On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:18 +0300, Hasso Tepper wrote:
The attached patches add support for DragonFly BSD. dragonfly-mesa70.patch
is applicable to both 7.0 branch and master,
dragonfly-mesa-autoconf.patch just adds autoconf support for master only.
7.0 branch is fully tested, master isn't
Eric Anholt wrote:
I committed all but the static config files to master. Is there any
reason to have them, if the autoconf build works? I'm planning on
deleting the FreeBSD ones anyway if nobody complains, as they're
useless at this point as far as I can see (broken, and suck at
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:18 +0300, Hasso Tepper wrote:
The attached patches add support for DragonFly BSD. dragonfly-mesa70.patch
is applicable to both 7.0 branch and master,
dragonfly-mesa-autoconf.patch just adds
Hasso Tepper wrote:
The attached patches add support for DragonFly BSD. dragonfly-mesa70.patch
is applicable to both 7.0 branch and master,
dragonfly-mesa-autoconf.patch just adds autoconf support for master only.
7.0 branch is fully tested, master isn't due to need for too many stuff
