Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-08 Thread OK Don
Exactly.
What the MAC doesn't have to deal with is a HUGE variety of hardware
and drivers. That's what makes a large part of the difference.

Using VPC, you've just eliminated the hardware issues. The VPC
presents the same virtual hardware to the OS, regardless of what's
underneath. That SHOULD make the OS about as stable as it can be,
given the stability of the host OS/hardware. Of course, I do blow up
the OS in VPCs, because that's what I'm testing -- what will happen
when I do this stupid thing or that  -- Recovery is just shut it down
with out saving the changes, back up in a virgin state in minutes.
Great stuff!

I had a graphics shop that was running on PCs, but they were
complaining about blowing up the PCs, not stable, etc. When they got
to printing color directly to the press, we OK'd the MACs - far better
color management.  Seems that those creative graphic artists can blow
up MACs just as fast as they did PCs - but no they have to support
themselves - we won't touch them.

On 4/7/06, Curt Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Say what? I can install Windows XP on ANYTHING in about 2 hours. OS 10.4 
 takes about the same...

   Windows 98 was garbage, Windows 95 was also garbage. 2000 and XP are quite 
 stable and usable. The problem is the garbage that people load onto them. 
 Like the type R stickers that make cars go faster...

   -Curt

   Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 21:53:41 -0700
 From: redghost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away
 To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

 It has more to do with hours wasted trying to keep the POS running.  If
 you have done installs of windows, you can see why a mac user will be
 very perplexed by a person willing to subject themselves to that
 torture.  Sort of the head scratch I have with Mistress Jill.  WTF gets
 into a boy to want to be hung up with tuna hooks on 100# test line?

 An OS install for mac takes a few moments and runs.  A winblows install
 can take all weekend to get it nailed down right.



 -
 Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates 
 starting at 1¢/min.
 ___
 http://www.striplin.net
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net



--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
'90 300D 243K, Rattled
'87 300SDL 290K, Limo Lite, or blue car
'81 240D 173K, Gramps, or yellow car
'78 450SLC 67K, brown car
'97 Ply Grand Voyager 78K Van Go



Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-08 Thread Peter Frederick
Living in both the Mac and PC world for some 20 years now, I still find 
the Mac much easier to keep functioning.  There are some limitations on 
hardware, but not on the upper end (any networkable printer is very 
likely to be Mac compatible, at least with a generic Postscript 
driver).  PCs, on the other hand, require HUGE effort to get compatible 
drivers, SCSI was always a big pain, and so forth.  Macs are somewhat 
more tempermental in some ways (i.e. no slave drive on revision 1 BW 
G3s) and memory isn't always standard, but I've always had fewer 
headaches with them.  A couple of driver packages has always taken care 
of the hardware (mostly hard drive) problems.  I did find one of the 
few drives completely unusable with my Wallstreet G3 laptop quite by 
chance, but all in all, I've spent much less time making my Macs work 
than my PCs/


Certainly, the OS is much less troublesome.  Up to OS X, installation 
and re-installation was a breeze.  OS X takes somewhat longer (as a 
friend of mine says, Linux/Unix is patch heaven), but is still less 
of a hassle than XP or any earlier version.  Managing extensions is 
very easy on the mac, unlike a PC pre-XP/2000, and memory management is 
a whole different ball of wax, although that issue is thankfully gone 
-- anyone else remember when 512k of memory was a lot?


As far as users screwing things up, what can they possibly be doing 
other than actual damage?  Using any standard software is pretty much 
transparent, and Macs no more sensitive to damage from inappropriate 
hot swapping things than PCs.


Peter




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-08 Thread Jim Cathey

-- anyone else remember when 512k of memory was a lot?


I remember when 5k was a lot!  My first computer had 256 bytes
of RAM.  (Still does, actually, in that I still have it.  But
I added 1k of RAM to it somewhere along the line.)

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-08 Thread Jeff Zedic
I remember going to the software store and thinking I was a hotshot 
because I had a 14MB harddrive!


This was after using the dual 5 1/4 floppy with no drive at work!


Jeff Zedic
Toronto
87 300TD



Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-08 Thread Trampas
I come from mainly a DOS-Windows world but work with Unix during school. So
at work we are doing some major number crunching (8-10Gbytes of data) so we
built a Win XP x64 box. It removed memory constraints but was not fast. So I
went to install Linux (red hat fedora core 4). Spent about a day trying to
install video drivers, never could get them compile correctly etc. Contacted
some Linux gurus they spent hours trying. Finally gave up. 

I have not tried OSX or Mac yet but have been considering it now that I can
boot XP on the hardware if needed. I love the idea of BSD (OSX), I like the
OSX user interface better than XP. The only two problems I have with OSX is
#1 learning a new OS
#2 Programs that only run on XP like CAD software

Linux is great if you spend you life learning the OS, but for some of us a
computer is a tool which increases the value of our time. Linux for me
decreases the value of my time as it takes me extra time for configuring and
using the OS. 

Trampas 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff Zedic
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 3:35 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

I remember going to the software store and thinking I was a hotshot 
because I had a 14MB harddrive!

This was after using the dual 5 1/4 floppy with no drive at work!


Jeff Zedic
Toronto
87 300TD

___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-08 Thread lee
On Saturday 08 April 2006 6:56, Trampas wrote:
 Linux is great if you spend you life learning the OS, but for some of us a
 computer is a tool which increases the value of our time. Linux for me
 decreases the value of my time as it takes me extra time for configuring
 and using the OS.


I have been using LInux for a decade or so.  I initially made the switch from 
Windoze based on the fact that I was spending several hours per month 
diagnosing problems,  restoring registries, etc after crashes and I figured 
that my time would be better spent learning a stable OS rather than 
bandaiding  a total POS like Windoze 98. 

I have used several Linux distros. I am not by any means a computer whiz, 
ubernerd, etc. 

There is a great deal of variation from distro to distro in terms of ease of 
installation and configuration. Installing and configuring Red Hat is not 
necessarily the best intro to Linux. Had you started with Mepis, Ubuntu, 
Kubuntu, etc, you may have had a more pleasant experience. 

Using Linux is no more difficult than using XP or OSX from a daily user's 
perspective.  The difference in daily use is that you are using a different 
windows manager and different applications, i.e., OpenOffice rather than M$ 
Office, the GIMP rather than Photoshop, Firefox or Konqueror rather than M$ 
Internet Explorer. These transitions are easy to make, IMO.  KDE in 
particular is very similar to Windows in layout. The big differences between 
Linux and other OSs become apparent when you are functioning more in an 
administration mode. In this mode, there will be a learning curve, but with 
Linux you will be learning a system which is really elegant in most respects. 

Initial configuration of a linux OS can occasionally present challenges, but 
it is a wee bit of pain, followed by countless hours of using an OS which 
costs nothing, doesn't crash and doesn't need anti-virus software. 

Lee



Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-08 Thread David Brodbeck
lee wrote:
 Initial configuration of a linux OS can occasionally present challenges, but 
 it is a wee bit of pain, followed by countless hours of using an OS which 
 costs nothing, doesn't crash and doesn't need anti-virus software. 

On typical 32-bit machines, that's true.  In fact, the hardware
detection in the recent distributions I've used has been pretty much
flawless.  It was actually a little easier than Windows because I didn't
have to hunt down drivers.

However, Trampas is talking about a 64-bit machine.  Everything I've
heard indicates that Linux on 64-bit desktop systems isn't quite ready
for prime time.  The initial push was to get 64-bit working well on
servers, and that means that a lot of the driver support and such isn't
quite there for desktop systems.

Microsoft went through a similar period with 64-bit Windows XP.
However, they can demand that hardware manufacturers write new drivers
for them.  Linux distributions don't have that kind of pull.



Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-07 Thread redghost
It has more to do with hours wasted trying to keep the POS running.  If 
you have done installs of windows, you can see why a mac user will be 
very perplexed by a person willing to subject themselves to that 
torture.  Sort of the head scratch I have with Mistress Jill.  WTF gets 
into a boy to want to be hung up with tuna hooks on 100# test line?


An OS install for mac takes a few moments and runs.  A winblows install 
can take all weekend to get it nailed down right.


On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, at 11:22 PM, Zoltan Finks wrote:

When I heard the news on the radio today, I knew lots of people would 
get

all worked up.

Mac vs. PC reminds me of the Mopar vs. Chevy war that raged in my 
circles

growing up.

As a graphic artist, I have used lots of Macs, but some years ago it 
seems
PCs became capable enough to do everything I need to do. So I don't 
feel

much loyalty either way. To me, a computer is a tool - I have never
understood the passion.

Well, actually, I may begin to understand when I think of the war in 
terms
of cars. I would throw down in defense of Mopars as a kid. I hated 
Chevys.
And Fords did not often even enter the conversation. Guess everyone 
needs

something to root for. Look at avid sports fans, heck, even young gang
members. We need something that allows us to say, Hey, this is mine, 
this

is who I am, you got a problem with that?

Brian
Feeling philosophical tonight

On 4/6/06, redghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Used to run VPC on a 9500/200 and it was about as fast as having a
P5/133.  Had it hopped up with ram.  No OS X version, so no idea if it
runs well on the iMac and what speed.  The 6400/G3 400 made it seem
about as fast as a 266 PII under OS 8.6 and 384 ram

On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, at 08:21 PM, Jim Cathey wrote:

He needs to run winders for FEMA, but prefers to work efficiently 
the

rest
of the time.  I have been drooling over the macbooks for some time
now.


And why not run VPC (or equivalent) instead?  No dual-booting 
involved,

and the PC junk is never in control enough to be able to hammer the
system, only itself.  Plenty fast enough for a whole lot of uses.

-- Jim


___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner

1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz


___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net


___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner

1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-07 Thread Jim Cathey

An OS install for mac takes a few moments and runs.  A winblows install
can take all weekend to get it nailed down right.


With VPC it's just dupe the master already-installed template file
and you're done.  Moments, indeed.

-- Jim




[MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread redghost

http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/

WTF!  If I wanted that garbage on my computer I would have gotten a dell

--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner

1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread Jim Cathey

http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
WTF!  If I wanted that garbage on my computer I would have gotten a 
dell


A friend of mine tells me that if you want the very fastest notebook
PC you need to get an Intel Macbook and coerce it into doing Windows
or Linux (whatever).  Myself, I think OS X is just fine!

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread Loren Faeth

I told JohnnyB that yesterday.  You guys weren't paying attention:

You might consider purchasing what is currently the world's fastest Windows
laptop, a Macbook.  Yep! Macbook!
http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/06/03/23/1717259.shtml
There is a patch out that allows you to have a dual boot Macbook; OSX for
efficiency, or Windows when you must.  Seems like a good solution to
me.  And you also get a very nice laptop in the deal.

He needs to run winders for FEMA, but prefers to work efficiently the rest 
of the time.  I have been drooling over the macbooks for some time now.


At 07:55 PM 4/5/2006, you wrote:

 http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
 WTF!  If I wanted that garbage on my computer I would have gotten a
 dell

A friend of mine tells me that if you want the very fastest notebook
PC you need to get an Intel Macbook and coerce it into doing Windows
or Linux (whatever).  Myself, I think OS X is just fine!

-- Jim


___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread George Gregory
On 4/5/06 7:55 PM, Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A friend of mine tells me that if you want the very fastest notebook
 PC you need to get an Intel Macbook and coerce it into doing Windows
 or Linux (whatever).  Myself, I think OS X is just fine!
 
 -- Jim

This is true.
And Apple this a disclaimer on its site:

Word to the Wise

Windows running on a Mac is like Windows running on a PC. That means it¹ll
be subject to the same attacks that plague the Windows world. So be sure to
keep it updated with the latest Microsoft Windows security fixes.

-- 
+-- 
GG
1997 SL500 (101k)
http://homepage.mac.com/deneals/SL500.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/deneals
+--





Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread John M McIntosh


On 5-Apr-06, at 7:25 PM, George Gregory wrote:


This is true.
And Apple this a disclaimer on its site:

Word to the Wise

Windows running on a Mac is like Windows running on a PC. That  
means it’ll
be subject to the same attacks that plague the Windows world. So be  
sure to

keep it updated with the latest Microsoft Windows security fixes.



That's for ignorant macintosh users who've never been exposed to the  
Window's trauma of

viruses and pop-up ads extraordinary.

I will also note consumer reports rates apple #1 by a huge percentage  
over #2 for hardware
quality  support. So buying a nice mac and *only* running XP or  
Vista someday on it wouldn't be
a stupid decision just in order to get nice looking and superb  
performing hardware.


Still I have to wonder if you buy a XP CD who does the support for  
you? Usually isn't that covered by

the poor hardware vendor?

PS I keep getting whacked by the fact that consumer reports also says  
mercedes ranked mucho last
in problems with their cars. Although I point out that a friend  
bought a used 2002 C320? wagon which
he still feels after two months of usage the finest automobile he has  
driven even compared to every 2006/2007

wagon/crossover vehicle he could get his hands on.

John
1983 300TDt  372k Kilometers (mobil 1 Delvac)
1990 300TDt  164k Kilometers (mobil 1 Delvac)
1993 500SEL 172k Kilometers (mobil 1 0w40)





Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread Jim Cathey
He needs to run winders for FEMA, but prefers to work efficiently the 
rest

of the time.  I have been drooling over the macbooks for some time now.


And why not run VPC (or equivalent) instead?  No dual-booting involved,
and the PC junk is never in control enough to be able to hammer the
system, only itself.  Plenty fast enough for a whole lot of uses.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread redghost

Those fixes are the cause of more trouble with that darn PC

On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, at 07:25 PM, George Gregory wrote:


On 4/5/06 7:55 PM, Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


A friend of mine tells me that if you want the very fastest notebook
PC you need to get an Intel Macbook and coerce it into doing Windows
or Linux (whatever).  Myself, I think OS X is just fine!

-- Jim


This is true.
And Apple this a disclaimer on its site:

Word to the Wise

Windows running on a Mac is like Windows running on a PC. That means 
it’ll
be subject to the same attacks that plague the Windows world. So be 
sure to

keep it updated with the latest Microsoft Windows security fixes.

--
+--
GG
1997 SL500 (101k)
http://homepage.mac.com/deneals/SL500.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/deneals
+--



___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner

1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread redghost
Last CR I looked at did not list a Benz as a best buy, but had a large 
number in the car to avoid


On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, at 07:45 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:



On 5-Apr-06, at 7:25 PM, George Gregory wrote:


This is true.
And Apple this a disclaimer on its site:

Word to the Wise

Windows running on a Mac is like Windows running on a PC. That
means it’ll
be subject to the same attacks that plague the Windows world. So be
sure to
keep it updated with the latest Microsoft Windows security fixes.



That's for ignorant macintosh users who've never been exposed to the
Window's trauma of
viruses and pop-up ads extraordinary.

I will also note consumer reports rates apple #1 by a huge percentage
over #2 for hardware
quality  support. So buying a nice mac and *only* running XP or
Vista someday on it wouldn't be
a stupid decision just in order to get nice looking and superb
performing hardware.

Still I have to wonder if you buy a XP CD who does the support for
you? Usually isn't that covered by
the poor hardware vendor?

PS I keep getting whacked by the fact that consumer reports also says
mercedes ranked mucho last
in problems with their cars. Although I point out that a friend
bought a used 2002 C320? wagon which
he still feels after two months of usage the finest automobile he has
driven even compared to every 2006/2007
wagon/crossover vehicle he could get his hands on.

John
1983 300TDt  372k Kilometers (mobil 1 Delvac)
1990 300TDt  164k Kilometers (mobil 1 Delvac)
1993 500SEL 172k Kilometers (mobil 1 0w40)



___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner

1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread redghost
Used to run VPC on a 9500/200 and it was about as fast as having a 
P5/133.  Had it hopped up with ram.  No OS X version, so no idea if it 
runs well on the iMac and what speed.  The 6400/G3 400 made it seem 
about as fast as a 266 PII under OS 8.6 and 384 ram


On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, at 08:21 PM, Jim Cathey wrote:


He needs to run winders for FEMA, but prefers to work efficiently the
rest
of the time.  I have been drooling over the macbooks for some time 
now.


And why not run VPC (or equivalent) instead?  No dual-booting involved,
and the PC junk is never in control enough to be able to hammer the
system, only itself.  Plenty fast enough for a whole lot of uses.

-- Jim


___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner

1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread Zoltan Finks
When I heard the news on the radio today, I knew lots of people would get
all worked up.

Mac vs. PC reminds me of the Mopar vs. Chevy war that raged in my circles
growing up.

As a graphic artist, I have used lots of Macs, but some years ago it seems
PCs became capable enough to do everything I need to do. So I don't feel
much loyalty either way. To me, a computer is a tool - I have never
understood the passion.

Well, actually, I may begin to understand when I think of the war in terms
of cars. I would throw down in defense of Mopars as a kid. I hated Chevys.
And Fords did not often even enter the conversation. Guess everyone needs
something to root for. Look at avid sports fans, heck, even young gang
members. We need something that allows us to say, Hey, this is mine, this
is who I am, you got a problem with that?

Brian
Feeling philosophical tonight

On 4/6/06, redghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Used to run VPC on a 9500/200 and it was about as fast as having a
 P5/133.  Had it hopped up with ram.  No OS X version, so no idea if it
 runs well on the iMac and what speed.  The 6400/G3 400 made it seem
 about as fast as a 266 PII under OS 8.6 and 384 ram

 On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, at 08:21 PM, Jim Cathey wrote:

  He needs to run winders for FEMA, but prefers to work efficiently the
  rest
  of the time.  I have been drooling over the macbooks for some time
  now.
 
  And why not run VPC (or equivalent) instead?  No dual-booting involved,
  and the PC junk is never in control enough to be able to hammer the
  system, only itself.  Plenty fast enough for a whole lot of uses.
 
  -- Jim
 
 
  ___
  http://www.striplin.net
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net
 
 


 --
 Clay
 Seattle Bioburner

 1972 220D - Gump
 1995 E300D - Cleo
 1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
 The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz


 ___
 http://www.striplin.net
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net



Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread David Brodbeck

John M McIntosh wrote:
Still I have to wonder if you buy a XP CD who does the support for  
you? Usually isn't that covered by

the poor hardware vendor?
  


If you buy a retail boxed copy, you get support directly from 
Microsoft.  That's one of the reasons you pay a premium to get it that way.


If you buy the OEM edition, a little flat package with a peel-off 
sticker to put on the case, YOU have just become the hardware vendor and 
you're on your own.



David Brodbeck
'83 300D Turbo




Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread lee
On Thursday 06 April 2006 12:12, David Brodbeck wrote:
 If you buy a retail boxed copy, you get support directly from
 Microsoft.  That's one of the reasons you pay a premium to get it that way.


Been there. Called M$ years ago  when I was having problems with a 
Windows-powered pc and verified experientially what I had long suspected - 
the only advantage the guy on the other end of the line had over me was that 
he had a M$ troubleshooting manual. 

Putting XP on your Mac is like putting cheap mags and a spoiler on your Benz. 


Lee



Re: [MBZ] We can all just throw our Macs away

2006-04-06 Thread David Brodbeck

lee wrote:
Putting XP on your Mac is like putting cheap mags and a spoiler on your Benz. 
  


Well, yes and no.  It's more like having a gasoline Benz instead of a 
diesel one.  It's not as efficient and there's more maintenace required, 
but you have a lot more options when you need to buy fuel.



David Brodbeck
'83 300D Turbo