Re: [MBZ] An question to start an oil debate

2023-10-15 Thread Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes
It was what was showing in the original manual for the car. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 15, 2023, at 6:10 PM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes > wrote: > > Was that a modern listing for a W123 or a rating for modern cars? > > -Curt > > > > > On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 06:41:06 PM EDT, MB

Re: [MBZ] An question to start an oil debate

2023-10-15 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
Was that a modern listing for a W123 or a rating for modern cars? -Curt On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 06:41:06 PM EDT, MB list etc via Mercedes wrote: Is it because the manual was referring to dino oil and almost all current oil is synthetic? I know that my OM616 and OM617 engines

Re: [MBZ] An question to start an oil debate

2023-10-15 Thread MB list etc via Mercedes
Is it because the manual was referring to dino oil and almost all current oil is synthetic? I know that my OM616 and OM617 engines would easily start down to 0° F with Mobil one back in the day vs very hard to start below freezing with Castrol 20w50. --- Original Message --- On

Re: [MBZ] An question to start an oil debate

2023-10-15 Thread Allan Streib via Mercedes
The original oil specs probably were not for synthetic. Synthetic 15W40 should be good for lower temperatures. On Sun, Oct 15, 2023, at 12:50, Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes wrote: > In looking thru the manuals on this 123, the manual shows 15w40 good > down to 23 where as later and I believe

[MBZ] An question to start an oil debate

2023-10-15 Thread Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes
In looking thru the manuals on this 123, the manual shows 15w40 good down to 23 where as later and I believe current oil charts show it good down to 5 IIRC. Why such a big difference from back in the old days? Is 15w40 today that much better and can be used at lower temps than 15w40 from 40