Hi all,
Daniel Swanson wrote:
7019297 57 DF 160100125459121849 27-Sep-01 22:52
7020641 58 DF 226230108157229263 30-Sep-01 02:05
7025987 56 DF 74052063365823791 30-Sep-01 01:12
7027303 55 DF 31090234297428433 30-Sep-01 22:14
7028947 58 DF 203918491658210359 01-Oct-01
At 04:07 PM 9/30/2001 -0700, Daniel Swanson wrote:
I went through the Cleared Exponents
report looking for other examples of factors found during
double-checks that
should have been found during the initial factorization.
5977297 53 DF6726544627832489
6019603 57 DF
I believe the idea of trying to skip P-1 factoring was talked about
within
the last 3 or 4 months. Apparently there are people who would just
prefer
to get credit for doing LL work than to find factors.
This is why I like that you loose credit for a LL-test if someone else
finds a
Carleton Garrison wrote:
[? wrote:]
This is why I like that you lose credit for a LL-test if someone else
finds a factor later, or if two other independant checks prove your
result to be wrong.
Me too. I understand that George's top producer page does this, while the
PrimeNet stat
PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: Mersenne: Re: Factoring Failure?
Hello all,
I have browsed some logs I archived long time ago and I have found this:
In may 1998, one user, tomfakes, cleared around 80 exponents with factor
found = 1
It was in the range 7013000-7055000.
Regards,
Jean-Yves
On Wed, 03 Oct 2001 18:29:52 -0700, Gerry Snyder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, at least in theory, every Mersenne number proven non-prime will
eventually be factored. Again, to me, so what? At least the LL test
showed that further factoring activity would eventually succeed.
It might be
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:52:42 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However if it could be established that all the missed factors
reported were the work of one user, perhaps it would be worth fixing
the database to force rerunning of trial factoring for those factoring
assignments run by that user
If we could indeed track these to a single user, I've got about 25-30 AMD
1.2 GHz processors that I could throw at the situation for a short time,
just to quickly re-trial factor these and put our minds to rest.
Aaron
- Original Message -
However if it could be established that all the
Hi,
At 04:07 PM 9/30/2001 -0700, Daniel Swanson wrote:
I went through the Cleared Exponents
report looking for other examples of factors found during double-checks that
should have been found during the initial factorization.
5977297 53 DF6726544627832489
6019603 57 DF
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George
Woltman
Sent: lundi 1 octobre 2001 21:01
To: Daniel Swanson; Mersenne Digest
Subject: Re: Mersenne: Re: Factoring Failure?
Hi,
At 04:07 PM 9/30/2001 -0700, Daniel Swanson wrote:
I went through the Cleared Exponents
report looking for other examples
10 matches
Mail list logo
