Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-27 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "PD" == Pierre-Yves David writes: > On 5/27/23 08:43, Uwe Brauer wrote: >>> On 5/25/23 15:49, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> >>> Your changeset are not considered as part of the "default" branch >>> while there topic is active. The "default" keyword resolve to the head >>> of the un-topiced changeset

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-27 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 5/27/23 08:43, Uwe Brauer wrote: On 5/25/23 15:49, Uwe Brauer wrote: Your changeset are not considered as part of the "default" branch while there topic is active. The "default" keyword resolve to the head of the un-topiced changeset on default. This was an important update in topic

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-27 Thread Uwe Brauer
> On 5/25/23 15:49, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Your changeset are not considered as part of the "default" branch > while there topic is active. The "default" keyword resolve to the head > of the un-topiced changeset on default. This was an important update > in topic behavior we made a while back,

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-26 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 5/25/23 15:49, Uwe Brauer wrote: Hi Look at the following graph ○ changeset: 569:33171fb597a8 │ tag: tip │ Branch:default │ Author:Uwe Brauer │ Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:42:36 +0200 │ Topic: corrections │ Phase: draft │

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-26 Thread Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
Uwe Brauer writes: >>> In that case it would be great if you could file it as a bug and add the >>> reproduction commands. > >> There is a frequent confusion about the `phases.publish` configuration >> item : it is not about what happens with local manipulation commands >> such as `hg update`.

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-26 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "GR" == Georges Racinet writes: > Hi there, a precision > On 26/05/2023 07:30, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> Yes of course a local one >>> Is the repository set as publishing? >>> >>> Yes >>> >>> [phases] >>> publish = True >>> >>> >>> But I changed it to >>> >>> [phases] >>>

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-26 Thread Georges Racinet
Hi there, a precision On 26/05/2023 07:30, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: Yes of course a local one Is the repository set as publishing? Yes [phases] publish = True But I changed it to [phases] publish = False But it did not make any difference. Can you reproduce that in a set of

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-25 Thread Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
Uwe Brauer writes: "AB" == Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > >> Uwe Brauer writes: >>> hg up default >>> It does not jump to tip but to the last public change set on the default >>> branch, why? >>> hg up british >>> (Which is a secret phase) >>> abort: unknown revision 'british'! > >>

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "AB" == Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> hg up default >> >> It does not jump to tip but to the last public change set on the default >> branch, why? >> When I run >> >> hg up british >> >> (Which is a secret phase) >> >> I obtain >> >> >> abort: unknown

Re: hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-25 Thread Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
Uwe Brauer writes: > hg up default > > It does not jump to tip but to the last public change set on the default > branch, why? > When I run > > hg up british > > (Which is a secret phase) > > I obtain > > > abort: unknown revision 'british'! Are these in the same repository? Is the

hg up and phases, surprises

2023-05-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
Hi Look at the following graph ○ changeset: 569:33171fb597a8 │ tag: tip │ Branch:default │ Author:Uwe Brauer │ Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:42:36 +0200 │ Topic: corrections │ Phase: draft │ Summary: Ej2B change to singular │ │