*that would do it*.
I said *more* attractive, I also said *complete*.
I already bought a license for a home stack because I agree with the
rest of what you said.
You know, I'm in the printing business, so printing *is* important to us.
Printing in MC 2.3...? hope to be there soo
At 10:14 AM +0200 17/8/1999, dohna wrote:
>Hiho!
>
>I simply do not understand what you people want!
I understand and agree with most of what you say. I think I triggered
this thread with my "printing trickery" reference, but then found
myself defending Metacard's printing. (:
I still think Me
Hiho!
I simply do not understand what you people want!
Someone wrote, printing was essential for business applications. True,
true, true! We have an information system and what most people do with
it is printing. I dont print that much myself, but our customers print
as if it was the last thing
t at system level?)
>
>Am I too optimistic about future new printing capabilities in MC?
>
>I'm a long time Hypercard user that likes the object based graphics of
>MC, I want to print them along with styled text with one command!
>
>If nobody inside or outside MC Corp. can bu
stem level?)
Am I too optimistic about future new printing capabilities in MC?
I'm a long time Hypercard user that likes the object based graphics of
MC, I want to print them along with styled text with one command!
If nobody inside or outside MC Corp. can build some professional
print
>I agree with this wholeheartedly. We have an application (CD-based
>performance coaching) in which the manager and rep choose activities
>from a list and print out the development activities with descriptions
>and actions. Right now, I simply export everything out to a text file
>and ask the user
Jacqueline responded to a statement that a user rarely has a need to
print anything from Metacard:
> I'm thinking that this must be the case with almost everyone, or there
> would have been more discussion about it.
I wonder how much of this is a cyclical "we know the printing functions
aren't w
