Re: [MBZ] 87 300TD torque, horsepower and weight specs

2006-05-18 Thread Christopher McCann
Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus Subject: Re: [MBZ] 87 300TD torque

Re: [MBZ] 87 300TD torque, horsepower and weight specs

2006-05-18 Thread Christopher McCann
SoMine has the old trap removed, but replaced with the new oxidizing catalyst...does that mean I use the higher trap removed numbers, or the lower with trap numbers...or will it fall somewhere in between...or is it unknown? Chris Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher

Re: [MBZ] 87 300TD torque, horsepower and weight specs

2006-05-18 Thread Marshall Booth
Christopher McCann wrote: SoMine has the old trap removed, but replaced with the new oxidizing catalyst...does that mean I use the higher trap removed numbers, or the lower with trap numbers...or will it fall somewhere in between...or is it unknown? DOES YOUR CAR HAVE A TRAP? Marshall

Re: [MBZ] 87 300TD torque, horsepower and weight specs

2006-05-18 Thread Christopher McCann
no. OK, got it. Danke! Chris Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher McCann wrote: SoMine has the old trap removed, but replaced with the new oxidizing catalyst...does that mean I use the higher trap removed numbers, or the lower with trap numbers...or will it fall

Re: [MBZ] 87 300TD torque, horsepower and weight specs

2006-05-17 Thread Christopher McCann
lustig! :-) Zeitgeist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nicht genug On 5/17/06, Christopher McCann wrote: Anyone have this on hand or know where I can find it? Casey Olympia, WA Biodiesel: I drive in a persistent vegetative state '87 300TD intercooler #22 (214k) '84 300D (212k) Gashuffer: '89 Vanagon