Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-12 Thread Fmiser
rumor has it that Jim wrote:

> The LM317
> is an active regulator, it's not a simple resistor, so it'll figure
> out exactly how much voltage to drop.  It's not an ideal device,
> so it wouldn't even work right unless it gets to drop some voltage.
> (Look up its minimum required headroom.)

As I recall, the LM317 must drop at least 1.5V, so while not a great
device for battery operated devices, I think it's a reasonable choice
for this project. It's also sturdy and self-protecting. If the supply
voltage gets too high and the regulator is trying to dump too much
heat, it will drop the output voltage till the current draw decreases
enough that it's again safe. As long as the voltages stay with the
correct polarity, those regulators are tought to kill.

I haven't gone back to look at all the posts, but if the LM317 is set
up as a _current_ regulator, then the LED should always be happy.

--Philip



Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-11 Thread Jim Cathey
Most of the instructions I've found say to stay under 12v so I'd want 
3 LEDs, 9.9v so my resistor or LM317 has only to waste 2.1v right?


Yes.  And right there is your gross efficiency calculation.
You can measure the exact voltage drops and current draw once
you've built it and get an exact figure.


The "forward current" of the units I'm looking at is 5-30mA.
So does the resistor or LM317 match the current draw of the LEDs
independently or in aggregate?


Neither, anything wired in series _must_ draw the same current.
That's basic electricity, a guy named Kirchoff formalized it.

Worst case I'm looking at 180mA right? (3x30 each for the LEDs *2 if 
the resistor/M317 pulls the aggregate)


No, worst case you're looking at 30mA.  Everything gets 30 (or whatever)
mA, voltage is the only variable.  (And it _will_ vary.)  But the
LED's have a fairly steep voltage/current curve, so call it a
constant at the current levels that will generate useful lighting.
Let's say 3.6V.  Any voltage in excess of what the LED's stack up
to _must_ be burned in the regulator.  And it will be.  The LM317
is an active regulator, it's not a simple resistor, so it'll figure
out exactly how much voltage to drop.  It's not an ideal device,
so it wouldn't even work right unless it gets to drop some voltage.
(Look up its minimum required headroom.)

Pretend this is a 240D series glow plug system.  The GP's are the
LED's and the toaster racks/salt shaker is the LM317 assembly.
Does that help?

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-11 Thread Curt Raymond

I think I'm starting to get this now...

Your description seems to indicate I'm only using one LED right?
So if the LEDs are 3.2-3.4v each I could assume 3.3 right?
Most of the instructions I've found say to stay under 12v so I'd want 3 LEDs, 
9.9v so my resistor or LM317 has only to waste 2.1v right?
The "forward current" of the units I'm looking at is 5-30mA.
So does the resistor or LM317 match the current draw of the LEDs independently 
or in aggregate?
Worst case I'm looking at 180mA right? (3x30 each for the LEDs *2 if the 
resistor/M317 pulls the aggregate)

Thanks

-Curt

Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:36:54 -0600
From: Craig McCluskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:19:44 -0700 Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> > How much power am I really wasting at the resistor or LM317? I want 
to
> > 
> > come in under 5w, how much do I plan for at the resistor?
> 
> Given that you aim to run the LED's at a specified current, you can 
get
> awfully close just by using Ohm's law, in this case P-I^2R.  For the
> LM317, also you lose 1.5I in it as well.

Actually, he wants P=IE, where I is the current drawn by the LED and E 
is
the voltage across the LED (for power dissipated in the LED) or the
voltage across the LM317 (for the power dissipated in the LM317). The
internal bias current of the LM317 will be insignificant compared with 
the
current of the LED.

That said, the LM317 is performing like an electronic resistor.

If you have 1 amp flowing though the LED and 3 volts across it, the 
power
dissipated in the LED will be 3 watts. If you're running it from 12 
volts,
the voltage across the LM317 or resistor will be 9 volts. The 1 amp
current will cause it to dissipate 9 watts.

The total power draw from the battery will be 12 watts, implying the
efficiency to light the LED is 3/12 = 25% (rather low).

There are a lot of switchmode regulators used to light up strings of 
LEDs.
I've seen several advertisements at http://www.electronicproducts.com/,
but don't recall any specifically at the moment.

Coincidentally, their featured product today is,

85-lumen LED-based MR16 lamp replaces incandescents
http://www.electronicproducts.com/ShowPage.asp?SECTION=&PRIMID=&FileName=hlap01.jun2007.html

It has a 4 watt emitter and takes 12 volts AC/DC at 0.7 amps (8.4 
watts,
which implies an efficiency of 48%).

Craig

   
-
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels 
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 13:16:34 2007
Received: from postal.windwireless.net ([199.164.167.12]
helo=mail.windwireless.net)
by server8.arterytc8.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1Hbcgb-0003jN-8j
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:16:33 +
Received: from windwireless.net (unverified [206.63.94.197]) 
by windwireless.net (WindPostal) with ESMTP id 2623747 
for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:18:17 -0700
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
From: Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-412260344
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 240D Knocking
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Unsubscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:16:34 -

> I just changed the fuel filters in both cars.  Should I wait a few K 
> miles
> until it's time to replace them, or go ahead with the Diesel Purge now 
> and
> replace the filters later?

You shouldn't have to change the filters, you purge by putting both
fuel lines into the bottle.  The tank is not involved.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-11 Thread Jim Cathey
How much power am I really wasting at the resistor or LM317? I want 
to

come in under 5w, how much do I plan for at the resistor?


Given that you aim to run the LED's at a specified current, you can 
get

awfully close just by using Ohm's law, in this case P-I^2R.  For the
LM317, also you lose 1.5I in it as well.


Actually, he wants P=IE, where I is the current drawn by the LED and E 
is

the voltage across the LED (for power dissipated in the LED) or the
voltage across the LM317 (for the power dissipated in the LM317). The
internal bias current of the LM317 will be insignificant compared with 
the

current of the LED.


He wanted to know how much power was lost in the regulation, versus
the power sent to the lamps.  There is no internal bias current to
consider in the circuit that was given.  (No independent path to
ground.)  I stand by my math, if the right values are plugged in.


That said, the LM317 is performing like an electronic resistor.


Exactly.  That's what's wrong with it when you're running on
batteries.  Nice parts, otherwise.

If you have 1 amp flowing though the LED and 3 volts across it, the 
power
dissipated in the LED will be 3 watts. If you're running it from 12 
volts,

the voltage across the LM317 or resistor will be 9 volts. The 1 amp
current will cause it to dissipate 9 watts.


The given circuit used 3x3.6V white LED's in series.  9 watts is HOT!
Compare it to the usual 10W trunk bulb of our beloved steeds.  In such
a case you'd be better served by just _using_ that bulb in a suitable
fixture.  Would make a dandy reading light.  I believe the LED's in
question were very much sub-amp in current draw, however.  Heating
of the regulator was not the concern, but rather energy lost to heat
and not light from the battery.


The total power draw from the battery will be 12 watts, implying the
efficiency to light the LED is 3/12 = 25% (rather low).


My rough (no calculator) figuring had the LM317 circuit at about 75%.
Not bad, but not as good as the 90% of the switchmode regulator I
later posted a link to.

It has a 4 watt emitter and takes 12 volts AC/DC at 0.7 amps (8.4 
watts,

which implies an efficiency of 48%).


If it has an internal switchmode regulator all bets are off on 
efficiency.

If it uses resistive techniques then you are correct.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-11 Thread Craig McCluskey
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:19:44 -0700 Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> > How much power am I really wasting at the resistor or LM317? I want to
> > 
> > come in under 5w, how much do I plan for at the resistor?
> 
> Given that you aim to run the LED's at a specified current, you can get
> awfully close just by using Ohm's law, in this case P-I^2R.  For the
> LM317, also you lose 1.5I in it as well.

Actually, he wants P=IE, where I is the current drawn by the LED and E is
the voltage across the LED (for power dissipated in the LED) or the
voltage across the LM317 (for the power dissipated in the LM317). The
internal bias current of the LM317 will be insignificant compared with the
current of the LED.

That said, the LM317 is performing like an electronic resistor.

If you have 1 amp flowing though the LED and 3 volts across it, the power
dissipated in the LED will be 3 watts. If you're running it from 12 volts,
the voltage across the LM317 or resistor will be 9 volts. The 1 amp
current will cause it to dissipate 9 watts.

The total power draw from the battery will be 12 watts, implying the
efficiency to light the LED is 3/12 = 25% (rather low).

There are a lot of switchmode regulators used to light up strings of LEDs.
I've seen several advertisements at http://www.electronicproducts.com/,
but don't recall any specifically at the moment.

Coincidentally, their featured product today is,

85-lumen LED-based MR16 lamp replaces incandescents
http://www.electronicproducts.com/ShowPage.asp?SECTION=&PRIMID=&FileName=hlap01.jun2007.html

It has a 4 watt emitter and takes 12 volts AC/DC at 0.7 amps (8.4 watts,
which implies an efficiency of 48%).

Craig



Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-10 Thread Jim Cathey
How much power am I really wasting at the resistor or LM317? I want to 
come in under 5w, how much do I plan for at the resistor?


Given that you aim to run the LED's at a specified current, you can get
awfully close just by using Ohm's law, in this case P-I^2R.  For the
LM317, also you lose 1.5I in it as well.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-10 Thread Curt Raymond

Looks cool. I don't understand hardly any of it but it looks cool...

How much power am I really wasting at the resistor or LM317? I want to come in 
under 5w, how much do I plan for at the resistor?

Anybody seen the Wallace and Grommit short films? I need a copy of "electronics 
for dogs"...

-Curt

Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:04:30 -0700
From: Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

Check out this application note:
AN-H48 Buck-based LED Drivers using the HV9910
http://www.supertex.com/pdf/app_notes/AN-H48.pdf

Looks like a way to get 90% power supply efficiency,
if the design is carefully done.

-- Jim

   
-
8:00? 8:25? 8:40?  Find a flick in no time
 with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 15:33:40 2007
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243])
by server8.arterytc8.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1HbILk-0002dw-FW
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:33:40 +
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so2047918ana
for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.32.1 with SMTP id f1mr4961293anf.1176219214622;
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.167.15 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:33:34 -0500
From: "Hans Neureiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List" 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Subject: [MBZ] 124 shaking in neutral, more observations
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Unsubscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:33:40 -

Some more careful observations showed that if I kill the engine at
high enough speed, the thing gets quiet.
There is also a noticeable high amplitude vibration (the sunroof
rattles) when sitting idling at a stop with the tranny in drive. Take
it to neutral, the rpm does not change, but it gets quiet.
Motor mounts, perhaps ?

On 4/5/07, Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Killed the engine, no change.
>
> That should pretty much eliminate anything forwards of
> the middle of the transmission.
>
> -- Jim
>
>
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>


-- 
Hans Neureiter, Houston, TX
'82 300SD, '95 E300D



Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-10 Thread Luther

Do they have them in standard LED cases?  I'd like to try a couple in the dash
of my Benz's 


--
Luther   KB5QHUAlma, Ark
'87 300SDL (271,xxx mi) needs head
'83 300SD (245 kmi) For Sale
'82 300CD (166 kmi)
'82 300D  (74 kmi) getting '85 donor engine
'85 300D (280,176) parts car-sans engine



Quoting John Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Jim Cathey wrote:

If you're dead set on LEDs... look into anything that uses Luxeon
LEDs...  I've played with a 3W one... was VERY bright.  The datasheet
says they output 70-80 lumens.  You'd need a 12V to 3V supply though. 



They look fairly persnickety about what you feed them.  Best to
be careful, I think they run them right on the ragged edge of death. 



I bought one just to tinker with... dumped 3V and 1A into it (current
controlled benchtop supply), and it didn't complain. Couldn't look near
it either... 


Could always use it at 50% rated power... ;-)

John







Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-10 Thread Jim Cathey

Check out this application note:
AN-H48 Buck-based LED Drivers using the HV9910
http://www.supertex.com/pdf/app_notes/AN-H48.pdf

Looks like a way to get 90% power supply efficiency,
if the design is carefully done.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-10 Thread Jim Cathey
So I spent some time looking at different solutions yesterday and 
discovered that otherpower.com has instructions for making LED lights.


Yes, just know that their power circuits are resistive in nature
(even the constant-current LM317 supply) and operate by burning
excess voltage as heat.  I've yet to see a switching regulator
for LED lighting, though I'm sure they exist.  That would be
best for battery-operated systems.

For example, a 3-LED string runs about 10+ volts, about what
you get from a 'completely dead' 12V lead-acid battery, so the
excess voltage will be burned as heat.  Assuming a fully charged
voltage of 14V, perhaps 25% of the battery's capacity will be
wasted in the resistors and/or LM317.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-10 Thread Curt Raymond

So I spent some time looking at different solutions yesterday and discovered 
that otherpower.com has instructions for making LED lights.
Then I found I could buy the LEDs themselves on eBay very inexpensively.
So right now it looks like I'll build my own light. For like $20 you get 50 
(yes fifty) LEDs. Then I head over to Radioshack to get some breadboard and 
parts to build a powersupply.
I'll wire up the LEDs in groups of 3 and then figure how many groups of 3 I 
need to get the light output I want. Right now I'm thinking 3 groups of 3 but 
we'll see how it goes.
Then later down the road if I decide I don't like the color temperature its 
easy peasy to add a couple different color bulbs and get it just right...

-Curt

Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:58:31 -0500
From: John Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Curt Raymond wrote:
> I think perhaps you're a bit behind on the current LED technology. 
I'm looking at http://store.sundancesolar.com/12v18ledbufo.html
> Its only 40 lumens but that seems to compare well, I found a chart 
with a 15w CF that produces 105 lumens.
> This will only be a reading lamp, I've been using a small battery 
powered flourescent lamp for awhile. Its okay but not great, not focused 
enough really.
>   

Just to throw in my $.02  I'd look into CCFL lights that are 
typically used for case mods, etc.  White ones do exist, but are harder 
to come by than the colored ones.  No idea on wattage or anything 
though...  I think they are certainly bright enough at least (or would 
be with a simple reflector for half of it). 

If you're dead set on LEDs... look into anything that uses Luxeon 
LEDs...  I've played with a 3W one... was VERY bright.  The datasheet 
says they output 70-80 lumens.  You'd need a 12V to 3V supply though. 

http://www.luxeon.com/products/line.cfm?lineId=2

They have brighter ones too... 

G'luck with it!  Little projects like these are great fun :-)

John

 
-
8:00? 8:25? 8:40?  Find a flick in no time
 with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 13:14:49 2007
Received: from web32805.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.206.35])
by server8.arterytc8.net with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1HbGBN-0003s0-2C
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:14:49 +
Received: (qmail 40924 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Apr 2007 13:14:44 -
X-YMail-OSG: 
LrKrhasVM1k0NFV__AaePgquU.blVFenJIAMuR8HmoutZ4FcpJkl6XXc9DIpbZ.Lk6hjzn_oqbKqWBNlxKGCq03pmdUEv1.45qPfThisaqGz7GC78Yok3OtjqoJ_Ng--
Received: from [198.51.119.130] by web32805.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:14:44 PDT
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Curt Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Diesel List 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9.cp2
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Unsubscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:14:49 -


Oh and again I'm stuck on LEDs for 2 reasons:
1. They're neat
B. They'll last a long long time and don't react badly to cold temps.
CF bulbs in a rustic camp setting in the middle of the winter are not such a 
great thing...

-Curt

 
 
-
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel 
bargains.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 13:20:58 2007
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.225])
by server8.arterytc8.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1HbGHK-00047z-1c
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:20:58 +
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i22so1098092wra
for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.183.1 with SMTP id g1mr2793263waf.1176211252308;
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.58.4 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL 

Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-10 Thread Mitch Haley


Jim Cathey wrote:
> 
> > If you're dead set on LEDs... look into anything that uses Luxeon
> > LEDs...  I've played with a 3W one... was VERY bright.  The datasheet
> > says they output 70-80 lumens.  You'd need a 12V to 3V supply though.
> 
> They look fairly persnickety about what you feed them.  Best to
> be careful, I think they run them right on the ragged edge of death.

They do run right on the edge, that is why a constant current (not constant
voltage) pwm supply is required. Might be interesting to see what the input
voltage limit is on the typical Luxeon Star setup. Heatsinking is important too.



Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-10 Thread John Robbins

Jim Cathey wrote:

If you're dead set on LEDs... look into anything that uses Luxeon
LEDs...  I've played with a 3W one... was VERY bright.  The datasheet
says they output 70-80 lumens.  You'd need a 12V to 3V supply though.



They look fairly persnickety about what you feed them.  Best to
be careful, I think they run them right on the ragged edge of death.
  


I bought one just to tinker with... dumped 3V and 1A into it (current 
controlled benchtop supply), and it didn't complain. Couldn't look near 
it either...  

Could always use it at 50% rated power... ;-) 


John



Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-09 Thread John Robbins

Curt Raymond wrote:

I think perhaps you're a bit behind on the current LED technology. I'm looking 
at http://store.sundancesolar.com/12v18ledbufo.html
Its only 40 lumens but that seems to compare well, I found a chart with a 15w 
CF that produces 105 lumens.
This will only be a reading lamp, I've been using a small battery powered 
flourescent lamp for awhile. Its okay but not great, not focused enough really.
  


Just to throw in my $.02  I'd look into CCFL lights that are 
typically used for case mods, etc.  White ones do exist, but are harder 
to come by than the colored ones.  No idea on wattage or anything 
though...  I think they are certainly bright enough at least (or would 
be with a simple reflector for half of it). 

If you're dead set on LEDs... look into anything that uses Luxeon 
LEDs...  I've played with a 3W one... was VERY bright.  The datasheet 
says they output 70-80 lumens.  You'd need a 12V to 3V supply though. 


http://www.luxeon.com/products/line.cfm?lineId=2

They have brighter ones too... 


G'luck with it!  Little projects like these are great fun :-)

John



Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-09 Thread Curt Raymond

I think perhaps you're a bit behind on the current LED technology. I'm looking 
at http://store.sundancesolar.com/12v18ledbufo.html
Its only 40 lumens but that seems to compare well, I found a chart with a 15w 
CF that produces 105 lumens.
This will only be a reading lamp, I've been using a small battery powered 
flourescent lamp for awhile. Its okay but not great, not focused enough really.

Of course the problem with that bulb is its price. $35 is alot to pay to find 
out I don't like it...
The next choice is a 9w cf which is probably more like 80 lumens although I can 
find no real documentation on that.
Even then I should have some more charging capacity although you're right I'll 
probably only use the light for 2-3 hours a night so I should have plenty of 
reserve...

-Curt

Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 07:29:45 -0700
From: Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

> ACK! Incandescent...
> How much light do you think I can get off an incandescent bulb for 
2w?
> Thats the whole point of the LED bulb, lighting using only a 5w solar 
> panel...

Before I did much more I'd really want to try out the proposed
light source to see if it was really suitable for reading.  The
incandescents we use in the camper are very satisfactory.  Then
there is also duty cycle, how much reading versus recharging time
do you expect?  If the stay is not indefinite you can even afford
to run at a bit of a loss.

The last time I looked fluorescent lamps were still king of the
lumen/watt rating.  That's been awhile now.  But there are some
very interesting CF lamps in the surplus market that come from
laptop screen backlights.  Have to factor in the inverter's
efficiency though.

A LED doesn't eat 12V, so you have to look at how you're planning
to power it.  Burning it in a simple resistor would mean that you'd
only get 1/4 the battery life you should.  Need a PWM feed to keep
it efficient.

Incandescent offers the advantages of extreme simplicity and a
satisfactorily wide illumination pattern, but at an efficiency
cost.  If you're stuck with a 2W bulb you're talking about one
of the dashboard lights.  That still might be OK, you'd have to
try it out, and you'd definitely want a good reflector head.

-- Jim

 
-
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
 Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.  
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 09 20:55:41 2007
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.225])
by server8.arterytc8.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1Hb0to-0002qs-MN
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:55:41 +
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id n29so1196818nzf
for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.18.1 with SMTP id v1mr2474756wai.1176152132445;
Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.58.4 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:55:32 -0400
From: "andrew strasfogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List" 
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9.cp2
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Off Topic Acura's
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Unsubscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:55:42 -

If you tell us the asking price we can opine intelligently on whether it is
a good buy or not.



On 4/9/07, Sunil Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They're awesome cars - handle well (not as well as a 124, but you're not
> paying MB prices either), good mileage, very reliable.  Esp. the later
> model
> years.  Watch out for rear wheel well rust (bane of Honda/Acura) and make
> sure the timing belt was changed every 90Kmi.
>
> In other words, have the timing belt changed before you buy it.
>

Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-09 Thread Jim Cathey

cost.  If you're stuck with a 2W bulb you're talking about one
of the dashboard lights.  That still might be OK, you'd have to
try it out, and you'd definitely want a good reflector head.


Oh, and the common Malibu outdoor low-voltage lighting bulb
is 4W at 12V.  Those are readily available and cheap.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-09 Thread Jim Cathey

ACK! Incandescent...
How much light do you think I can get off an incandescent bulb for 2w?
Thats the whole point of the LED bulb, lighting using only a 5w solar 
panel...


Before I did much more I'd really want to try out the proposed
light source to see if it was really suitable for reading.  The
incandescents we use in the camper are very satisfactory.  Then
there is also duty cycle, how much reading versus recharging time
do you expect?  If the stay is not indefinite you can even afford
to run at a bit of a loss.

The last time I looked fluorescent lamps were still king of the
lumen/watt rating.  That's been awhile now.  But there are some
very interesting CF lamps in the surplus market that come from
laptop screen backlights.  Have to factor in the inverter's
efficiency though.

A LED doesn't eat 12V, so you have to look at how you're planning
to power it.  Burning it in a simple resistor would mean that you'd
only get 1/4 the battery life you should.  Need a PWM feed to keep
it efficient.

Incandescent offers the advantages of extreme simplicity and a
satisfactorily wide illumination pattern, but at an efficiency
cost.  If you're stuck with a 2W bulb you're talking about one
of the dashboard lights.  That still might be OK, you'd have to
try it out, and you'd definitely want a good reflector head.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-09 Thread Curt Raymond

ACK! Incandescent...

How much light do you think I can get off an incandescent bulb for 2w?

Thats the whole point of the LED bulb, lighting using only a 5w solar panel...

-Curt
 
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 13:20:38 -0700
From: Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

> So the question: could I take a conventional light fixture and run 
12v 
> through it as long as I'm using a 12v bulb?

Absolutely.  I'd be in favor of finding one of those 'tensor' style 
lamps
that already use 12V incandescent bulbs.  I bought a couple of those 
for
our camper and removed the 12V transformers in the base.  They work
wonderfully.

-- Jim

 
-
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 09 13:35:27 2007
Received: from web32811.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.206.41])
by server8.arterytc8.net with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1Hau1k-00029M-UY
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:35:26 +
Received: (qmail 45086 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Apr 2007 13:35:19 -
X-YMail-OSG: 
6W0zB5gVM1mAmYhMi4h2wArTf_NRHCMrnTvVTS2AmX_B2CUQbn6JB28ld_F_ub1NfQp2L.OXfMV1GODT3.0ei.5Mxp8Mb0f_rH68I10B5EOjMw1XQu.P_FFwX4uU4Q--
Received: from [198.51.119.130] by web32811.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:35:19 PDT
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 06:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Curt Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Diesel List 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9.cp2
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Unsubscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:35:27 -


LOL, Caribou.
Theres a Coastie station at Easton I think, not terribly far away.

-Curt

Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 19:03:42 -0500
From: "LT Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting
To: "Mercedes Discussion List" 
Message-ID:
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

More importantly, WHERE in Maine. I've probably been there.

 
-
The fish are biting.
 Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 09 13:38:18 2007
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([63.240.77.82])
by server8.arterytc8.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1Hau4Y-0002PG-DE
for mercedes@okiebenz.com; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:38:18 +
Received: from aceraspire (c-69-243-211-95.hsd1.va.comcast.net[69.243.211.95])
by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP
id <20070409133802012006af19e>; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:38:13 +
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "LarryT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List" 
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:37:56 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Subject: Re: [MBZ] A New Level of Gutlessness
X-BeenThere: mercedes@okiebenz.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9.cp2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List 
List-Unsubscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com>, 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:38:18 -

Check the air filter - when last changed?  Also the fuel filters.  Its 
possible the IP was not adjusted properly.

La

Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-09 Thread OK Don

Yup - sounds like a good plan to me. Go for it. I guess the only
question would be whether the beam width of the LED will be adequate
for lighting the whole page.

On 4/8/07, Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So the question: could I take a conventional light fixture and run 12v
> through it as long as I'm using a 12v bulb?

Absolutely.  I'd be in favor of finding one of those 'tensor' style
lamps
that already use 12V incandescent bulbs.  I bought a couple of those for
our camper and removed the 12V transformers in the base.  They work
wonderfully.

-- Jim


--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just
sit there."
Will Rogers
'90 300D, '87 300SDL, '81 240D, '78 450SLC, '97 Ply Grand Voyager



Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-09 Thread LT Don

More importantly, WHERE in Maine. I've probably been there.

On 4/8/07, Curt Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Here's one of those ideas I might be shy to float in person...

We've got a little camp in Maine, totally backwoods, woodstove, gas
lights, you get the idea.
On the last couple trips I've been frustrated with trying to read by
flashlight in my bunk. The bunk is arranged such that the gas lights are of
no use and I can't put a gas light up there because I'd either wack it or
catch the roof on fire. I hate flashlights mostly because of the directional
nature of the beam and replacing the battery.

So I'm thinking to get a 12v LED reading light bulb(2watt), a 12v garden
tractor battery and use a 5 watt solar panel I already have to make myself a
reading light.
I found a site that has the bulb for a somewhat reasonable price
(considering it should last a long time) and even in a kit with a fixture.
The fixture seems to just be a conventional light fixture with a cigar
lighter type plug for which they want $40.
So the question: could I take a conventional light fixture and run 12v
through it as long as I'm using a 12v bulb?

To head off questions, 12v because the inverter would waste alot of power
and make noise. LED because CF bulbs wouldn't work well in the cold and yes
sometimes I am up reading but too lazy to stoke the fire. I intend to leave
the 2 prong connector on the lamp so extension cords will be easier. With a
5w panel I don't think I'll need a charge controller and a 10ah (or whatever
they are) garden tractor battery should run my light for a long time.
Assuming it works well and my folks want lights like it I'd step up to maybe
a 20w panel and charge controller.

-Curt


-
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com





--
LT Don
The Crazy Coastie


Re: [MBZ] OT: 12v lighting

2007-04-08 Thread Jim Cathey
So the question: could I take a conventional light fixture and run 12v 
through it as long as I'm using a 12v bulb?


Absolutely.  I'd be in favor of finding one of those 'tensor' style 
lamps

that already use 12V incandescent bulbs.  I bought a couple of those for
our camper and removed the 12V transformers in the base.  They work
wonderfully.

-- Jim