Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-27 Thread Fmiser
rumor has it that Robert wrote:

 That makes sense to me, but when I asked about this soon after I had
 purchased the car several years ago I was told that the dealer who had
 sold it (and who was no longer in business here at that time) had used
 the system of selling the car titled according to the date of sale rather
 than otherwise, regardless of how long it had been in his inventory. This
 seems strange to me that he could have legally done this but  I was
 also told that if the car was indeed a '76, the glow plug switch would
 have been incorporated into the key ignition switch as it was in later
 years instead of on a seperate pull-switch, as it is in mine. Also I was
 told that the oil filter could be accessed from under the hood in '76,
 while I still need to be under the car to change the filter in mine. The
 date of manufacture is stamped as 9/75, so I guess it could logically go
 either way as necessary, and this car must have been built near the time
 they made those changes. Anybody have some more comments about this I
 would like to hear them.
 Mick

Sound to me like the difference between a W115 and and W123. 240D was a
model available on both chassis. And the years overlapped. *grin* Makes
for a whole lot of fun for _us_ to figure out!!

My book says that in 1976 the production of 240D was nearly 16,000 W115
and 21,000 W123.

  Philip, who's never owned a W115



Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-27 Thread Jim Cathey

Philip, who's never owned a W115


You're missing out!  For whatever reason, I really like driving
our 114 and 115 cars.  But I really like to change horses once
in awhile too.  That's really why we have such a large stable
of cars.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-27 Thread OK Don
I agree - I think they drive better than the 123 does. The 107
suspension/running gear is based on the 114/115 chassis - and it
drives great. However, I like working on a 123 far better than a 115
-- --

On 12/26/05, Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Philip, who's never owned a W115

 You're missing out!  For whatever reason, I really like driving
 our 114 and 115 cars.  But I really like to change horses once
 in awhile too.  That's really why we have such a large stable
 of cars.

 -- Jim

--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
'90 300D, '87 300SDL,  '81 240D,  '78 450SLC
The FSM created the Diesel Benz
http://www.venganza.org/



Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-26 Thread Robert M Doran
That makes sense to me, but when I asked about this soon after I had
purchased the car several years ago I was told that the dealer who had
sold it (and who was no longer in business here at that time) had used
the system of selling the car titled according to the date of sale rather
than otherwise, regardless of how long it had been in his inventory. This
seems strange to me that he could have legally done this but  I was
also told that if the car was indeed a '76, the glow plug switch would
have been incorporated into the key ignition switch as it was in later
years instead of on a seperate pull-switch, as it is in mine. Also I was
told that the oil filter could be accessed from under the hood in '76,
while I still need to be under the car to change the filter in mine. The
date of manufacture is stamped as 9/75, so I guess it could logically go
either way as necessary, and this car must have been built near the time
they made those changes. Anybody have some more comments about this I
would like to hear them.
Mick

On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:05:21 -0800 Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Also, from your list of MBz you own,
  can you give me some evidences to differentiate a '75 vs a '76 
 240D. I
  have one titled as a '76, although for some reasons, I believe it 
 to 
  be a
  '75.  Thanks.
 
 Frankenheap is in the same boat.  The State thinks it is a '71, but 
 I
 have good reason to believe that '72 is more appropriate, given 
 that
 I found lots of '72 date codes on electrical items in it.
 
 I don't think that I'd want to try to convince the State that
 they had the wrong number!  What's in it for them to change,
 anyway?
 
 DBAG is not like some other manufacturers that have discontinuities
 in their design and production for each year, saving up most 
 engineering
 changes for the next model.  DBAG just made continuous improvements 
 as
 they thought of them, phasing them in at any old time.  The model 
 year
 designation (a US invention) is just another thing they stamp on
 arbitrarily to suit their production method.  After all, even for
 a Chevy the 'year' is just a 'designed for sale as the year of' 
 number,
 and is something like six months out of phase with the calendar 
 now.
 
 DBAG's VIN will tell you everything you need to order parts 
 appropriate
 for the car and probably the date of final assembly too, if you 
 care
 about that.  How that relates to the US's approximately 
 August-to-August
 'car year' is up to you.  Your State obviously took an assembled in
 '75 car and called it a '76.  My '97 pickup was originally sold in
 '96, sounds like the same thing.
 
 -- Jim
 
 
 ___
 http://www.striplin.net
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net
 
 



Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-26 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
All 115 240D (1976 was the last year) had the pull start glow knob and 
the top mounted oil filter.  In 1977 with the 123 240D they went to the 
key start.


Robert M Doran wrote:


That makes sense to me, but when I asked about this soon after I had
purchased the car several years ago I was told that the dealer who had
sold it (and who was no longer in business here at that time) had used
the system of selling the car titled according to the date of sale rather
than otherwise, regardless of how long it had been in his inventory. This
seems strange to me that he could have legally done this but  I was
also told that if the car was indeed a '76, the glow plug switch would
have been incorporated into the key ignition switch as it was in later
years instead of on a seperate pull-switch, as it is in mine. Also I was
told that the oil filter could be accessed from under the hood in '76,
while I still need to be under the car to change the filter in mine. The
date of manufacture is stamped as 9/75, so I guess it could logically go
either way as necessary, and this car must have been built near the time
they made those changes. Anybody have some more comments about this I
would like to hear them.
Mick


--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 89 560SEL, 87 300SDL, 85 380SE, 85 300D,
 84 250 LWB, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D, 81 240D,
 76 450SEL, 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net



Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-26 Thread Jim Cathey
the system of selling the car titled according to the date of sale 
rather
than otherwise, regardless of how long it had been in his inventory. 
This

seems strange to me that he could have legally done this but


In one way this even makes the most sense given the primary purpose
of the 'year' so far as the State is concerned: assessing value for
the purposes of taxation.  It minimizes the age and thus maximizes
the taxes.  So no, I'm not surprised that it is legal!

Follow the money.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-26 Thread OK Don
OK. My '76 300D 617 had the bottom mounted oil filter and a key
operated glow/starting system. My '70 220D 615 had the pull start
system.

On 12/26/05, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 All 115 240D (1976 was the last year) had the pull start glow knob and
 the top mounted oil filter.  In 1977 with the 123 240D they went to the
 key start.


--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
'90 300D, '87 300SDL,  '81 240D,  '78 450SLC
The FSM created the Diesel Benz
http://www.venganza.org/



Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-26 Thread Marshall Booth
All of the 617s had key operated glow/start. Th 616s didn't have key
start until the 123 models.

Marshall
-- 
Marshall Booth Ph.D. 
Ass't Prof. (ret.)
Univ of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Department of Pharmacology  1300 BST
Pittsburgh PA 15261 USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [MBZ] Car 'year'

2005-12-26 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin

the 300D did have the key start, 75  and 76

OK Don wrote:


OK. My '76 300D 617 had the bottom mounted oil filter and a key
operated glow/starting system. My '70 220D 615 had the pull start
system.

On 12/26/05, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


All 115 240D (1976 was the last year) had the pull start glow knob and
the top mounted oil filter.  In 1977 with the 123 240D they went to the
key start.





--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
'90 300D, '87 300SDL,  '81 240D,  '78 450SLC
The FSM created the Diesel Benz
http://www.venganza.org/

___
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 89 560SEL, 87 300SDL, 85 380SE, 85 300D,
 84 250 LWB, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D, 81 240D,
 76 450SEL, 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 69 250
http://www.striplin.net