On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 17:11 +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 11/08/17 02:13 AM, Jan Vesely wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 17:45 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > >
> > > Topic for another thread:
> > > There's been a handful of issues reported with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON.
> > > Should we consider tha
On 15/08/17 07:55 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
>> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/08/17 01:45 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, pushed.
>>
>>
>> Don't know if this is expected or not, but llvm built like -
>>
>> cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
>
> Also, llvm-config --version says "6.0.0git-f49c401", which means I had
> to manually hack configure.ac every time to "6.0.0svn" to get mesa
> building too :(
Nevermind about this one, -DLLVM_APPEND_VC_REV=OFF solves it. Would be
great
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>
>> On 11/08/17 01:45 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, pushed.
>
>
> Don't know if this is expected or not, but llvm built like -
>
> cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
> -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 11/08/17 01:45 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 9 August 2017 at 02:00, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 09/08/17 03:24 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
I think we'd want to keep the best of both - just not sure how to
exactly do that.
--libs/--libfiles was completely busted with LLVM 3.9 an
On 11/08/17 02:13 AM, Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 17:45 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> Topic for another thread:
>> There's been a handful of issues reported with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON.
>> Should we consider that unsupported setup and error out?
I don't really see the point / gain i
On 11/08/17 01:45 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 9 August 2017 at 02:00, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 09/08/17 03:24 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we'd want to keep the best of both - just not sure how to
>>> exactly do that.
>>> --libs/--libfiles was completely busted with LLVM 3.9 and is b
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 17:45 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 9 August 2017 at 02:00, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On 09/08/17 03:24 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > On 8 August 2017 at 08:23, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > From: Michel Dänzer
> > > >
> > > > No need to manually look for the library files
On 9 August 2017 at 02:00, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 09/08/17 03:24 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 8 August 2017 at 08:23, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> From: Michel Dänzer
>>>
>>> No need to manually look for the library files anymore with current
>>> LLVM. This sidesteps the manual method failing wh
On 09/08/17 03:24 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 8 August 2017 at 08:23, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> From: Michel Dänzer
>>
>> No need to manually look for the library files anymore with current
>> LLVM. This sidesteps the manual method failing when LLVM was built with
>> -DLLVM_APPEND_VC_REV=ON.
>>
>
On 8 August 2017 at 08:23, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> No need to manually look for the library files anymore with current
> LLVM. This sidesteps the manual method failing when LLVM was built with
> -DLLVM_APPEND_VC_REV=ON.
>
IIRC you recently spotted that the Suse packaging wa
Acked-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> No need to manually look for the library files anymore with current
> LLVM. This sidesteps the manual method failing when LLVM was built with
> -DLLVM_APPEND_VC_REV=ON.
>
> (This might al
12 matches
Mail list logo