Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
.
- Original Message -
From: "John Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
> Zoltan Finks wr
usually because of the heat from office equipment/lights etc the issue
is keeping the heat
down.
I once worked as a consultant in a Sprint owned 20 story building,
during the weekend coding
madness the temp would climb to 90F+ We finally said this is crazy
how much does it cost
to run the
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Chuck Landenberger
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:10 PM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
>
> Bill,
>
> Just wondering... How much were you earning in the mid 70's?
>
&g
lf Of Chuck Landenberger
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:10 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
Bill,
Just wondering... How much were you earning in the mid 70's?
Take care,
Chuck
On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:59 PM, Bill R wrote:
> So we have $
Luther wrote:
> At my 29 years, I've seen gas as low as $0.69 during the mid to late 90s.
I miss 1998. It was a good time to not have any money but still drive a
450SEL, as premium was never over a dollar for the year or so that I
owned it.
Tom
___
http://w
Insert banned type comment here.
Gas hasn't been under $1 in New England since I got out of high school in '94.
-Curt
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:01:55 -0600
From: "Kaleb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
To: Mercedes D
Well yea, the enterprise has to leave its warp engines running all the
time, because it takes a long time to fire them up. Why Im sure you all
remember the problem Scotty had when he needed to start them up quick.
Good thing Al Gore was not in charge.
E M wrote:
> I think a similar formula app
Well hell, for that matter, just weeks after 911, it stayed down around
79 a gallon here for a while, then stabilized at between 89 and 99 for
months.
Luther wrote:
> At my 29 years, I've seen gas as low as $0.69 during the mid to late 90s.
>
> Luther
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:29:19 -0600, Do
Oh yea, as to showers, I take one every month weather I need it or not :)
Jeff Zedic wrote:
>>
>>
>> And another thing: I don't think people should take more than one shower a
>> day. Heck I don't even take one a day. Isn't it shocking? I am willing to
>> deal with the increase in body odor I'd ha
I keep ours 68 during the day in the winter, 62 at night and when nobody
is home, program thermostat. In the summer, used to keep it 78 when
people home, but I think I dropped it to 76. 82 during the day when
nobody here. At night have it set to drop to something like 72. Heard
somewhere its
Yea, I just love the rolling roadblock. You get one truck trying to
pass another truck for like 10 miles uphill. Geez dude, give up and get
back over so the 20 cars behind you can move on.
Zoltan Finks wrote:
> Well, I'm sure you're probably correct about this.
>
> On the other hand, I am alm
vered 17 acres. Maintenence discovered that
> it was cheaper to leave the lights on 24/7 and to go through & change
> out all of the bulbs & ballasts every 3 years.
>
> Tom
> www.kegkits.com
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: E M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> R
enance man to replace them as they burn out. I worked for GTE many
> > years ago and our building covered 17 acres. Maintenence discovered that
> > it was cheaper to leave the lights on 24/7 and to go through & change
> > out all of the bulbs & ballasts every 3 years.
> >
>
ars.
>
> Tom
> www.kegkits.com
>
> - Original Message -
> From: E M
> Received: 2/22/08 2:00 PM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> CC:
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
>
> At night, I have a clear view from the back of my hous
d: 2/22/08 2:00 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
CC:
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
At night, I have a clear view from the back of my house of 4 gov
buildings,
all with every single light turned on, 24 hours a day. Bet they keep it
nice and toasty too.
Ed
300E
On 22/02/
At night, I have a clear view from the back of my house of 4 gov buildings,
all with every single light turned on, 24 hours a day. Bet they keep it
nice and toasty too.
Ed
300E
On 22/02/2008, Jeff Zedic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > And another thing: I don't think people should t
I'm not quite ready to live like that. While I'll turn a light off if I
leave a room, I think ppl are taking this whole global warming/cooling thing
a little far. I keep the house at 69, shower three times a day, and use
premium gas in all my cars, and I'm not yet convinced doing any of the above
Luther wrote:
> At my 29 years, I've seen gas as low as $0.69 during the mid to late 90s.
My lowest was about $1 a gallon when I was in high school. Was probably
around 2000-2001.
John
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: htt
I agree 100 percent.
Thanks, Tom
256-656-1924
-Original Message-
From: "Donald Snook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: 2/21/08 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
Zedic wrote:
"Do you doubt that there's
At my 29 years, I've seen gas as low as $0.69 during the mid to late 90s.
Luther
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:29:19 -0600, Donald Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan wrote: "Lowest price I clearly remember as a kid was $0.79/gal for
> regular. As recently as the mid 1990s I could buy gas for $0.9
Zoltan Finks wrote:
> Without delving too deeply, I can just say that I'm surprised how warm most
> people keep their homes and businesses. For cat's sake, turn down the
> thermostat and put on a sweater! I am so stiflingly hot and uncomfortable in
> many peoples' homes. We keep ours at 62 when I'm
>
>
>
> And another thing: I don't think people should take more than one shower a
> day. Heck I don't even take one a day. Isn't it shocking? I am willing to
> deal with the increase in body odor I'd have to endure from the general
> public. Heck, I'd rather smell that than bad breath, and It seem
What always amuses me about JIT inventory is that it applies strictly
to putting parts together. Doesn't take long in American
manufacturing for the management to want JIT MANUFACTURING of parts,
jigs, fixtures, etc.
There is an enormous difference between the arrival of pre-
manufactured
Without delving too deeply, I can just say that I'm surprised how warm most
people keep their homes and businesses. For cat's sake, turn down the
thermostat and put on a sweater! I am so stiflingly hot and uncomfortable in
many peoples' homes. We keep ours at 62 when I'm home alone and 64 when the
Well, I'm sure you're probably correct about this.
On the other hand, I am almost constantly disappointed in the lack of
professionalism displayed by the drivers of big rigs (and city and school
buses for that matter). It often seems to be a matter of bullying. Yes,
truckers have to stand up for t
Let's remember as well that the JIT inventory idea came from a MUCH smaller
country. I imagine it was easier to arrange shipping when the farthest
distance between supplier and factory could only be 300 miles or so...(just
guessing..I've no idea how big Japan is)
Zedic
>
>
___
Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And why the big push for JIT versus inventory? In part, because
> they're taxed on inventory! Your government tax dollars at work!
That is no doubt part of it, but also businesses woke up to the
opportunity cost of having a lot of capital tied up in larg
eek for fuel, though if you counted repair and maintenance costs
> that didn't matter as much as it should have.
> BillR
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Sent: 2/21/08 12:19 AM
>
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: 2/21/08 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
I remember my sister paying a dollar for five gallons of gas during the
1930s. This was for the first car in the family; a 1928 Oakland which had
wooden spoke wh
Thankyou.
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Donald Snook
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:33 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
Randy wisely wrote:
"He talks the talk but he doe
Actually, I wasn't asking about Gore...to me he's unimportant. I was more
concerned with what your thoughts are about the phenomenon.
Zedic
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAI
Zedic wrote:
"Do you doubt that there's any truth to this horseshit?"
That is the magic of Al Gore and his movement. He weaves the tiniest little
slice of truth into all of the other crap, and then acts self righteous when
his critics point out that a lot of what he has alleged is a) not true o
Time and money.
Considering that the goods have to be shifted from factory to rail head
and then at the other end from rail head to final destination. Easier
and more likely cheaper to just have a truck take the goods from A to B.
There are systems in place where the whole trailer is put onto rai
I fail to see how further taxing is going to do anything but line the
governments pockets
R A Bennell wrote:
> I don't know how much coverage you folks get of Canadian news (none? - USA is
> a bit introverted in many ways) but
> British Columbia provincial government just introduced a carbon tax
Randy wisely wrote:
"He talks the talk but he does not appear to be living the green life. I
consider Gore to be an opportunist trying to take advantage of the hype that he
is stirring up. I think we do have issues that need to be addressed but taxing
the you know what out of us is hardly the a
Phillip wrote: "A truck can get a load from one coast to the other in 5-8 days.
Every time, any destination.
The railroad takes longer, and if it's not a major market at each end it is
even longer."
I agree with that, except it is a lot safer to have that cargo on the trains -
at least safer f
So far what has amazed me about the alernatives is how many of these
> companies seem to see no way to make money with new technologies??
Any alternative will "hurt the economy" Nonsense, what simpleton horseshit
that is!
Zedic
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For
Donald,
Do you doubt that there's any truth to this horseshit?
Zedic
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://
Andrew S. wrote:
"Randy, you have to rethink your views on Al Gore. I suggest you view
"Inconvenient Truth" if you haven't already done so. If you have, then there
is no real hope for a rapid conversion."
Well, I did view it and it was exactly what I expected - horseshit!
Donald H. Snook
ht
Jeff Zedic wrote:
> The one thing that will make people modify their behaviour is to increase
> the cost of doing it! They simply refuse to do it otherwise...guess we
> haven't evolved all that much
You can also make the alternative cheaper.
John
___
http
>
> I think we do have issues that need to be addressed but taxing the you
> know what out of us is hardly the answer.
>
> Randy
>
> Well here's your chance to change your wasteful lifestyle and be the first
on your block! Convince your family and friends to modify their lifestyles
too! Go ahead! I
> I agree, it has always puzzled me why there's so many big
> bloody trucks about when it's much more efficient to ship via
> rail!
> Zedic
Time.
A truck can get a load from one coast to the other in 5-8 days.
Every time, any destination.
The railroad takes longer, and if it's not a major mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andrew strasfogel
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:25 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
Randy, you have to rethink your views on Al Gore. I suggest you view
Right! It was $.139/gallon.
Talk nice about those chicks, they're somone's Grandma now!
Pete
-- Original message --
From: "Alex Chamberlain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Fmiser wrote:
> > > I paid $.0139 during the "Gas Wars" in Connecticut
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Fmiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I paid $.0139 during the "Gas Wars" in Connecticut, about 1959
> > or so. They pumped it too!
> >
> > Some stations had young ladies in bathing suits pumping gas
> > and handing out glasses and such.
> >
> > Pete
>
>
>
It seems than at Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:38:57 -0800, Zoltan wrote:
> I don't know how much crude was at the time. Didn't follow
> that back then, and I only know nowadays because it's all over
> the news due to its all-time high price.
> Interesting about the tax added to diesel. So without it,
> die
> I paid $.0139 during the "Gas Wars" in Connecticut, about 1959
> or so. They pumped it too!
>
> Some stations had young ladies in bathing suits pumping gas
> and handing out glasses and such.
>
> Pete
1.4 cents per gallon ?!
I think you misplaced the decimal. *smile*
-- Phi
It seems than at Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:43:50 +1030, Hendrik wrote:
> Aren't drivers of large vehicles paying more fuel tax/mile?
>
> Hendrik
Yes. Most states only have part of the "road tax" for cargo
transport added to the fuel.
--Philip
___
http:
ys to tax me to reinforce Al Gore's message, but
>> then, governments of all stripes do love to
>> tax us.
>>
>> Randy
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andrew strasfogel
>> Sen
t
> then, governments of all stripes do love to
> tax us.
>
> Randy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andrew strasfogel
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:04 PM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Su
>> Actually, I'd love it if there could be a separate highway system for
>> freight trucks.
>
> They've got it. It's called the railroad. It really p***es me
> off that it's been largely let go to seed. With that working
> correctly, and smaller last-mile delivery trucks, we'd have a
> very effi
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:45 AM, John Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The railroads actually seem to be making a comeback.
True, and there's no better proof of the fact than that Warren
Buffett's been loading up on Burlington Northern stock. Man knows an
infrastructure trend when he sees on
I agree with you Ed. I really enjoy the trains...especially now that I live
in a country where the actually HAVE trains to use. In October we went to
Paris on the TGV. Talk about smooth! Like a baby's bum at 320 km/hr! Even
changed tracks at that speed!
Apparently the French have a prototype rail
> In today's market where
> people spend millions of dollars to minimize their inventory on hand,
> when they need to meet demand they need it to be met quickly. Rail is
> finally starting to work on that! :)
And why the big push for JIT versus inventory? In part, because
they're taxed on invent
I remember taking the train as a kid and young teen many times, over driving
or flying. I find flying now, on those 4-5 hour flights are just a pain and
wast of time. You spend more time in customs at either end, than you do in
the air. There was a real romance about boarding a train. I often to
Jeff Zedic wrote:
> I agree, it has always puzzled me why there's so many big bloody trucks
> about when it's much more efficient to ship via rail!
>
> Someone on this list responded a couple of years ago when I ranted about
> this, that the problem was the railways following the current business
i boughtmy first diesel about a decade ago. fuel was 70 cents a gallon at
the truck stop on I85 in doraville, GA.
fuel prices are going to wreck us
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Rory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sounds pretty good, diesel has been 3.69 to 3.89 all winter here in WA
>
> On F
I agree, it has always puzzled me why there's so many big bloody trucks
about when it's much more efficient to ship via rail!
Someone on this list responded a couple of years ago when I ranted about
this, that the problem was the railways following the current business
idealcorner the market a
Jim Cathey wrote:
> They've got it. It's called the railroad. It really p***es me
> off that it's been largely let go to seed. With that working
> correctly, and smaller last-mile delivery trucks, we'd have a
> very efficient (in terms of fuel) system that would be a lot
> easier on roads. And
> Actually, I'd love it if there could be a separate highway system for
> freight trucks.
They've got it. It's called the railroad. It really p***es me
off that it's been largely let go to seed. With that working
correctly, and smaller last-mile delivery trucks, we'd have a
very efficient (in t
Alan wrote: "Lowest price I clearly remember as a kid was $0.79/gal for
regular. As recently as the mid 1990s I could buy gas for $0.97 - $0.99 near
Joliet IL there were two stations there that were always in a price war it
seemed."
When I first started driving, gas was $.74/gal. I drive a 1978
MAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Bill R
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
>
> Fred, if $.38 is the lowest you remember you are still a kid on this list.
&
Aren't drivers of large vehicles paying more fuel tax/mile?
Be careful what you wish for or you might find yourself driving a A
class and paying three times as much for fuel to fund the separate
highway system for heavy vehicles.
Hendrik
Zoltan Finks wrote:
> I don't know how much crude was at
by truckers.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom Hargrave
> www.kegkits.com
> 256-656-1924
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Zoltan Finks
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:00 PM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> The "filling station" across the street had gravity flow pumps. The
> attendant would hand pump the amount of gas you wanted into a glass
> cylinder
> at the top of the pump which was marked off in gallons, and then it
> would
> drain by gravity through the hose and into your tank.
The gradua
My latest acquisition is now running on 5 cylinders.
5 outta 5 ain't bad! At least it wasn't a head gasket as you had originally
thought.
Kevin in Hillsboro, OR
1983 300SD 267Kmi+, Ursula
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor:
Lowest price I clearly remember as a kid was $0.79/gal for regular.
As recently as the mid 1990s I could buy gas for $0.97 - $0.99 near
Joliet IL there were two stations there that were always in a price
war it seemed.
Allan
--
1983 300D
___
http://www.okiebe
, and had
> to be 1966.
> BillR
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Frederick W Moir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Sent: 2/20/08 7:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
>
> At 07:00 PM 2/20/2008, you
2008 6:36 PM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
>
> Fred, if $.38 is the lowest you remember you are still a kid on this list.
> I remember paying $.23 on a car I was driving. Ocala, FL, and had to be
> 1966.
> BillR
>
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:00:24 -0800 "Zoltan Finks"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, 3.79 here for the frothy stuff.
> I still think overall the government or some evil entity in power is
> trying to counteract the benefits diesel drivers get in fuel mileage.
> With what looks like diesel popularit
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:36:29 -0700 Craig McCluskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:12:02 -0600 Donald Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Gas and diesel shot up this morning here in Wichita. I would guess it
> > did the same thing everywhere. Regular unleaded 3.09 premium
Of Bill R
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:36 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
Fred, if $.38 is the lowest you remember you are still a kid on this list.
I remember paying $.23 on a car I was driving. Ocala, FL, and had to be
1966.
BillR
-O
t: 2/20/08 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
At 07:00 PM 2/20/2008, you wrote:
>Yes, 3.79 here for the frothy stuff.
>I still think overall the government or some evil entity in power is trying
>to counteract the benefits diesel drivers get in fuel mileage. With
24
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zoltan Finks
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:00 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
Yes, 3.79 here for the frothy stuff.
I still think overall the government o
"Zoltan Finks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, 3.79 here for the frothy stuff. I still think overall the
> government or some evil entity in power is trying to counteract the
> benefits diesel drivers get in fuel mileage. With what looks like
> diesel popularity increasing faster than ever (ta
At 07:00 PM 2/20/2008, you wrote:
>Yes, 3.79 here for the frothy stuff.
>I still think overall the government or some evil entity in power is trying
>to counteract the benefits diesel drivers get in fuel mileage. With what
>looks like diesel popularity increasing faster than ever (talk of Subaru
>d
Yes, 3.79 here for the frothy stuff.
I still think overall the government or some evil entity in power is trying
to counteract the benefits diesel drivers get in fuel mileage. With what
looks like diesel popularity increasing faster than ever (talk of Subaru
diesels and Honda diesels and the like)
Regular unleaded 3.09 premium 3.29 and diesel is 3.39.
That's only a few cents above what it's been here in Oregon for months now.
I think we have some of the highest fuel prices in the continental U.S.
Kevin in Hillsboro, OR
1983 300sD 267Kmi+, Ursula, 28-30MPG Hwy at 65MPH, and a bit less at 7
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andrew strasfogel
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
HA! At least one thing is cheaper in D.C. ($3.49/gal for diesel at last
sighting)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Timothy R
ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:10:51 -0500
> > To: Mercedes Discussion List
> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price of fuel
> >
> >
> >
> > Jim Cathey wrote:
> >>
> >
Just noticed today, $3.599 for diesel. Last I filled a few weeks ago was
$3.349.
> From: Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:10:51 -0500
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Whoa look at the price o
Well, that is because that refinery blew up, and oil is over 100 a
barrel again.
Donald Snook wrote:
> Gas and diesel shot up this morning here in Wichita. I would guess it did the
> same thing everywhere. Regular unleaded 3.09 premium 3.29 and diesel is 3.39.
> I am thinking next time, I have
Jim Cathey wrote:
>
> Refinery fire the other day in Texas (?). Talking head said
> that it was actually a pretty small refinery, but that the market
> would probably react disproportionately. I'm sure gas prices
> shot up in speculation, not due to any actual shortage in supply.
What I like
sounds pretty good, diesel has been 3.69 to 3.89 all winter here in WA
On Feb 20, 2008 7:21 AM, Jim Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gas and diesel shot up this morning here in Wichita.
>
> Refinery fire the other day in Texas (?). Talking head said
> that it was actually a pretty small refi
> Gas and diesel shot up this morning here in Wichita.
Refinery fire the other day in Texas (?). Talking head said
that it was actually a pretty small refinery, but that the market
would probably react disproportionately. I'm sure gas prices
shot up in speculation, not due to any actual shortage
light crude hit $100 yesterday, up $4.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/m
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:12:02 -0600 Donald Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gas and diesel shot up this morning here in Wichita. I would guess it
> did the same thing everywhere. Regular unleaded 3.09 premium 3.29 and
> diesel is 3.39.
Ours went up a few days ago. 3.039 for regular and 3.529 fo
Gas and diesel shot up this morning here in Wichita. I would guess it did the
same thing everywhere. Regular unleaded 3.09 premium 3.29 and diesel is 3.39.
I am thinking next time, I have to take a long trip for work, I am going to
rent a car. 17 on the highway in my Expedition hurts
Donald H
88 matches
Mail list logo
