"John W. Reames III" wrote:
> Yeah. Then theres that pesky 10th amendment...
There is no 10th amendment. It was one of the first to go, before I
was born.
Mitch.
L PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?
"There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's
a prohibition against taking it away,&q
John W. Reames III wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Allan Streib wrote:
>> Well -- um. The actual text from Section 9 of the Constitution is:
>>
>> The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended,
>> unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may
>> requir
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Allan Streib wrote:
> Well -- um. The actual text from Section 9 of the Constitution is:
>
> The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended,
> unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may
> require it.
>
> So, it sounds to me l
ty and integrity are foreign concepts in those quarters, all that
counts in being in charge and not overseen by anyone.
Peter
-Original Message-
>From: "John W. Reames III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jan 24, 2007 8:59 AM
>To: Mercedes Discussion List
>Subject:
"John W. Reames III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jan 24, 2007 8:59 AM
>To: Mercedes Discussion List
>Subject: Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?
>
>On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Werner Fehlauer wrote:
>
>> John - there's a whole
> "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's
> a prohibition against taking it away," Gonzales said.
Well -- um. The actual text from Section 9 of the Constitution is:
The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended,
unless when in Cases of Rebelli
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Werner Fehlauer wrote:
> John - there's a whole lot of that kind of warped interpretation inside the
> beltway. The redeeming factor is that once you get 50 miles away from
> there, the common sense factor seems to go way up!
*lol* yeah thats because COOP sites for DC can'
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Lee Einer wrote:
> John W. Reames III wrote:
> > http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml
> >
> > "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a
> > prohibition against taking it away," Gonzales said.
> >
> > Don't you LOVE tri-state logic
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url:
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20070124/1c0b66cc/attachment.pl
Which action Gonzales has absolutely no problem with -- he's defended
imprisonment without charges many times. All for good reasons, of
course.
Too much lawyering, I think, he seems to have forgotten how to read
English.
Peter
ECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?
http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml
"There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a
prohibition against taking it away,&
Lee Einer wrote:
>
> Without habeus corpus, any one of us can be hauled off in the dead of
> night and "disappeared" for nothing more than having pissed off the
> powers that be.
You mean like they do in the United States?
Gonzales was one of the authors of that policy BTW.
Excuse me while I g
John W. Reames III wrote:
> http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml
>
> "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a
> prohibition against taking it away," Gonzales said.
>
> Don't you LOVE tri-state logic?
No. I don't. Habeus Corpus is a right which was es
http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml
"There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a
prohibition against taking it away," Gonzales said.
Don't you LOVE tri-state logic?
-j.
15 matches
Mail list logo
