On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 22 September 2016 at 08:10, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Kenneth Graunke
>> wrote:
>>> Commit 5921f372c89a68fac6ddefc009442721d9df4db2
On 22 September 2016 at 08:10, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Kenneth Graunke
> wrote:
>> Commit 5921f372c89a68fac6ddefc009442721d9df4db2 exposed GLES 3.1 symbols
>> in libGLESv2.so. Are we supposed to do the same thing for
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Commit 5921f372c89a68fac6ddefc009442721d9df4db2 exposed GLES 3.1 symbols
> in libGLESv2.so. Are we supposed to do the same thing for GLES 3.2?
>
> I imagine we're supposed to, but I'm not certain what spec actually
Commit 5921f372c89a68fac6ddefc009442721d9df4db2 exposed GLES 3.1 symbols
in libGLESv2.so. Are we supposed to do the same thing for GLES 3.2?
I imagine we're supposed to, but I'm not certain what spec actually
defines the ABI or where to look.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally