On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 02:32 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Vadim Girlin vadimgir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 01:29 +0400, Vadim Girlin wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:16 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Vadim Girlin
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 19:47 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
I've got no idea what the flush was good for, but it's useless from
the looks of it. The rest of the patch is just a cleanup resulting
from some of the variables being no longer used for anything useful.
There are no piglit regressions.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Vadim Girlin vadimgir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 19:47 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
I've got no idea what the flush was good for, but it's useless from
the looks of it. The rest of the patch is just a cleanup resulting
from some of the variables
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:16 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Vadim Girlin vadimgir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 19:47 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
I've got no idea what the flush was good for, but it's useless from
the looks of it. The rest of the patch
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 01:29 +0400, Vadim Girlin wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:16 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Vadim Girlin vadimgir...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 19:47 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
I've got no idea what the flush was good for,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Vadim Girlin vadimgir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 01:29 +0400, Vadim Girlin wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:16 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Vadim Girlin vadimgir...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 19:47
