> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Otavio Salvador
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:25 AM
> To: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] is meta-fsl-ppc layer even used anymore?
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > i was
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > i was having trouble building for t1042d4rdb with the
>> >
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> >
> > i was having trouble building for t1042d4rdb with the
> > meta-fsl-ppc layer until i noticed that the meta-freescale layer
> > had a machine definition for
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i was having trouble building for t1042d4rdb with the meta-fsl-ppc
> layer until i noticed that the meta-freescale layer had a machine
> definition for the same target. does the meta-freescale layer
> obsolete
i was having trouble building for t1042d4rdb with the meta-fsl-ppc
layer until i noticed that the meta-freescale layer had a machine
definition for the same target. does the meta-freescale layer
obsolete meta-fsl-ppc?
rday
--