Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 12/14] intel/blorp: Add indirect clear color support to mcs_partial_resolve

On 24/02/18 05:58, Jason Ekstrand wrote: Won't this need some swizzling somewhere? Either when storing the color in the fast clear colors (behind the aux surface) or here in the shader? Good question...  I'll have to think on it more but we probably do. No, we

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 12/14] intel/blorp: Add indirect clear color support to mcs_partial_resolve

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Lionel Landwerlin < > lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com> wrote: > >> On 13/11/17 16:12, Jason Ekstrand wrote: >> >>> This is a bit complicated because we have to get the indirect clear >>>

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 12/14] intel/blorp: Add indirect clear color support to mcs_partial_resolve

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Lionel Landwerlin < lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com> wrote: > On 13/11/17 16:12, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > >> This is a bit complicated because we have to get the indirect clear >> color in there somehow. In order to not do any more work in the shader >> than needed,

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 12/14] intel/blorp: Add indirect clear color support to mcs_partial_resolve

On 13/11/17 16:12, Jason Ekstrand wrote: This is a bit complicated because we have to get the indirect clear color in there somehow. In order to not do any more work in the shader than needed, we set it up as it's own vertex binding which points directly at the clear color address specified by

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 12/14] intel/blorp: Add indirect clear color support to mcs_partial_resolve

This is a bit complicated because we have to get the indirect clear color in there somehow. In order to not do any more work in the shader than needed, we set it up as it's own vertex binding which points directly at the clear color address specified by the client. ---