Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-07 Thread andrew strasfogel
Does everyone agree with this? If true, is there any practical way to bypass the starter?? On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin ka...@striplin.netwrote: If the starter is not spinning as fast at it should, this test means nothing at all. andrew strasfogel wrote: I need a

Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-07 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Bypass the starter? for what? Thats about like saying bypass the engine to make the car go. andrew strasfogel wrote: Does everyone agree with this? If true, is there any practical way to bypass the starter?? -- Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK 95 E300, 94 S500, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92

[MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-06 Thread andrew strasfogel
I need a second opinion on the following account of a compression test from the seller of a 1985 300TD wagon. He himself is a tech and administered the test (he's not a Mercedes tech). Here are the compression results (the highest reading from each cylinder) with a warm engine, jumped battery

Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-06 Thread John Robbins
On 7/6/2010 2:33 PM, andrew strasfogel wrote: Cylinder 1- 220-225 2- 220 3- 200 4- 210 5- 230 My mechanic says the readings are way too low to allow the engine to start in cold temps due to worn rings. He says a new engine rates at 400, and that 275 is the absolute limit. Any comments?

Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-06 Thread Rolf
Those numbers are way to low. Stuck rings, junk engine or leaky testing. -Rolf On 07/06/2010 03:33 PM, andrew strasfogel wrote: I need a second opinion on the following account of a compression test from the seller of a 1985 300TD wagon. He himself is a tech and administered the test (he's

Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-06 Thread andrew strasfogel
How would one confirm leaky testing? On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Rolf r...@winmutt.com wrote: Those numbers are way to low. Stuck rings, junk engine or leaky testing. -Rolf On 07/06/2010 03:33 PM, andrew strasfogel wrote: I need a second opinion on the following account of a

Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-06 Thread John Robbins
On 7/6/2010 3:38 PM, andrew strasfogel wrote: How would one confirm leaky testing? Don't risk it and assume junk engine or stuck rings? John ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives

Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-06 Thread Mitch Haley
andrew strasfogel wrote: Here are the compression results (the highest reading from each cylinder) with a warm engine, jumped battery [after a valve adjustment]. On #3 the adapter fitting was leaking so re-tested most if not all by snugging up the adapter with a socket first, this evened things

Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-06 Thread Rolf Martin-Hoster
The Harbor Freight models were known for leaks. Still I would assume that is a relatively correct reading. However, if the price is right its a core on a SLS head. -Rolf andrew strasfogel wrote: How would one confirm leaky testing? On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Rolf r...@winmutt.com

Re: [MBZ] Interpreting compression test results for W123 turbodiesel engine

2010-07-06 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
If the starter is not spinning as fast at it should, this test means nothing at all. andrew strasfogel wrote: I need a second opinion on the following account of a compression test from the seller of a 1985 300TD wagon. He himself is a tech and administered the test (he's not a Mercedes