On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:13, Dylan Baker wrote:
>
> Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-12-12 04:16:51)
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 07:45, Rhys Kidd wrote:
> > >
> > > Emil and Dylan,
> > >
> > > I took a go at addressing the limited number of remaining meson-based
> > > travis-ci errors. This series
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-12-12 04:16:51)
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 07:45, Rhys Kidd wrote:
> >
> > Emil and Dylan,
> >
> > I took a go at addressing the limited number of remaining meson-based
> > travis-ci errors. This series applies on top of the work Dylan circulated
> > yesterday, and which
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:19 AM Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 07:45, Rhys Kidd wrote:
> >
> > Emil and Dylan,
> >
> > I took a go at addressing the limited number of remaining meson-based
> > travis-ci errors. This series applies on top of the work Dylan circulated
> > yesterday,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 07:45, Rhys Kidd wrote:
>
> Emil and Dylan,
>
> I took a go at addressing the limited number of remaining meson-based
> travis-ci errors. This series applies on top of the work Dylan circulated
> yesterday, and which can be seen here:
>
> > Could you help me debug my WIP
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 08:44, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>
> What's the point of maintaining Travis? Shouldn't we just drop it in
> favour of Gitlab CI? IIRC, Igalia worked on it.
>
Personally I'm the more the merrier kind of person. It allows wider
(and crazier) testing catching more corner-cases.
Am Mi., 12. Dez. 2018 um 09:44 Uhr schrieb Samuel Pitoiset
:
>
> What's the point of maintaining Travis? Shouldn't we just drop it in
> favour of Gitlab CI? IIRC, Igalia worked on it.
>
Until Gitlab CI is ready for public use I like the idea that my wip
mesa branches @github run through
Travis
What's the point of maintaining Travis? Shouldn't we just drop it in
favour of Gitlab CI? IIRC, Igalia worked on it.
On 12/12/18 8:45 AM, Rhys Kidd wrote:
Emil and Dylan,
I took a go at addressing the limited number of remaining meson-based
travis-ci errors. This series applies on top of the
Emil and Dylan,
I took a go at addressing the limited number of remaining meson-based
travis-ci errors. This series applies on top of the work Dylan circulated
yesterday, and which can be seen here:
> Could you help me debug my WIP of porting the autotools tests
> to meson? They're just
