hopefully you're not depending on the built in Windows
firewall..if you are, get yourself a real firewallfor free...get
Zone Alarm
The windows firewall is very basic and easily bypassed by any noob hacker.
Zedic
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new
: [MBZ] OT Computer Zombot
Harry Watkins wrote:
is so bad already that if you put a computer on the Internet with a raw
unpatched operating system http://appendum.com/#, the machine would be
compromised in minutes.
I was getting several warnings from Norton every day that some server
had tried
Bill,
you'll want to go into the admin setup of your router and make sure
it's turned on. It should be but can also be offyou will want this
piece of mind, though.
Zedic
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:59:01 -0500, Harry Watkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The compromising danger that is out there now
is so bad already that if you put a computer on the Internet with a raw
unpatched operating system, the machine would be
compromised in minutes. In fact, testing has shown
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:24:21 -0400, Bill R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I still have my firewall turned off with the assumption that my wireless
router takes care of that function
It does, but defense-in-depth is a fundamental computer security
principle. Better to use both.
Allan
--
1983 300D
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff Zedic
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 8:24 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT Computer Zombot
Mitch, hopefully you're not depending on the built in Windows
firewall..if you are, get yourself a real firewallfor free
The heart of the problem is that most of the networking protocols were
designed in academic environments by and for people who understood them
and trusted each other.
If you ask me, the real heart of the problem lives in Redmond.
-- Jim
___
Yeah it really is more than that. I'd expand my statement to say that
the vast majority of software developers don't understand how to write
secure code. Microsoft has really improved their efforts over the last
few years, but there is so much legacy out there from the days when
security was an
Thanks Jeff, I'll do that
BillR
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff Zedic
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:26 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT Computer Zombot
Bill,
you'll want to go into the admin setup of your
20 matches
Mail list logo
