Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:52:45AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
On 5/29/2015 3:37 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See
recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb).
These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get
installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for
building firmware.
Should they be -native then?
I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before.
If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all
paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET
Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point.
Can we simply FILES_${PN} += * to pick up everything installed and shove
it
into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps
can be
used on the target in the future...
Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be
pulled into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the
${PN}-dev package (they are purely development files), and then
ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = 1?
Actually, that's a good idea. Should we modify other recipes similarly, when
they only provide build dependencies for DSP?
It seems this would make the most sense.
Should I submit patches for the recently updated packages which
would be effected? They are the following:
* ti-sysbios
* ti-xdais
Let me push what I already have to not delay it any longer. Please send a
followup patch to update FILES_${PN}-dev - could be a single patch across
recipes. Thanks.
I'm not sure about ti-xdctools since this includes xdc and other utilities.
On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler j-stiff...@ti.com wrote:
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = installed-vs-shipped
can this be fixed instead ?
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See
recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb).
These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get
installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for
building firmware.
Should they be -native then?
I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before.
If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all
paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET
Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point.
Can we simply FILES_${PN} += * to pick up everything installed and shove it
into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps can
be
used on the target in the future...
Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be
pulled into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the
${PN}-dev package (they are purely development files), and then
ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = 1?
Actually, that's a good idea. Should we modify other recipes similarly, when
they only provide build dependencies for DSP?
On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler j-stiff...@ti.com wrote:
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = installed-vs-shipped
can this be fixed instead ?
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04
On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See
recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb).
These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get
installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for
building firmware.
Should they be -native then?
I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before.
If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all
paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET
Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point.
Can we simply FILES_${PN} += * to pick up everything installed and shove it
into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps can be
used on the target in the future...
Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be pulled
into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the ${PN}-dev package
(they are purely development files), and then ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = 1?
On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler j-stiff...@ti.com wrote:
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = installed-vs-shipped
can this be fixed instead ?
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See
recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb).
These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get
installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for
building firmware.
Should they be -native then?
I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before.
If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all
paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET
Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point.
Can we simply FILES_${PN} += * to pick up everything installed and shove it
into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps can be
used on the target in the future...
On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler j-stiff...@ti.com wrote:
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = installed-vs-shipped
can this be fixed instead ?
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
[meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04
Signed-off-by: Jacob Stiffler j-stiff...@ti.com
---
recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_7.24.00.04.bb | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_7.24.00.04.bb
diff --git a/recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_7.24.00.04.bb
b/recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_7.24.00.04.bb
new file mode 100644
index 000..0f27514
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_7.24.00.04.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+require ti-xdais.inc
+
+PV = 7_24_00_04
+
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
file://xdais_7_24_00_04_Manifest.html;md5=fd16442230745f0877cfe1c622669fd6
+
+SRC_URI[xdaistarball.md5sum] = f7514085b531f2ae49b37b30194e4989
+SRC_URI[xdaistarball.sha256sum] =
79fd30377ab4c497292aeefb0565f81703d9020d1242b02ca9968c561e0de9a1
+
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = installed-vs-shipped
--
1.7.9.5
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04
I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See
recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb).
These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get
installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for
building firmware.
On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler j-stiff...@ti.com wrote:
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = installed-vs-shipped
can this be fixed instead ?
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04
On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler j-stiff...@ti.com wrote:
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = installed-vs-shipped
can this be fixed instead ?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--
___
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
