On Wednesday 30 October 2002 02:34, Nathan Russell wrote:
Thanks to everyone who responded. In this case, it's a bug in my
thinking. I had the memory usage set to the max allowable, because I
wanted P-1 to succeed whenever possible, even if it inconvenienced me
- I do most of my academic
Let's not be _too_ eager to emulate SETIhome's popularity
and user-friendliness --
http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/security/story/0,224985,20269509,00
.htm
Cheats wreak havoc on SETIhome: participants
SETIhome administrators are allegedly ignoring claims that the
project is being sabotaged
Hi,
Wouldn't it be great if from some point in the near future, feature
request posts to this newsgroup became more like I've written a
fancy
improved frontend to GIMPS with some cool graphics, see this link
for
more
info,
Actually that happened Sunday!
Would you please give some
This is what the whatsnew.txt file has to say about starting at bootup:
On a Windows NT/2000/XP system, if prime95 is run by a user without
administrator privileges then prime95 cannot install itself as a service.
Thus, the Start at Bootup option will set prime95 to run at login time
Yeah, I noticed that one of their top 100 users has an average work unit time
of less than 30 minutes. Compare that to the ~22 hours I'm getting for a PII
450Mhz, and the SGI team's average of over 6 hours even though they're running
on just about the most powerful (and sadly, most expensive
Dear Brian,
Could you please expand upon how this secure certificate concept would work, for
the benefit of myself and the list? Unless there is more to it than I currently
comprehend, this only authenticates results as coming from specific users,
rather than authenticating that the result is
