Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] uefi-comboapp.bbclass: install files under pseudo

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:13 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:35 +0000, Wold, Saul wrote: > > Thanks, does this require a backport to Rocko/8.0.0 also? > > It's also broken there and it would be useful to backport it. > Pushed to master and roc

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] uefi-comboapp.bbclass: install files under pseudo

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 10:36 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > do_uefiapp_deploy copies files into the /boot directory of the rootfs > and thus, like do_rootfs, should run under pseudo so that the files > end up being owned by root. > > This did not trigger the uid leak check, perhaps because the task

Re: [meta-intel] [meta-intel-qat][PATCH] qat: upgrade to version 17_1.0.3-42

On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 23:39 +0800, Tan, Raymond wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel- > > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Wold, Saul > > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:09 PM > > To: met

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] linux-firmware: remove qat from linux-firmware

to you on that later? Thanks. Sau! > Hope this helps. > > Kind regards > Johan > > -----Original Message- > From: Wold, Saul > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:38 PM > To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] linux-firmware: remove qat from linux-firmware

On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 17:32 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote: > removed the following qat related binary files to avoid conflict when > incorporating the meta-intel-qat layer > 1) qat_c3xxx_mmp.bin > 2) qat_c62x.bin > 3) qat_c62x_mmp.bin > Is there a reason that the upstream

Re: [meta-intel] [meta-intel-qat][PATCH] qat: upgrade to version 17_1.0.3-42

On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 09:11 +, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote: > Please ignore this, I wasn't supposed to remove qat16 > Why not? We normally do not include multiple version of the same upstream in order to avoid confusion, is there a specific reason we need to maintain the qat16

Re: [meta-intel] Issue with ovmf license under Pyro

e image and then remove it, perhaps removing the > > > recipe > > > altogether? Not sure. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Paul > > > > > > On Wednesday, 4 October 2017 4:38:27 AM NZDT Wold, Saul wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-1

Re: [meta-intel] Issue with ovmf license under Pyro

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 19:41 +0200, Dominig Ar Foll wrote: > Hello, > > I am seeing an issue with the ovmf license in AGL, since yocto has > moved to Pyro. > I can fix by deactivating it, but I do not understand why I see the > error. > Hi Dominig, I tried to build the AGL code based on the

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] meta-intel.inc: Avoid installing thermald on poky-tiny

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 09:11 +0300, Jussi Laako wrote: > On 25.09.2017 10:00, Mikko Ylinen wrote: > > On 23/09/17 01:03, Alejandro Hernandez wrote: > > > When using DISTRO=poky-tiny we dont need to have thermald > > > and also it brings about ~4MB of dependencies. > > > > It's conceptually not

Re: [meta-intel] DPDK -- move to a separate sublayer

On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 12:54 +, Tan, Raymond wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Hatle [mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 11:30 PM > > To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org > > Cc: Tan

Re: [meta-intel] meta-mono build boot kernel panic

On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 16:07 +0800, Lai Eddy wrote: > I have build and boot successfully the core-image-minial with > MACHINE = "intel-corei7-64" > > but after I add according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cg > i/meta-mono/about/?h=daisy > IMAGE_INSTALL += " mono mono-helloworld" >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH v2] linux-firware_%.bbappend: multiple fixes

On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 14:26 -0700, California Sullivan wrote: > Fix yocto project compatibility issue: was using raw _appends, > without a > machineoverride. > > Fix not pinning to a specific commit ID. The firmware could be > updated, > which would change the hash and break the build

Re: [meta-intel] Xeon D1500 GPIO userspace access write error: No such device or address

On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 09:12 +0800, Lai Eddy wrote: > I have just build and run Yocto(Pyro 2.3.1) Linux on my Xeon D1500 > board, > I want to use the SOC's GPIO pins for a push button, so I use > "bitbake linux-yocto -c menuconfig" to enable the > "Device Drivers"-->"GPIO Support"-->"sysfs

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH V3 2/3] linux-yocto: remove ixgbe and ixgbevf

On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 17:12 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote: > removing in-tree ixgbe and ixgbevf kernel module to enable out-of- > tree ixgbe and ixgbevf module from linux-yocto 4.4 > > Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif yed.mohamad.fa...@intel.com> > --- >  

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH V2 2/3] linux-intel: remove ixgbe and ixgbevf

On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 15:39 +0300, Mikko Ylinen wrote: > Hi, > > > On 21/08/17 09:26, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote: > > > > removing in-tree ixgbe and ixgbevf kernel modules to enable out-of- > > tree ixgbe and ixgbevf modules from linux-intel > > > > Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad

Re: [meta-intel] BSP QA Test Report for Meta-Intel Release 2.4 M2 rc2

Thanks for this report, as stated below, we had one issue related to the new iwlwifi and another parselog (bane of my existence at this point). The iwlwifi has been address and merged, so that bug can be closed, I will not do an RC3. I know the parselog issues are accumlating, some should get

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] libyami: Fix build with musl/clang

On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 09:23 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Wold, Saul <saul.w...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 21:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > These patches are interesting from upstreaming p

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 3/3] linux-intel: remove ixgbe and ixgbevf

On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 13:21 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote: > removing in-tree ixgbe and ixgbevf kernel modules to enable out-of- > tree ixgbe and ixgbevf modules from linux-intel > > Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif yed.mohamad.fa...@intel.com> > --- >  

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 1/3] intel-ethernet: IXGBE upgrade to version 5.1.3

On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 13:21 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote: > From: Syed Johan Arif Bin Syed Mohamad Fauzi hamad.fa...@intel.com> > Almost there!  There are a few more tweaks needed. > Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] dpdk: DPDK upgrade to version 17.05

issue, normally we would back port patches to fix CVE issues. Sau! > Kind regards > Johan > > -----Original Message- > From: Wold, Saul > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:31 AM > To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif > <syed.johan.arif

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] dpdk: DPDK upgrade to version 17.05

This patch does not apply to the master branch of meta-intel, you need to ensure this is against master please. Thanks    Sau! On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 16:23 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote: > Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif yed.mohamad.fa...@intel.com> > ---

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] cryptodev-module: update 0001-zc-Force-4.10-get_user_pages_remote-API.patch

On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 00:09 +, Wold, Saul wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 19:42 -0700, Robert Yang wrote: > > > > Update it for cryptodev-module 1.9. > > > > Not sure what happened, but I am getting the following failures in > the > World build.  I seem

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] cryptodev-module: update 0001-zc-Force-4.10-get_user_pages_remote-API.patch

On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 19:42 -0700, Robert Yang wrote: > Update it for cryptodev-module 1.9. > Not sure what happened, but I am getting the following failures in the World build.  I seem to be OK building this on a local machine.

Re: [meta-intel] [meta-intel LMS][PATCHV3] Added 0003-Fix-device-file-referance-to-dev-mei0-remove-select.patch patch.

Anand, I am sorry, I am going to have to reject this again, you did not provide a properly formatted main commit message to the patch. Again, please review: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Me ssage_Guidelines The commit message subject is poorly formatted and a one-line commit

Re: [meta-intel] [meta-intel LMS][PATCHV2 1/2] Fix device file referance to /dev/mei0 and remove select post write.

Well, sorry, but this is also not correct!   This commit message needs to be inside the patch you are creating below and the this along with 2/2 should be 1 patch. You can then submit this as you did the first version.  Again, please review the wiki links I sent you. See below in the .patch

Re: [meta-intel] Yocto meta-intel LMS patch:

Please review the  https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded   and  https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines On how to properly submit a patch to meta-intel@yoctoproject.org. This is not correctly formatted and the internal 0003* patch

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH V2] libyami: Update to 1.2.0

My bad, I was looking on the wrong branch, I have this updated version and willbe running it on the AB here shortly. Sorry for the noise. Sau! On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 10:22 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 08:00 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > Use downloadfilename fetcher option

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH RFC] systemd-boot_%.bbappend: Add stub command line modifications patch

On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 13:19 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 18:47 -0700, California Sullivan wrote: > > > > Allows you to modify the command line when called from EFI shell > > instead of the entire command line getting replaced. > > > > Signed-off-by: California Sullivan

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH RFC 2/4] systemd-boot_%.bbappend: compile and deploy EFI stub

On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 18:30 -0700, California Sullivan wrote: > The EFI stub can be used to directly boot a kernel + initramfs. > This addition was taken from meta-refkit. > > Signed-off-by: California Sullivan > --- >  

[meta-intel] CCB Approval Request for Meta-Intel

Meta-Intel BSP Team: Attached is the QA report for the meta-intel 7.0 release for Yocto Project 2.3. Based on the report and review of the outstanding and new bugs, I am going to have the release team complete the release process on Tuesday, unless I hear a negative response. I have closed the

Re: [meta-intel] BSP QA Test Report for Meta-Intel Release 2.3 rc4

Stephen, I have reviewed the open bugs and closed the Cherry Hill/4.1 Race bug as wont fix due to it being on older non-public hardware. I am ready to release this if we do not need a CCB, otherwise please start the CCB process for meta-intel release. Sau! On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 12:23 +,

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] libyami: Add PACKAGECONFIG for x11

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 11:36 +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > Without this the recipe fails to build without x11, breaking world > build. > > Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen > --- >  common/recipes-multimedia/libyami/libyami-utils_1.1.0.bb | 6 ++ >  1 file changed, 6

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] Include recommended packges for all Intel machines

On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 09:49 +0200, Mikko Ylinen wrote: > > On 21/03/17 20:08, Wold, Saul wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 11:39 +0200, Jussi Laako wrote: > > > > > > On 21.03.2017 01:59, Cal Sullivan wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] Include recommended packges for all Intel machines

On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 11:39 +0200, Jussi Laako wrote: > On 21.03.2017 01:59, Cal Sullivan wrote: > > > > The addition of kernel-modules is going to greatly increase the > > size of > > -minimal images for intel-corei7-64 and intel-core2-32, as these > > configurations build a lot of modules. I

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] Add thermald to MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS

On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 17:10 +0200, Jussi Laako wrote: > On core2-32 and corei7-64, add thermald to MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS. > > Signed-off-by: Jussi Laako > --- >  conf/machine/intel-core2-32.conf  | 2 +- >  conf/machine/intel-corei7-64.conf | 2 +- >  2 files

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 1/8] common/binutils-2.24.51.0.3: New recipe

On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 10:11 -0800, Cal Sullivan wrote: > This one really scares me. Old version, removed CVE fixes, and might > cause compatibility issues with other layers... > > Saul? > I thought that Alejandro was going to have another series that removed the binutils? Alejandro? There was

Re: [meta-intel] Does it support i5 too ?

On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 06:24 +0200, Ran Shalit wrote: > Hello, > > In meta-intel readme in GIT, I see that it supports: > >  - Intel-core2-32 Intel® Common Core BSP (Intel-core2-32) >  - Intel-core2-32 Intel® Common Core BSP (Intel-quark) >  - Intel-corei7-64 Intel® Common Core BSP

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/2] Add RMC support in systemd-boot's EFI stub

On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 15:35 +0200, Mikko Ylinen wrote: > This patchset enables to use runtime machine configuration (RMC) in > systemd-boot's EFI stub too. > > I've been using Minnowboard Turbot boards (in addition to a 'broxton- > m' > board) in testing. However, the RMC data for Turbot was

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 1/2] systemd-boot: use RMC database in EFI stub

On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 15:36 +0200, Mikko Ylinen wrote: > systemd-boot's EFI stub can be built in an EFI executable > with the kernel, cmdline, and initrd. > > This commit enables the EFI stub code to use the RMC database > and appends the board specific cmdline (KBOOTPARAM) to the > built-in

Re: [meta-intel] OpenCL stalls on Apollo Lake GPU

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 12:27 +, Tony Whittam wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I don't know if this is too specialised for this list. I was directed > to the Yocto Resources by Intel Premier Support. Anyway, no harm in > asking the question :-) > Right,

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] linux-yocto: fix builds for x32

On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 13:28 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote: > From: Christopher Larson > > corei7-64-intel-common overrides are used here, but this isn't in use > when > building for x32. Also obey this for corei7-64-x32-intel-common. > > An alternative would be to

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] multimedia recipes: add libyami, intel VA-API Media codecs with hardware acceleration

On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 20:27 -0500, wudping wrote: > add libyami_1.0.1.bb and libyami-utils_1.0.1.bb files. > Yami is core building block for media solution; libyami-utils has > some Applications > and Scripts for libyami. > Please split this into 2 patches one for each recipe and correct the

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] gstreamer-vaapi and libva: check for opengl feature.

On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 16:26 +0200, Ismo Puustinen wrote: > In case "opengl" is missing from DISTRO_FEATURES, libva fails to > satisfy > its dependencies. The dependency check is done by BitBake when > meta-world-pkgdata gathers information about all available packages > during image builds, even

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/5] removed meta-isg and meta-mohonpeak

On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 01:33 +, Gupta, Rahul KumarXX wrote: > Hi Saul, > > > > > Unfortunately, this is too late for the meta-intel-6.0 release, we > > built the rc2 > > yesterday. I will work on merging this early next week to master, > > but it won't > > be part of the morty release. > > >

Re: [meta-intel] BSP layer for AIMB-275

On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:59 -0500, Paul Knopf wrote: > Is the meta-intel layer the one I should be using for this > motherboard? > > http://www.advantech.com/products/68ccaea2-9ff5-4f85-97f2-3d11244b0a0 > 8/aimb-275/mod_340f9d4a-17ed-44ac-9f00-5e96729ed7a7 > > I am using an i7 6700 with a Q170

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/5] removed meta-isg and meta-mohonpeak

Hi Rhaul, Raymond: Unfortunately, this is too late for the meta-intel-6.0 release, we built the rc2 yesterday. I will work on merging this early next week to master, but it won't be part of the morty release. Sau! On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 17:38 +0800, Rahul Kumar Gupta wrote: > Dear