Hi Martin,
Can you update the u-boot-mkimage recipe as well?
https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-petalinux/blob/master/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2018.01.bb
An give it a shot?
We use the entire layer stack during testing meta-petalinux,meta-xilinx and
meta-xilinx-tools and did not see this
When running the ubi-tests we see it crashing due to SPI timeout:
m25p80 spi0.0: SPI transfer timed out
m25p80 spi0.0: error -110 reading 5
error -110 reading SR
Has anyone experienced similar with the qspi-nor driver on latest rocko branch?
From: Martin Lund
Building and running core-image-minimal for the zcu102-zynqmp machine on the
recently released rel-v2018.1 branch results in u-boot crashing with the
following error:
fdt_root: FDT_ERR_BADMAGIC
Boot files are installed on the SD card following the normal guildelines -
first partition (BOOT,
With the Zynq 7 series you needed pin 8 free, because it was being used
to feed back the clock through the IO pad. Without that configured, it
would not work above 50MHz. In the pinmux config you had to enable this,
and it would be used when the clock divider was set to 2 (yielding
100MHz
The problem seems to be that u-boot has been upgraded to v2018.1 which
introduces changes to how the ATF is booted and that has somehow broken the
boot procedure.
I notice that a new CONFIG_SPL_ATF config option has been introduced in u-boot
specifically to boot u-boot via ATF but it is not
(resending from right email)
Hi,
I've also seen a ton of issues myself with just getting QSPI working on the
ultrascale Zynq. We've been going back and forth with Xilinx support since
early December trying to get the QSPI on our board working (an example of
some of the changes is here
Yeah, I see a lot of good stuff coming from you and Holden Sandlar trying to
fix/patch the qspi-nor driver but as you state Xilinx seems to pay little
attention to this driver. I've also applied your patches.
Surprisingly, we have just discovered that if we lower the spi-max-frequency
from
> On Apr 30, 2018, at 3:30 AM, Nathan Rossi wrote:
>
> At the end of the day the filename matters very little assuming the PV
> is set in the recipe as that is the important value, especially for
> these recipes since its very likely there will only be one version
>
On 30 April 2018 at 14:36, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nathan Rossi [mailto:nat...@nathanrossi.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 5:04 AM
>> To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
>> Cc: