Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:26:52 -0800 Zoltan Finks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This reminds me of an annoying habit of someone I know: they often stand right in front of the eye-level microwave and look at the cooking food. Then when they believe it's done, they simply open the door - no shutting the thing off first. I shut it off and wait for a few seconds before opening the door, and if time allows, I open it and walk away and do something else for a few seconds. Ok I am starting to sound paranoid now. Yes. Craig ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
This reminds me of an annoying habit of someone I know: they often stand right in front of the eye-level microwave and look at the cooking food. Then when they believe it's done, they simply open the door - no shutting the thing off first. I shut it off and wait for a few seconds before opening the door, and if time allows, I open it and walk away and do something else for a few seconds. Ok I am starting to sound paranoid now. Yes. Craig Those are very high frequency (therefore very short [micro] wave length) radio waves. They are bouncing around inside that metal box at nearly the speed of light, being absorbed by whatever is in there getting heated up. It doesn't take them very long to finish bouncing around and get absorbed after the power is turned off, which opening the door does. Nuking the food is a gross miss use of terms ond concepts, unless limited to expressing high tech. -- OK Don, KD5NRO Norman, OK There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics. -Benjamin Disraeli and/or Mark Twain '90 300D, '87 300SDL, '81 240D, '78 450SLC, '97 Ply Grand Voyager ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
Those are nuking at 2450 MHz, where water is really really good at absorbing that freq. Notice that freq is in an unlicensed band. Notice also all the gadgets that use that same freq to broadcast their waves, and then think about that! What are you made of? --R OK Don wrote: Those are very high frequency (therefore very short [micro] wave length) radio waves. They are bouncing around inside that metal box at nearly the speed of light, being absorbed by whatever is in there getting heated up. It doesn't take them very long to finish bouncing around and get absorbed after the power is turned off, which opening the door does. Nuking the food is a gross miss use of terms ond concepts, unless limited to expressing high tech. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
And, expanding on Glen's comment, the new digital sensors are even more sensitive. Then, there's the recent article in Der Spiegel - A mounting number of studies are coming to some surprising conclusions about the dangers of nuclear radiation. It might not be as deadly as is widely believed. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,519043,00.html Since the sources aren't given, I won't vouch for the accuracy, but it does raise questions. On Nov 30, 2007 3:03 PM, Glenn Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Expanding a bit on OK Don's recent post regarding . . . x-rays use much less radiation, the exposure level required has reduced as well due to photographic film advances as I was privy to one of these during my career in EK research. G. M. Brown Brevard, NC -- OK Don, KD5NRO Norman, OK There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics. -Benjamin Disraeli and/or Mark Twain '90 300D, '87 300SDL, '81 240D, '78 450SLC, '97 Ply Grand Voyager ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
John Robbins wrote: I think you just dated yourself ;) He was a boy in West Virginia in 1981? ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
Rich Thomas wrote: Speaking of X-rays, when I was a kid the shoe store had an Xray machine you could see how the shoe looked on your foot! I wanted to try it once but my mother wouldn't let me. I thought it was way cool. Like these? I wonder if something like this with modern tech (lower exposure needed for the cameras, etc) would be possible. It is definitely cool! http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/shoefittingfluor/shoe.htm http://www.museumofquackery.com/devices/shoexray.htm I think you just dated yourself ;) John ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
People in developed countries have had their lifespans increase a lot over the last 50-100 years, despite all the scares about this that and the other thing (coffee good! ooops no coffee bad!, well, a little is OK!). Since people aren't generally dying now from preventable/curable/treatable diseases, now the third or fourth-order things become issues. Eat well, exercise, go to the doc occasionally, brush your teeth, get vaccinations, have a beer or wine, don't smoke, stay away from crazies, don't do stupid things, and you will very likely live a long full happy life, and live long enough for the old age things finally to kill you, at 100+. Some won't; many will. Speaking of X-rays, when I was a kid the shoe store had an Xray machine you could see how the shoe looked on your foot! I wanted to try it once but my mother wouldn't let me. I thought it was way cool. Aura mediocritas! --R Zoltan Finks wrote: I don't know what I believe. As always, this is why I put the question out there. I'm glad for your health success. Best to you. Brian ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
I remember when my Uncle bought one of the first 21 color TVs. It was a RCA. 4 months later they recalled the set, installed a piece of heavy leaded glass in front of the tube applied a label right under the tube that stated (from memory) Never sit closer than 4 feet and never sit further out than 45 degrees from center when watching this television set. X-rays? Less Radiation? X-rays are a form of radiation! But then so are light, heat (infra red), radio signals, cell phone signals. The difference is the type of radiation. Tom www.kegkits.com Original Message From: Glenn Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/30/07 03:04 PM To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Subject: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Expanding a bit on OK Don's recent post regarding . . . x-rays use much less radiation, the exposure level required has reduced as well due to photographic film advances as I was privy to one of these during my career in EK research. G. M. Brown Brevard, NC ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
I don't know what I believe. As always, this is why I put the question out there. I'm glad for your health success. Best to you. Brian On 11/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Benifit FAR out weighs the risk. If you do not believe this, fine. Pete, who's life has been enhanced if not saved by diagnostic x-ray. -- Original message -- From: Zoltan Finks [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can it harmful yet the fear of it be unfounded or foolhardy? I cross the sreet only when necessary. Brian On 11/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Diagnostic X-Rays are harmful Crossing the Street is Dangerous Unfounded fear of either is foolhardy. -- Regards, Peter T. Arnold 2007 HHR, 2.4L/Auto, LT2, 19Kmi, No problems! 1987 300SDL 286 KMI Relocated to Cleveland, home of RR 1995 F-250 PowerChoke 199Kmi 1954 Metropolitan Convertible, Hanger Queen Wife has a Cruizer, 87 Kmi, as reliable as an Ice Box, the car that is! On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:10:46 -0800, you wrote: Wow, this is the first actual acknowledgement I have heard that x-rays are potentially dangerous. Every doc and dentist I go to absolutely downplays and poo-poos my questions regarding the topic. I had a dentist tell me that we are exposed to more radiation by flying in an airplane than we are from an x-ray. When the dentist I started going to insisted (not asked) that they were going to x-ray me every other visit, I refused and stopped going to them. They did get an x-ray out of me though, and when I asked why they didn't give me the lead vest, they said that the state of Minnesota no longer required them. And when I had a wisdom tooth pulled recently, the Mayo Clinic tried twice to get an x-ray simply because they couldn't find the one my dentist sent them. X-ray happy. Brian Larry wrote; Yep, there is much concern in some quarters about the amount of radiation we receive each time we get a chest X Ray - a typical component of a yearly physical. And I hear radiation is cummulative - it builds with each exposure so a 10 year exposure is 1 xray times 10. Amd being aimed at the important heart lungs makes is especially worrisome. I have a report around here somewhere written by a doctor a year or 2 ago - will try to find it. We're really pretty fragile beings - Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
I was wondering when someone would recall those shoe fitting fluoroscopes. The had three viewing ports, one for child, one for mom and one for the shoe salesman. Heck, I learned to crawl as a baby 'cause I was jonesin' for perogoric. Family doctor once recommended menthol cigarettes to help with congestion. I remember my mom going to the druggist and asking for a package of Kools menthol. on 11/30/07 5:06 PM, Rich Thomas at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People in developed countries have had their lifespans increase a lot over the last 50-100 years, despite all the scares about this that and the other thing (coffee good! ooops no coffee bad!, well, a little is OK!). Since people aren't generally dying now from preventable/curable/treatable diseases, now the third or fourth-order things become issues. Eat well, exercise, go to the doc occasionally, brush your teeth, get vaccinations, have a beer or wine, don't smoke, stay away from crazies, don't do stupid things, and you will very likely live a long full happy life, and live long enough for the old age things finally to kill you, at 100+. Some won't; many will. Speaking of X-rays, when I was a kid the shoe store had an Xray machine you could see how the shoe looked on your foot! I wanted to try it once but my mother wouldn't let me. I thought it was way cool. Aura mediocritas! --R Zoltan Finks wrote: I don't know what I believe. As always, this is why I put the question out there. I'm glad for your health success. Best to you. Brian ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
Benifit FAR out weighs the risk. If you do not believe this, fine. Pete, who's life has been enhanced if not saved by diagnostic x-ray. -- Original message -- From: Zoltan Finks [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can it harmful yet the fear of it be unfounded or foolhardy? I cross the sreet only when necessary. Brian On 11/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Diagnostic X-Rays are harmful Crossing the Street is Dangerous Unfounded fear of either is foolhardy. -- Regards, Peter T. Arnold 2007 HHR, 2.4L/Auto, LT2, 19Kmi, No problems! 1987 300SDL 286 KMI Relocated to Cleveland, home of RR 1995 F-250 PowerChoke 199Kmi 1954 Metropolitan Convertible, Hanger Queen Wife has a Cruizer, 87 Kmi, as reliable as an Ice Box, the car that is! On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:10:46 -0800, you wrote: Wow, this is the first actual acknowledgement I have heard that x-rays are potentially dangerous. Every doc and dentist I go to absolutely downplays and poo-poos my questions regarding the topic. I had a dentist tell me that we are exposed to more radiation by flying in an airplane than we are from an x-ray. When the dentist I started going to insisted (not asked) that they were going to x-ray me every other visit, I refused and stopped going to them. They did get an x-ray out of me though, and when I asked why they didn't give me the lead vest, they said that the state of Minnesota no longer required them. And when I had a wisdom tooth pulled recently, the Mayo Clinic tried twice to get an x-ray simply because they couldn't find the one my dentist sent them. X-ray happy. Brian Larry wrote; Yep, there is much concern in some quarters about the amount of radiation we receive each time we get a chest X Ray - a typical component of a yearly physical. And I hear radiation is cummulative - it builds with each exposure so a 10 year exposure is 1 xray times 10. Amd being aimed at the important heart lungs makes is especially worrisome. I have a report around here somewhere written by a doctor a year or 2 ago - will try to find it. We're really pretty fragile beings - Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
How can it harmful yet the fear of it be unfounded or foolhardy? I cross the sreet only when necessary. Brian On 11/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Diagnostic X-Rays are harmful Crossing the Street is Dangerous Unfounded fear of either is foolhardy. -- Regards, Peter T. Arnold 2007 HHR, 2.4L/Auto, LT2, 19Kmi, No problems! 1987 300SDL 286 KMI Relocated to Cleveland, home of RR 1995 F-250 PowerChoke 199Kmi 1954 Metropolitan Convertible, Hanger Queen Wife has a Cruizer, 87 Kmi, as reliable as an Ice Box, the car that is! On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:10:46 -0800, you wrote: Wow, this is the first actual acknowledgement I have heard that x-rays are potentially dangerous. Every doc and dentist I go to absolutely downplays and poo-poos my questions regarding the topic. I had a dentist tell me that we are exposed to more radiation by flying in an airplane than we are from an x-ray. When the dentist I started going to insisted (not asked) that they were going to x-ray me every other visit, I refused and stopped going to them. They did get an x-ray out of me though, and when I asked why they didn't give me the lead vest, they said that the state of Minnesota no longer required them. And when I had a wisdom tooth pulled recently, the Mayo Clinic tried twice to get an x-ray simply because they couldn't find the one my dentist sent them. X-ray happy. Brian Larry wrote; Yep, there is much concern in some quarters about the amount of radiation we receive each time we get a chest X Ray - a typical component of a yearly physical. And I hear radiation is cummulative - it builds with each exposure so a 10 year exposure is 1 xray times 10. Amd being aimed at the important heart lungs makes is especially worrisome. I have a report around here somewhere written by a doctor a year or 2 ago - will try to find it. We're really pretty fragile beings - Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
Diagnostic X-Rays are harmful Crossing the Street is Dangerous Unfounded fear of either is foolhardy. -- Regards, Peter T. Arnold 2007 HHR, 2.4L/Auto, LT2, 19Kmi, No problems! 1987 300SDL 286 KMI Relocated to Cleveland, home of RR 1995 F-250 PowerChoke 199Kmi 1954 Metropolitan Convertible, Hanger Queen Wife has a Cruizer, 87 Kmi, as reliable as an Ice Box, the car that is! On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:10:46 -0800, you wrote: Wow, this is the first actual acknowledgement I have heard that x-rays are potentially dangerous. Every doc and dentist I go to absolutely downplays and poo-poos my questions regarding the topic. I had a dentist tell me that we are exposed to more radiation by flying in an airplane than we are from an x-ray. When the dentist I started going to insisted (not asked) that they were going to x-ray me every other visit, I refused and stopped going to them. They did get an x-ray out of me though, and when I asked why they didn't give me the lead vest, they said that the state of Minnesota no longer required them. And when I had a wisdom tooth pulled recently, the Mayo Clinic tried twice to get an x-ray simply because they couldn't find the one my dentist sent them. X-ray happy. Brian Larry wrote; Yep, there is much concern in some quarters about the amount of radiation we receive each time we get a chest X Ray - a typical component of a yearly physical. And I hear radiation is cummulative - it builds with each exposure so a 10 year exposure is 1 xray times 10. Amd being aimed at the important heart lungs makes is especially worrisome. I have a report around here somewhere written by a doctor a year or 2 ago - will try to find it. We're really pretty fragile beings - Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
Mitch Haley wrote: John Robbins wrote: I think you just dated yourself ;) He was a boy in West Virginia in 1981? Ha! That could very well be the case ;) It was only one machine though! ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
It's all a matter of managing risk. Dental x-rays use much less radiation than they did 30 years ago. There are new, faster, whole body 3-D scans that now use more radiation than the older methods -- you can't lump all diagnostic x-rays into one bucket and make blanket statements about safety, or the lack there-of. On Nov 30, 2007 4:59 AM, Zoltan Finks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can it harmful yet the fear of it be unfounded or foolhardy? I cross the sreet only when necessary. Brian On 11/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Diagnostic X-Rays are harmful Crossing the Street is Dangerous Unfounded fear of either is foolhardy. -- Regards, Peter T. Arnold 2007 HHR, 2.4L/Auto, LT2, 19Kmi, No problems! 1987 300SDL 286 KMI Relocated to Cleveland, home of RR 1995 F-250 PowerChoke 199Kmi 1954 Metropolitan Convertible, Hanger Queen Wife has a Cruizer, 87 Kmi, as reliable as an Ice Box, the car that is! On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:10:46 -0800, you wrote: Wow, this is the first actual acknowledgement I have heard that x-rays are potentially dangerous. Every doc and dentist I go to absolutely downplays and poo-poos my questions regarding the topic. I had a dentist tell me that we are exposed to more radiation by flying in an airplane than we are from an x-ray. When the dentist I started going to insisted (not asked) that they were going to x-ray me every other visit, I refused and stopped going to them. They did get an x-ray out of me though, and when I asked why they didn't give me the lead vest, they said that the state of Minnesota no longer required them. And when I had a wisdom tooth pulled recently, the Mayo Clinic tried twice to get an x-ray simply because they couldn't find the one my dentist sent them. X-ray happy. Brian Larry wrote; Yep, there is much concern in some quarters about the amount of radiation we receive each time we get a chest X Ray - a typical component of a yearly physical. And I hear radiation is cummulative - it builds with each exposure so a 10 year exposure is 1 xray times 10. Amd being aimed at the important heart lungs makes is especially worrisome. I have a report around here somewhere written by a doctor a year or 2 ago - will try to find it. We're really pretty fragile beings - Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com -- OK Don, KD5NRO Norman, OK There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics. -Benjamin Disraeli and/or Mark Twain '90 300D, '87 300SDL, '81 240D, '78 450SLC, '97 Ply Grand Voyager ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays
This reminds me of an annoying habit of someone I know: they often stand right in front of the eye-level microwave and look at the cooking food. Then when they believe it's done, they simply open the door - no shutting the thing off first. I shut it off and wait for a few seconds before opening the door, and if time allows, I open it and walk away and do something else for a few seconds. Ok I am starting to sound paranoid now. Brian On 11/30/07, Tom Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember when my Uncle bought one of the first 21 color TVs. It was a RCA. 4 months later they recalled the set, installed a piece of heavy leaded glass in front of the tube applied a label right under the tube that stated (from memory) Never sit closer than 4 feet and never sit further out than 45 degrees from center when watching this television set. X-rays? Less Radiation? X-rays are a form of radiation! But then so are light, heat (infra red), radio signals, cell phone signals. The difference is the type of radiation. Tom www.kegkits.com Original Message From: Glenn Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/30/07 03:04 PM To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Subject: [MBZ] OT Safety of X-rays -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Expanding a bit on OK Don's recent post regarding . . . x-rays use much less radiation, the exposure level required has reduced as well due to photographic film advances as I was privy to one of these during my career in EK research. G. M. Brown Brevard, NC ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com