Here's my suggestion re: plug-in dilemma. Maybe someone on the list
(Kevin? Richard? Hugh?) could put together a really nice MetaCard
Browser, replete with bookmarking, maybe a little news downloader, and
all the bells, whistles, and chrome that users expect from RealPlayer.
Then just put
Craig Spooner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said, on 5/31/00 10:09 PM:
Well, Blair has certainly echoed my feelings. And because everything
is on the Web these days, wouldn't it make more sense to tie into the
browser rather than simulate a browser in MC? The MC plugin would
seem to provide the richer
Kevin Miller wrote:
On 1/6/00 4:43 pm, LK Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's my suggestion re: plug-in dilemma. Maybe someone on the list
(Kevin? Richard? Hugh?) could put together a really nice MetaCard
Browser, replete with bookmarking, maybe a little news downloader, and
all
Greetings all,
Please forgive me for asking something that has probably appeared
here a hundred times... What is the rationale for *not* building a
MetaCard plugin for web browsers? People ask me about it all the
time when I describe all the wonderful things MC can do. It seems a
missed
On 5/31/00 8:16 AM, Craig Spooner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to build small training
apps for faculty that would run in students' browsers.
But downloading the MC engine and running the app separate
from the browser seems altogether too cumbersome. Have I,
indeed,
Blair Moxon wrote:
Believe it or not the response that I have heard is that people are more
comfortable within a browser because it has a "forward and back button". I
suppose this is because they don't lose context of where they are (by
keeping everything in the same window) and they can
1. Although you and I hear a good many requests for this sort of thing, for
most folks there are only three tolerable plugins: Real, QuickTime, and
Flash. All others have such a tiny slice of the download pie that they're
not even worth mentioning.
Yes, I agree. But there are other
