I've used Supercard for years but much prefer MetaCard for numerous reason. However
Supercard and FlameThrower are a fantasic combo for writing CGI's on my Mac web
servers.
I'm not sure how Flamethrower works but it bridges the gap between the HTTP server and
the stack allowing easy
Hi, I share your interest in this area, so I'll throw in what I know. First
there are two (and a half) basic ways of getting MetaCard to do/serve CGI's.
1) Install MetaCard as CGI engine for an existing HTTP server
2) Use MetaCard as a server (see MCHTTP stack for skeleton)
The first
Tuviah
couldn't find the spreadsheet object ... where/what's it called again?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sadhunathan Nadesan)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:25:39 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re, slicing and dicing tabular data
|
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuviah
couldn't find the spreadsheet object ... where/what's it called
again?
That would be group 1 (the one with 437 lines of script). You can see an
example of use at card 3 of stack "table props".
Again the stack can be found at
Gary,
You will need to work with sockets to duplicate Flamethrower's functionality.
I've ported a large Flamethrower project to Metacard with little trouble. I
started with the httpd server stack (available at Metacard's site), became
familiar with sockets, and then rewrote all of the cgi_X()
| i would like to know how to take her spread sheet object
| and actually install it in a stack. can you help?
|
| Ensure that selectedGroupedControls is false, then select the group object
| that contains the spreadsheet, and copy and paste that into your stack.
|
hi
ok, i figured out
Scott Raney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said, on 7/4/00 4:59 PM:
QT gets penalized for two reasons: 1) it bypasses the OS whenever it
can (which may explain why forcing it to use GDI calls makes it work
better on NT because this ties it closer to the OS) and 2) it starts
its own thread that does stuff
