On 10/10/14, 2:18 PM, "Darren Hart" wrote:
>On 10/10/14, 11:46, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote:
>
>>
>>On 10/10/14, 9:40 AM, "Darren Hart" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Another concern is the statement below about not allowing for a default
>>>configuration. Like other recent changes to meta-intel, this should b
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 14:14 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 10/10/14, 12:00, "Tom Zanussi" wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:46 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/10/14, 10:31 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:25 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> >> >>
>
On 10 October 2014 22:18, Darren Hart wrote:
> The primary issue with eliminating the defaults from intel-corei7-64 and
> providing the default via machinesetuptool, is we then make
> machinesetuptool a requirement for that BSP for basic functionality. That
> isn't acceptable in my opinion.
Agree
On 10/10/14, 11:46, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote:
>
>On 10/10/14, 9:40 AM, "Darren Hart" wrote:
>
>>
>>Another concern is the statement below about not allowing for a default
>>configuration. Like other recent changes to meta-intel, this should be an
>>opt-in thing, and as such, the BSPs need to be a
On 10/10/14, 12:00, "Tom Zanussi" wrote:
>On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:46 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>
>> On 10/10/14, 10:31 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:25 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 10/10/14, 6:37 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Thu
On 10/10/14, 11:48, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/10/14, 1:34 PM, "Darren Hart" wrote:
>
>>On 10/10/14, 10:46, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 10/10/14, 10:31 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:25 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>
> On 10/10/14, 6
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:46 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>
> On 10/10/14, 10:31 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:25 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/10/14, 6:37 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:11 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.co
On 10/10/14, 1:34 PM, "Darren Hart" wrote:
>On 10/10/14, 10:46, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>On 10/10/14, 10:31 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:25 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
On 10/10/14, 6:37 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-10-0
On 10/10/14, 9:40 AM, "Darren Hart" wrote:
>Hi Nitin,
>
>This description helps to identify _what_ the tool is intended to do, but
>it still does not address the _how_, which is important context to have
>when reviewing the patches. There was also no mention of the sources to
>the tool itself,
On 10/10/14, 10:46, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/10/14, 10:31 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:25 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/10/14, 6:37 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:11 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
>>> >> F
On 10/8/14, 5:32, "nitin.a.kam...@intel.com"
wrote:
>From: Nitin A Kamble
>
>Add machine configuration for the NUC platform in the intel-corei7-64 BSP
>image.
Hi Nitin,
A few comments inline below...
>
>Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
>---
> .../machinesetuptool/intel-corei7-64/nuc-alsa.conf
On 10/10/14, 10:31 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:25 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>
>> On 10/10/14, 6:37 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:11 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
>> >> From: Nitin A Kamble
>> >>
>> >> The gmx500 graphics dri
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:25 -0500, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>
> On 10/10/14, 6:37 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:11 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> >> From: Nitin A Kamble
> >>
> >> The gmx500 graphics driver does not work on this BSP, but it takes
> >> the owne
On 10/10/14, 6:37 AM, "Zanussi, Tom" wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:11 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
>> From: Nitin A Kamble
>>
>> The gmx500 graphics driver does not work on this BSP, but it takes
>> the ownership of the graphics hardware at boot time, blocking other
>> drivers fr
On 10/8/14, 5:32, "nitin.a.kam...@intel.com"
wrote:
>From: Nitin A Kamble
>
>a new recipe which recipe provides the ability to setup a BSP image for a
>specific machine or platform at the boot time. The base recipe does not
>provide any machine configuration files, those are provided by individu
Hi Nitin,
This description helps to identify _what_ the tool is intended to do, but
it still does not address the _how_, which is important context to have
when reviewing the patches. There was also no mention of the sources to
the tool itself, also important for context.
One gap below is Gummibo
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:11 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble
>
> The gmx500 graphics driver does not work on this BSP, but it takes
> the ownership of the graphics hardware at boot time, blocking other
> drivers from using the graphics hardware.
>
> Fix the issue by
17 matches
Mail list logo
