Luther:
You'll be looking at 1986 and 1987. These were the only two model years for
the 300SDL. The 3.5 litre 350SDL was offered in 1990 and 1991.
-Scott
On 1/8/06, Luther Gulseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Very well put Dan. I have both and feel the same way. Though I am
looking for a la
Very well put Dan. I have both and feel the same way. Though I am
looking for a late 80's SDL as my permanent road car. The CD is a thril
to drive, and I'll never NOT own one.
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:06:44 -0600, Dan Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Go with a CD.
On Sat, 07 Jan 2
An 126 is not nearly as agile in the city as the 123. Feels HEAVY.
I give the agility nod to our 114/115/123 cars. The 126 just feels
more ponderous. And, oddly enough, so do the 107's. In feel they
seem to have more in common with the 126. And we have three of
them, so it's not like it's a
Dan Weeks wrote:
Go with a CD.
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 10:48:16 -0600, OK Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, a 617.952 in a 123.133 chassis (3515lb) ought to be faster
than a 617.951 in a 126.120 chassis (3625lb), if it's raw acceleration
you're after. Then the 240D can be used f
Go with a CD.
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 10:48:16 -0600, OK Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, a 617.952 in a 123.133 chassis (3515lb) ought to be faster
than a 617.951 in a 126.120 chassis (3625lb), if it's raw acceleration
you're after. Then the 240D can be used for chassis parts.
