https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109159
--- Comment #3 from Jason Ekstrand ---
I just saw this randomly show up on ANV in our CI system. This is the first
time I've seen this test fail in a long time so I think there's a random
element to it.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #63 from Thomas Crider ---
(In reply to Axel Davy from comment #62)
> I believe the generic configuration proposed answers your OOTB concern. Mesa
> packs a default drirc (not visible anymore to the user):
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #64 from Thomas Crider ---
actually if I move it to main/getstring it may skip having to edit any of
those. will post back shortly with some changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are
To be honest I have mixed feelings about using Gitlab merge requests. As
Jason mentions bellow the discussions feature is a nice way to avoid the
mess that can happen with mailings list replys.
However I seem to find myself fighting with the interface more that
should be necessary. Most of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35268
Clayton Craft changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clayton.a.cr...@intel.com
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108946
MGG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109082
Vinson Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109023
Vinson Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||109323
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109323
Vinson Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||109023
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109323
Vinson Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||109129
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109129
Vinson Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||109323
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
Thomas Crider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #143089|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109327
Bas Nieuwenhuizen changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|dri-devel@lists.freedesktop |mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.
On 12/01/2019 18:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:40 AM Gert Wollny wrote:
I will not push it with
the strong NAK you gave, Ilia. To me consensus means that all who
contribute significantly to the project (like you certainly do) agree
or abstain, but don't object.
A single
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109334
Bug ID: 109334
Summary: OpenGL-OpenCL interop support
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109242
--- Comment #30 from Roman Elshin ---
>https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/109/diffs?commit_id=70aa51f2bf7a4f64df166e4c94936d49814d482f
>Created attachment 143082 [details] [review]
Are both patches must be applied? (it
We want to have debug info as well if using
meson's debugoptimized when ndebug is off.
v2: use u_debug functions that do something
even if DEBUG is not set.
Signed-off-by: Axel Davy
---
src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/basetexture9.c | 6 +++---
src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/basetexture9.h |
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109339
Bug ID: 109339
Summary: Wolfenstein II The New Colossus - a lot of missing
objects
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109327
--- Comment #4 from Ahmed Elsayed ---
My new bug report https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109339
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the
I think this is done with
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/55025/
?
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 12:53 AM Marek Olšák wrote:
>
> From: Marek Olšák
>
> ---
> src/amd/common/ac_llvm_build.c | 18 +-
> .../drivers/radeonsi/si_shader_tgsi_mem.c | 4 ++--
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109327
Ahmed Elsayed changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #58 from Axel Davy ---
is very specific.
I think this would be more generic:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #59 from Thomas Crider ---
Axel Davy the driconf are booleans, not meant to work that way, also not meant
to have users intervene as it's to be an OOTB fix. Additionally the vendor name
change is driver specific (see patch changes in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #60 from Axel Davy ---
The driconf options can be string, look at
DRI_CONF_DEVICE_ID_PATH_TAG
Plus you can make the driconf option driver specific (I don't remember the
exact syntax, I think you have to put driver="radeonsi" in the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
Thomas J. Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dark...@gmail.com |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #61 from Thomas Crider ---
I still feel it's better to set as a boolean and adjust per driver accordingly
where the X.Org string is usually spit out, rather than having it set as a
string. OOTB = out of the box - meaning users would
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #62 from Axel Davy ---
I believe the generic configuration proposed answers your OOTB concern. Mesa
packs a default drirc (not visible anymore to the user):
src/util/00-mesa-defaults.conf
As you can see there are already radeonsi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
Thomas Crider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #125302|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109242
--- Comment #31 from Roman Elshin ---
>Are both patches must be applied? (it was tested only first or second, not
>>together).
With both patches applied i can't reproduce this issue, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109339
--- Comment #1 from Ahmed Elsayed ---
Created attachment 143091
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=143091=edit
No floors or walls.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109339
Ahmed Elsayed changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #143091|No floors or walls. |No floors, roofs or walls.
Currently we were only returning it for BGRA8. But it makes sense to
return it for all the BGR[AX] variants. This was discovered when
figuring out why wlroots was sending a RGBX instead of BGRX image when
screenshotting.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
Not sure that this can really matter for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #56 from Thomas J. Moore ---
(In reply to Thomas Crider from comment #55)
> With this patch users should be able to just apply the patch to mesa and run
> the game. No shim needed.
You seem to have missed the purpose of the shim.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
--- Comment #57 from Thomas Crider ---
I understand the purpose of the shim quite clearly. My problem is I've reached
out to the game developers via e-mail correspondence regarding the issue, and
they were unwilling to try to fix it on their
On 1/11/19 5:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for that massive undertaking in addressing this.
On 2019/01/04, Kevin Strasser wrote:
The dri core api was written with the assumption that all attribute values
would fit into 32 bits. This limitation means the config handlers can't
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 11:14 -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:13 AM Iago Toral Quiroga > wrote:
> > We had defined MAX_IMAGES as 8, which we used to size the array for
> >
> > image push constant data. The comment there stated that this was
> > for
> >
> > gen8, but
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109334
--- Comment #1 from Tapani Pälli ---
Just wanted to note that we are also missing EGL_KHR_cl_event2, AFAIK this is
the only missing bit from promoting our EGL to 1.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 12:20 -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:19 AM Iago Toral wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 09:39 -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > > This function is modeled after the aux_op functions except that
> > it
> >
> > > has a
> >
> > > lot more
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 12:31 -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:21 AM Iago Toral wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 09:39 -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > > ---
> >
> > > src/intel/vulkan/anv_device.c | 28 ++
> >
> > > src/intel/vulkan/anv_extensions.py | 1
39 matches
Mail list logo
