At 23:53:33, Tuesday, 1/28/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use v22.12.1, and this is in my report from three consecutive days. No
> backups, etc, are involved, just normal proceeding from 65 to 66 bits
> (the estimated time to completion changed because I rearranged to worktodo.
> nothing to wo
> >Far be it from me to tell you that you are wrong, but that is not at all
> >consistent with what I observe with my own exponents. For instance,
> >exponent 19373911 shows a 9 right now, it connected a short while ago
and
> >the machine is early in the 66 bit pass. The percent complete is abo
At 01:19 AM 1/29/03 +0100, =?utf-8?Q?Torben_Schl=C3=BCntz?= wrote:
17914693 at helly will expire very soon according to the 60 days
rule. And I can't do anything about it. It just will happen.
No biggee. I think I've already picked up and completed one of helly's
expiries. Most likely
Fra: Mary K. Conner
Sendt: ti 28-01-2003 06:36
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Emne: Re: Mersenne: An officially sanctioned poach
17035867 351.0 JohnMartin Don
17137801 351.0 JohnMartin Don
17211269 351.0 JohnMartin Don
17914693 384.5 tschelly
At 10:02 AM 1/28/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Far be it from me to tell you that you are wrong, but that is not at all
consistent with what I observe with my own exponents. For instance,
exponent 19373911 shows a 9 right now, it connected a short while ago and
the machine is early in the 66 bit pass
Thanks for the insight that some of these exponents might be reporting no
progress because they were manually reserved and running on a UNIX or MAC
box.
I've pruned the list a little bit and released the exponents.
_
Unsubscr
At 10:08 AM 1/28/03 -0500, George Woltman wrote:
At 09:36 PM 1/27/2003 -0800, Mary K. Conner wrote:
Garo identified some Team_Prime_Rib exponents in there.
I'll exempt all Team_Prime_Rib exponents
Looking at the other exponents in the factoring range
I'm not worried about reclaiming factori
At 10:00 AM 1/28/03 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The tsc machines show some very odd behavior. The exponents do a "red
> light, green light" game. One exponent I've been following started at 5,
> went to 2, back up to 5, then ran all the way up to 15 before dropping
back
> to nothing an
At 09:36 PM 1/27/2003 -0800, Mary K. Conner wrote:
Garo identified some Team_Prime_Rib exponents in there.
I'll exempt all Team_Prime_Rib exponents
Looking at the other exponents in the factoring range
I'm not worried about reclaiming factoring assignments right now.
The tsc machines show
> The tsc machines show some very odd behavior. The exponents do a "red
> light, green light" game. One exponent I've been following started at 5,
> went to 2, back up to 5, then ran all the way up to 15 before dropping
back
> to nothing and now it shows a 1. Others are similarly dancing aro
George,
Can you clarify again what no progress is? The same person who
has the exponents you mentioned also has several exponent that show up 1
iteration complete. Are you going to nuke those as well?
The one group of people I'm a bit afraid for - since I have
belonged to that grou
At 03:29 PM 1/27/03 -0500, George Woltman wrote:
It's been quite awhile since I've done a release of exponents
that seem to be stuck - probably over a year.
I've identified 185 exponents that have had NO progress reported and are
either:
a) Below 12,000,000 and been assigned for 200 days or more
At 10:23 PM 1/27/2003 +0100, Torben Schlüntz wrote:
I don't really understand the question. If these 185
assignments have made NO progress in a year why didn't they expire in
about 60 days automaticly?
Do you by NO progress mean close to NO progress?
Look at this
> I've identified 185 exponents that have had NO progress reported and are
> either:
> a) Below 12,000,000 and been assigned for 200 days or more, or
> b) Between 12 and 20 million and been assigned for 300 days or more
>
> Does anyone see any problems with releasing these exponents back into
> t
Fra: George Woltman
Sendt: ma 27-01-2003 21:29
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Emne: Mersenne: An officially sanctioned poach
It's been quite awhile since I've done a release of
exponents
that seem to be stuck - probably o
It's been quite awhile since I've done a release of exponents
that seem to be stuck - probably over a year.
I've identified 185 exponents that have had NO progress reported and are
either:
a) Below 12,000,000 and been assigned for 200 days or more, or
b) Between 12 and 20 million and been assign
16 matches
Mail list logo
