> OK Don wrote:
>
> Maybe I gave up too soon, but I did not get
> acceptable results using Photoshop to color correct the
> reversed negatives. That mask was just too much for me.
> That's what I'm hoping Vuescan will do for me.
When I was doing a bunch of them, I use ImageMagick, a
command line
> OK wrote:
>
> Can you use Vuescan with images acquired via a camera
> instead of a scanner? I plan to use my Nikon D700 camera
> like I used to use the F3 for duplicating slides, etc.
I don't know what Vuescan can do. But I have used my
"little" Canon camera to get a digital copy of hundreds
Yes, I am going to try LEDs for the light source, but will compare the
results with incandescent light. I just want to avoid the heat of the bulb
in the inverted color head that I use. Maybe I gave up too soon, but I did
not get acceptable results using Photoshop to color correct the reversed
Can you use Vuescan with images acquired via a camera instead of a scanner?
I plan to use my Nikon D700 camera like I used to use the F3 for
duplicating slides, etc.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Peter Frederick via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> Vuescan works well for Eastman (or
Yes, you can process images acquired from other sources. Haven't done
much of that, but it can be done.
Peter
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Vuescan works well for Eastman (or other pre-programmed) films, but if
there isn't a profile it can take quite a while to get good color.
Needless to say, I have all sorts of strange films that are not on the
list.
The thing I like the best is the ability to control contrast, it's
I've been using VueScan on negatives exclusively. Using everything on auto has
produced decent results in almost all cases, which involve several generations
of Eastman Color Negative film.
> -Original Message-
> From: OK > Don via Mercedes
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:24 PM
I processed Ektachrome (E4) at home a few times when I was a high schooler and
had a darkroom set up in the back room of our shop. I did it mainly with IR
Ektachrome, as it caused the developer to expire rather quickly so the
commercial processors wouldn’t process it. I knew a guy who
Oh, yeah - all that. I took pics years ago but we threw all that away.
Nobody cares about our images. Seriously.
Youtube is the name of today and tech. Images? - not so much.
mao
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives
d...@penoff.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 34mm Negative Scanner - Digital ICE Rocks
What Peter said.
Vuescan is great, and a real deal for the price. I haven’t found anything that
works better or has more flexibility for setting up workflows wi
The blue shift was processing, the pH of the color developer affects
the blue/yellow balance in Kodak films (and for fun, the green/
magenta balance in Fuji films, which is why the advice one should NOT
process the two on the same machine, when it was right for one the
other was terrible).
I agree on the ICE. I bought a Nikon super coolscan 4000 a couple
of years ago and love it.
Manfred
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 22:01:41 -0500
From: "Scott Ritchey"
About a month ago, I bought a reconditioned (guaranteed for a
year) Nikon
LS-2000 on eBay; that Nikon
I processed E-6 both in our home darkroom and at the lab at work. LOTS of
it. We also still have 10-12 rolls of 35mm B IR film in the freezer. Our
kids liked to play with it, then all moved away and quit photography for
many years.
Now Dan, the processors couldn't read the codes on that IR film
35MM?
Keep them in a cool ad dry location away from light.
Send them off to someone to have them scanned into electronic files for
archival purposes.
Ansel Dan
> On Nov 25, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes
> wrote:
>
> I have a TON of Agfa slides from
Scan them if you can, they fade in the dark and really go fast in the
light.
Keep them dry, as cool as possible (dessicated frozen is best) and
hope someone cares about them when you are gone.
Peter
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives
I have a TON of Agfa slides from the 60s and early 70s. What should I do
with them?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Mountain Man via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> Oh, yeah - all that. I took pics years ago but we threw all that away.
> Nobody cares about our images. Seriously.
Haha, my mother and I have thousands of images, many of them quite old
(she started taking pictures during WWII, and started using Kodachrome
in 1949).
The black and white are OK, although the camera tended to leak light,
so some of them are a pain, but the old Kodachromes are a real pain
What Peter said.
Vuescan is great, and a real deal for the price. I haven’t found anything that
works better or has more flexibility for setting up workflows with a scanner.
Dad moved over the Ektachrome in the late 50s, early 60s, and the emulsion on
those really took a beating from the
I bought a Nikon 4000 slide scanner some years ago for a significant sum (it
was used, but still expensive) to scan the 20 some odd carousel trays of slides
my Dad took over his lifetime. Mom was in charge of maintaining the archive,
which was a bad thing, as she kept them stored in her barn…
I played around a lot with weird film stock. We had a great Kodak
commercial place downtown called Hoosier Photo that had all sorts of
weird stuff. I liked both the IR B and Ektachrome when I could
get it. Not easy to handle, but fun to play with and some really
bizarre results depending
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: 34mm Negative Scanner - Digital ICE Rocks
What Peter said.
Vuescan is great, and a real deal for the price. I haven't found
anything that works better or has more flexibility for setting up
workflows with a scanner.
Dad moved over the Ektachrome in the l
I have a TON of Agfa slides from the 60s and early 70s. What should I do
with them?
Burn em or send em to the national archives.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options
After retirement, I planned to scan my many old negatives to digital. I
have several thousand frames from the 60s through the 90s that I wanted to
save.
The first scanner I tried (a PlusTek 7200) worked OK but it highlighted
every scratch and dust spec and I had to position each frame
Very good - thanks for the review. I also have 10's of thousands, if not
100's, of negatives and transparencies that need to be digitized. However,
they range from 35mm to 8X10", with a lot of 120 and some 2"x3" sheet film
as well. I'm going to try to set up like I used to for duplicating slides
Thanks for the good info. It is a project I need to do when I get a
round tuit.
Along with converting LP records, VHS tapes, etc. ...
After retirement, I planned to scan my many old negatives to digital. I
have several thousand frames from the 60s through the 90s that I wanted to
save.
26 matches
Mail list logo