On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:56:30PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
those are very fast CD readers too... I dunno CD-RW, never had much use for
them, but the bulk TDK blanks I get at Costco seem to burn 100% AOK at 40X,
and you can make a 700MB data backup in just a couple of minutes.
One should
Get a P4 motherboard that supportes DDR333 (PC2700). Then buy the
Extreme PC2700 memory from www.corsair.com. It has a significant
performance-enhancing feature: 2.0 cycle latency versus the more
standard 2.5. This high-performance Corsair memory only costs a few
bucks more than standard PC2700
Personally, I just ordered a brand spankin' new Compaq server (ugh... HP
server now) with dual P4 Xeon 2.8 GHZ processors, 3GB of RAM. I can't
wait to get my hot little hands on that and see just how well it
crunches the #'s. It's memory is 200MHz DDR (FSB is 400MHz), advanced
ECC (Compaq's
On Monday 25 November 2002 12:36, you wrote:
One should basically not use a CD-R/CD-RW as a general CD reader, since it
usually has way lower MTBF than a normal CD/DVD reader, and is more
expensive. Ie. it breaks a lot earlier if you use it a lot, and it's more
expensive to replace :-)
Did
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
From: Brian J. Beesley
Sendt: lø 23-11-2002 13:23
This is not a particularly effective cheat; you still end up having to
do
significantly more than half of the computational work. Is there any
evidence
that this may be happening?
No, and I am not the
From: John R Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
the fastest P4 cpus have a rated FSB of 533
(which is 266*2). running the bus at 333(666)
would be overclocking.
No, it wouldn't.
I don't think you understand how the memory architecture of a modern
Intel chipset works. The memory clock speed
the fastest P4 cpus have a rated FSB of 533 (which is 266*2). running
the
bus at 333(666) would be overclocking.
Ah, but most modern mobos can run the memory asynchronously to the
processor
bus. I think this goes back some way - certainly the Abit KT7A board
(Athlon)
could run the
At 11:04 PM 11/25/02 +0100, =?utf-8?Q?Torben_Schl=C3=BCntz?= wrote:
No, and I am not the GIMPS police. It would offcourse be quite
easy simply to check all accounts having done 5+ years TF and having
more than 0,6 years pr. foundfactor. On the other hand some accounts
could be very old
From: John R Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
ok, true. I forgot VIA is allowing this. AFAIK,
the i845pe doesn't support memory faster than the
CPU FSB (it allows SLOWER memory, the older i845e
only supported 100/200Mhz DDR w/a 133/266/533 CPU bus).
Look again... the 845PE and 845GE
- Original Message -
From: Torben Schlüntz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian J. Beesley [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:04 PM
Subject: SV: SV: SV: Mersenne: Drifting UP(!) in Top Producers ranking?
I'd rather not like the penalty/ punishment. A reward
10 matches
Mail list logo
