"Mao, David" writes:
> Hi Keith,
> If I read the patch correctly, the plane has been interpreted as the same as
> connector, and the stackIndex is the index of connector of current device.
> Is it by intentional?
> If the hardware don't have underlay/overlay supported, is it
Hi Keith,
If I read the patch correctly, the plane has been interpreted as the same as
connector, and the stackIndex is the index of connector of current device.
Is it by intentional?
If the hardware don't have underlay/overlay supported, is it better to always
report plane 0 rather than pretend
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> Once we're sure that's what we want, create an MR against the spec that
> just adds enough to the XML to reserve your extension number. That will
> get merged almost
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > I think I like option 1 (KEITHP_kms_display). If the client knows the
> > difference between render and primary for 2, then they are most likely
> > already opening the
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> I think I like option 1 (KEITHP_kms_display). If the client knows the
> difference between render and primary for 2, then they are most likely
> already opening the master node themselves or at least have access to
> the FD.
Ok, I'll work on
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > It seems a little odd to me to default to opening the master node and
> then
> > fall back to the render node if it doesn't work. I suppose that's
> probably
> > ok so
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> It seems a little odd to me to default to opening the master node and then
> fall back to the render node if it doesn't work. I suppose that's probably
> ok so long as we ensure that vkGetPhysicalDeviceDisplayPropertiesKHR
> returns no displays if
Emil Velikov writes:
> A few top level comments:
Thanks much for looking over this code. I realize it's a large amount of
change and hence more work to review.
> - using card/primary node and (missing) authentication
> Current code opens the primary node when
Eric Engestrom writes:
> copy/paste error: s/drm/display/
That's actually intentional -- any system which supports 'drm' can
support the display backend as it's based on that. Maybe it should use a
different test? (note that I haven't been using the autotools backend
Hi Keith,
A few top level comments:
- using card/primary node and (missing) authentication
Current code opens the primary node when VK_KHR_display is available.
Thus running a platform=drm,x11,wayland build will fail, as the client
is not authenticated with the X/WL server.
- reuse "drm" as a
On Friday, 2018-02-09 20:45:10 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> This adds support for the KHR_display extension to the anv and radv
> Vulkan drivers. The drivers now attempt to open the master DRM node
> when the KHR_display extension is requested so that the common winsys
> code can perform the
This adds support for the KHR_display extension to the anv and radv
Vulkan drivers. The drivers now attempt to open the master DRM node
when the KHR_display extension is requested so that the common winsys
code can perform the necessary operations.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
12 matches
Mail list logo